frontend-patterns/research/evaluations/language-pilot-01/raw/r04/answer.md
tegwick 3690af12a5 Record twelve pilot sessions and masked editorial judgments
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
2026-09-26 20:04:29 +02:00

6 lines
No EOL
915 B
Markdown

Here's an evaluation and recovery plan:
* **Outcome/State:** The original message payload is present, but its operation identity is lost, leading to an unknown server outcome for the initial send attempt.
* **Preserved Information:** Only the immutable message payload itself is retained across device changes and reinstallation.
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** The product's suggestion to generate a fresh ID and automatically retry is flawed. This risks duplicating the message if the original send was successful. Instead, the user must be prompted to manually confirm re-sending the message, acknowledging the potential for duplication.
* **Missing Contract or Clarification:** The server's deduplication scope and retention for operation IDs are critical but unspecified. Without this, it's impossible to know if the original message was processed or if a fresh ID would truly be safe.