frontend-patterns/research/evaluations/language-pilot-01/raw/r11/answer.md
tegwick 3690af12a5 Record twelve pilot sessions and masked editorial judgments
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
2026-09-26 20:04:29 +02:00

796 B

Here's an assessment of the proposed design:

  • Outcome/State: The design cannot guarantee edits survive device loss or complete power failure, nor can it claim recovery is solved.
  • Preserved Information: Only two copies of a conflict are stored on the same device, and the sync protocol propagates deletions, which risks data loss.
  • Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative: The proposal to remove conflict review from the keyboard interface is premature and dangerous, as it eliminates the user's ability to resolve divergent versions.
  • Missing Contract or Clarification: There is no documented contract for restart-safe offline editing that covers device loss or power failure, nor is there a clear definition of how deletions are handled during conflict resolution.