tegwick
3690af12a5
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
1.2 KiB
Here's a recommendation for the frontend architecture:
-
Outcome/State: The editor should display the confidential notes as locally committed but with a clear, persistent indication that the pending upload was explicitly rejected due to authorization failure. The notes remain editable locally.
-
Preserved Information: The full content of the confidential notes, their local commit identity, and the identity of the rejected upload attempt must be retained. The explicit server rejection message should also be preserved and associated with the failed upload.
-
Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative: The user should be presented with options to either discard the local changes (if they choose to, understanding the implications) or attempt to export/save the content locally. Blindly retrying the upload with a new identity is rejected as it doesn't address the authorization issue and could lead to data duplication if the server's rejection was transient.
-
Missing Contract or Clarification: A clear contract is needed regarding the retention and access policies for locally committed data when server authorization is revoked. Specifically, can the user continue to view, edit, or export these notes, or should they be purged?