frontend-patterns/workplans/FEP-WP-0004-reference-surface.md

id	type	title	domain	repo	status	owner	topic_slug	created	updated	state_hub_workstream_id
FEP-WP-0004	workplan	Evaluate retrieval and real repository applicability	infotech	frontend-patterns	proposed	codex	canon	2026-09-24	2026-09-27	831bbc30-30c0-5df3-a315-5355cd3b8ee5

Evaluate retrieval and real repository applicability

Part of research/plan/ResearchProgram.md. Phase prerequisite: FEP-WP-0003's evidence gate. This is planned follow-up, not an active background execution request. Individual task descriptions identify any work that can start earlier.

Validate metadata and export the graph

id: FEP-WP-0004-T01
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "4fec98f6-fee2-52fc-a01c-f490c79ee0f8"

After the schema and seed examples pass M1, implement the smallest validator/exporter needed to check unique IDs, allowed values, relation targets and evidence references. Add meaningful invalid and valid fixtures; preserve prose and source provenance.

Evaluate held-out retrieval cases

id: FEP-WP-0004-T02
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "4bdd4c53-fcdb-5dfd-9a37-ebc3fee4d445"

After M2, freeze a corpus revision and evaluate at least six unseen prompts following ValidationCases.md. Record expected alternatives, abstentions, unsupported claims and missed constraints; compare with manual navigation. Address Q07.

Test against real repository revisions

id: FEP-WP-0004-T03
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "ab66848b-1045-54dd-9711-52c5560faafa"

Study at least two contrasting accessible repositories at recorded revisions. Separate observed implementation from inferred intent. Write research/reviews/M3-EmpiricalReview.md, publish limitations, and hand remaining findings into live work records.

User-directed early reuse loop — 2026-09-27

WP-0008 owns an early qualified-reference pilot and consumer outcome instrumentation, authorized by the user's request for autonomous ecosystem improvement. It may proceed before M1/M2. It is distinct from this workplan's canonical export and held-out M3 claims; it does not rename consumed feedback into unseen evaluation cases. This plan remains proposed with its original task gates. Routine reuse must not await those claims or require a human survey; preserve evidence provenance and honest unknowns.