frontend-patterns/research/reviews/PreviewOntology-0.1.md
tegwick 53bb65e7a6 Complete the bounded language 0.1 research preview
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a0e241-8285-7a63-8c0c-51c9cb824dc3
2026-09-27 11:49:48 +02:00

38 lines
3 KiB
Markdown

# Ontology review for the 0.1 reference subset
2026-09-27, Codex author-model editorial review. Owner WP-0003 T03.
**Bounded result: retain with qualifications. M2 remains open.** No general proof
of minimal responsibilities, independent dimensions or complete pattern recurrence.
## Conflict Copy versus Explicit Reconciliation
Retain two research identities for preview retrieval:
- Conflict Copy answers “how do we keep detected competing content available while
continuing work?” Its result is preserved divergence, not resolved meaning.
- Explicit Reconciliation answers “how do we decide intended content and record the
decision?” It can use a version store without making a separate conflict file.
Preservation may precede manual review, but may also be followed by a justified
automatic merge or a deferred decision. Manual comparison can receive alternatives
from a revision store. Therefore neither unconditional requires edge is justified.
Export one conditional creates-context-for edge from CAND-0001 to CAND-0004 and
state the conditions. This is conceptual reasoning, not an observed independent
implementation of both complete contracts. Test whether readers can select one
without being forced into the other; merge later if that distinction proves unhelpful.
## Other decisions
| Question | Preview disposition | Limit |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pending Synchronization versus Mutation Outcome Tracking | Retain both: local work may already be accepted while remote propagation is pending; remote write acceptance may instead be unknown | Shared operation-state model may motivate later refactoring; no full recurrence claim |
| Version precondition versus operation identity | Distinct obligations: stale-base rejection versus recovery of a particular attempt | One does not establish the other; receiver semantics must be checked |
| Local draft versus locally accepted record | Retain separate; editable intent need not be durable or locally authoritative | Add persistence only under explicit policy/storage requirements |
| Authority, projection and delivery | Apply the [six-question aid](AuthorityProjectionComparison.md); retain the six seeds without new drafts | Separate decisions with compatibility constraints, not universally independent axes |
| Families versus responsibilities | Keep separate classification fields; quality is a family, reconciliation a responsibility | Provisional direct-mechanism assignments and selected forces are not exhaustive ontology proof |
| Relations and prerequisites | Export only scoped proposals with rationale; no inverse, symmetric or transitive inference | Proposed links are not canonical graph edges; contextual conditions are not pattern IDs |
| Scale coverage | Preserve current labels and gaps, including L0/L7 | No automatic relabeling to fill empty cells |
No M2-CoverageReview pass is claimed: VC-04/05 are absent and VC-03/06 remain provisional.
This closes the preview's bounded ontology inspection, not WP-0003 T03. Independent
retrieval/usefulness and broader case outcomes may overturn these provisional choices.