tegwick
3690af12a5
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
1.1 KiB
1.1 KiB
This architecture needs refinement to handle authorization denial gracefully.
- Outcome/State: The local commit remains, but the pending upload is explicitly rejected due to authorization. The editor is in a state of "accepted locally, rejected remotely."
- Preserved Information: The full local commit of confidential notes, including its revision and operation identity, must be retained. The server's explicit denial and the reason (authorization failure) should also be recorded.
- Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative: The system should prompt the user to explicitly reconcile the rejected upload, perhaps by allowing them to save the notes locally or export them. Blindly discarding the local commit or attempting a re-upload with a new identity is inappropriate as it would lose data and violate the "never lose edits" requirement.
- Missing Contract or Clarification: A clear contract is needed regarding the retention, viewing, and export of local data for users whose write authorization has been revoked. This will dictate the specific recovery options presented to the user.