frontend-patterns/workplans/FEP-WP-0002-seed-language-validation.md
tegwick 8a141b7fe5 Establish phased research program with evidence and validation gates
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
2026-09-24 07:58:09 +02:00

72 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
id: FEP-WP-0002
type: workplan
title: "Validate the seed frontend pattern language"
domain: infotech
repo: frontend-patterns
status: ready
owner: codex
topic_slug: canon
created: "2026-09-23"
updated: "2026-09-24"
state_hub_workstream_id: "3350b7f2-375a-54e8-8f7c-3bf7c7c3af71"
---
# Validate the seed frontend pattern language
First executable cycle of `research/plan/ResearchProgram.md`, following `REVIEW.md`
and FEP-WP-0001. Readiness review on 2026-09-24: scaffold is present, source and
walkthrough templates exist, VC-01/VC-02 are defined, and deliverables below are
bounded. No research execution or evidence gate is claimed complete.
T01 and source extraction in T02 can proceed independently. T03 requires both.
Use `research/plan/ResearchProtocol.md`; track Q01–Q04 in the question ledger.
## Reconcile the metadata contract
```task
id: FEP-WP-0002-T01
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "e59295dd-a087-5dbc-9bb2-230488c48e96"
```
Resolve relation spelling, force and pattern IDs, prerequisite target types,
multi-scale representation and editorial status versus evidence maturity.
Done when schema and template agree and a worked example resolves every reference.
## Establish traceable source evidence
```task
id: FEP-WP-0002-T02
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "0eb32b3e-07d6-5e16-a735-7d75d9dace83"
```
Complete the first source case and a contrasting local-first source review.
Record source identity, URL, date/version, claim references, interpretations and
counterexamples. Reconcile README maturity claims with the evidence.
## Validate a connected seed corpus
```task
id: FEP-WP-0002-T03
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "54940b04-1d0f-5bff-98d4-be290eca8048"
```
Author a small connected pattern set and exercise it in server-authoritative and
local-first scenarios. Show forces, alternatives, ordering rationale, resulting
contexts and failure modes. Record gaps, then define the minimum metadata
validator and graph export needed by these examples.
## Phase acceptance
Produce 6–10 connected draft patterns, complete VC-01 and VC-02, and write
`research/reviews/M1-SeedReview.md` with evidence for each M1 criterion. Include
rejected or merged candidates and any source-access limitations. Retain hypothesis
maturity where evidence is incomplete. Handoff broader investigations to FEP-WP-0003;
metadata tooling and empirical evaluation are tracked in FEP-WP-0004.