tegwick
debf9e0aa0
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
101 lines
4 KiB
Markdown
101 lines
4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
id: FEP-WP-0002
|
||
type: workplan
|
||
title: "Validate the seed frontend pattern language"
|
||
domain: infotech
|
||
repo: frontend-patterns
|
||
status: ready
|
||
quality_dor: DoR-Ok
|
||
quality_dor_at: "2026-09-24"
|
||
quality_dor_by: codex
|
||
quality_dor_note: "Self-review against work-item-dor; see readiness assessment below."
|
||
reviewed_at: "2026-09-24"
|
||
reviewed_against_commit: "c161369ad58782ff0a13429c61cc7c8efc36e33d"
|
||
owner: codex
|
||
topic_slug: canon
|
||
created: "2026-09-23"
|
||
updated: "2026-09-24"
|
||
state_hub_workstream_id: "3350b7f2-375a-54e8-8f7c-3bf7c7c3af71"
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Validate the seed frontend pattern language
|
||
|
||
First executable cycle of `research/plan/ResearchProgram.md`, following `REVIEW.md`
|
||
and FEP-WP-0001. Readiness review on 2026-09-24: scaffold is present, source and
|
||
walkthrough templates exist, VC-01/VC-02 are defined, and deliverables below are
|
||
bounded. No research execution or evidence gate is claimed complete.
|
||
|
||
T01 and source extraction in T02 can proceed independently. T03 requires both.
|
||
Use `research/plan/ResearchProtocol.md`; track Q01–Q04 in the question ledger.
|
||
|
||
## Reconcile the metadata contract
|
||
|
||
```task
|
||
id: FEP-WP-0002-T01
|
||
status: todo
|
||
priority: high
|
||
state_hub_task_id: "e59295dd-a087-5dbc-9bb2-230488c48e96"
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Resolve relation spelling, force and pattern IDs, prerequisite target types,
|
||
multi-scale representation and editorial status versus evidence maturity.
|
||
Done when schema and template agree and a worked example resolves every reference.
|
||
|
||
## Establish traceable source evidence
|
||
|
||
```task
|
||
id: FEP-WP-0002-T02
|
||
status: todo
|
||
priority: high
|
||
state_hub_task_id: "0eb32b3e-07d6-5e16-a735-7d75d9dace83"
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Complete the first source case and a contrasting local-first source review.
|
||
Record source identity, URL, date/version, claim references, interpretations and
|
||
counterexamples. Reconcile README maturity claims with the evidence.
|
||
|
||
## Validate a connected seed corpus
|
||
|
||
```task
|
||
id: FEP-WP-0002-T03
|
||
status: todo
|
||
priority: medium
|
||
state_hub_task_id: "54940b04-1d0f-5bff-98d4-be290eca8048"
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Author a small connected pattern set and exercise it in server-authoritative and
|
||
local-first scenarios. Show forces, alternatives, ordering rationale, resulting
|
||
contexts and failure modes. Record gaps, then define the minimum metadata
|
||
validator and graph export needed by these examples.
|
||
|
||
|
||
## Phase acceptance
|
||
|
||
Produce 6–10 connected draft patterns, complete VC-01 and VC-02, and write
|
||
`research/reviews/M1-SeedReview.md` with evidence for each M1 criterion. Include
|
||
rejected or merged candidates and any source-access limitations. Retain hypothesis
|
||
maturity where evidence is incomplete. Handoff broader investigations to FEP-WP-0003;
|
||
metadata tooling and empirical evaluation are tracked in FEP-WP-0004.
|
||
|
||
|
||
## Readiness assessment
|
||
|
||
Self-reviewed by codex against State Hub `policies/work-item-dor.md` on
|
||
2026-09-24. Outcome: DoR-Ok for the plan structure; child tasks remain to be
|
||
assessed before execution.
|
||
|
||
- Scope: metadata reconciliation, two contrasting source reviews, 6–10 draft
|
||
patterns and VC-01/VC-02. Broad coverage, tooling implementation and real-repo
|
||
validation are outside this cycle and belong to FEP-WP-0003/0004.
|
||
- Owner and repository: codex in frontend-patterns. No external intake; this follows
|
||
the repository review and the user's research-program instruction.
|
||
- Dependencies: scaffold and templates are committed. No known blocker prevents
|
||
T01 or source discovery. T03 depends on T01/T02; inaccessible sources must be
|
||
reported and alternatives assessed rather than evidence invented.
|
||
- Execution boundary: documentation and read-only public-source research, with
|
||
ordinary Git/State Hub synchronization. Deployments, purchases and third-party
|
||
messaging are outside scope. This plan does not schedule background execution.
|
||
- Verification: schema/template agreement, traceable claims and references, two
|
||
walkthrough reviews, explicit counterevidence and the M1 acceptance review.
|
||
- Done-condition: the phase acceptance section above; hypotheses may be rejected
|
||
or deferred with reasons rather than falsely confirmed to close a task.
|