tegwick
1f95f6389a
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
1.5 KiB
Carniato source review — authority and feedback
Status: extracted; initial manual review, 2026-09-24, codex (self-review). Source: SRC-0001, Ryan Carniato, original article. Edition and date uncertainty: see the source catalog. No API-generated findings.
| Claim | Original locator | Source statement, paraphrased | Our interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| C01 | Core Responsibilities, Content, paragraph 1 | Content authority resides on the server. | Authority placement is an assumption of this model. |
| C02 | Core Responsibilities, Affordances, paragraph 1 | Interaction feedback should precede a server round trip. | Local feedback need not imply local authority. |
| C03 | Content: Reactive reads over the wire, final paragraph | The live graph must be reconstructible from durable state. | Projection state and durable authority should be distinguished. |
C03 was checked manually in the original; it is outside the bench excerpt.
Limits and counterexample
The article's universal framing is broader than this review supports. Local-first primary data challenges mandatory server authority; it does not refute separating responsibilities. Framework implementation claims and examples were not executed.
Disposition
Retain Server Authority and Immediate Feedback as candidates. Do not infer a requires edge between them. Recurrence and failure behavior need further evidence. Broader architecture comparisons remain open under FEP-WP-0002-T02/T03.