frontend-patterns/research/evaluations/language-pilot-01/raw/r11/answer.md
tegwick 3690af12a5 Record twelve pilot sessions and masked editorial judgments
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
2026-09-26 20:04:29 +02:00

6 lines
No EOL
796 B
Markdown

Here's an assessment of the proposed design:
* **Outcome/State:** The design cannot guarantee edits survive device loss or complete power failure, nor can it claim recovery is solved.
* **Preserved Information:** Only two copies of a conflict are stored on the same device, and the sync protocol propagates deletions, which risks data loss.
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** The proposal to remove conflict review from the keyboard interface is premature and dangerous, as it eliminates the user's ability to resolve divergent versions.
* **Missing Contract or Clarification:** There is no documented contract for restart-safe offline editing that covers device loss or power failure, nor is there a clear definition of how deletions are handled during conflict resolution.