frontend-patterns/research/bench/infospaces/local-first-authority-06/artifacts/generated/candidates.md

No candidates are justified by the provided evidence. The single passage, "we treat the copy of the data on your local device — your laptop, tablet, or phone — as the primary copy," is insufficient to propose a frontend pattern. It defines a characteristic of "local-first software" (C01, C02) but does not describe a recurring solution to a problem within a specific context, nor does it provide enough detail to identify forces, dynamics, or consequences. Distinguishing a "primary local copy" from a "subordinate cache" (as noted in the investigation question) requires additional information on persistence, concurrency, and recovery, which is explicitly stated as missing.

{"candidates": [], "known_uses": [], "recurrence": "unknown"}