frontend-patterns/workplans/FEP-WP-0006-language-evolution.md
repo-manager 2dabcb85af repo.work.assign_missing_identifiers
source: repo-manager
reason: deterministic projection registration

Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
2026-09-27 00:00:40 +02:00

66 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown

---
id: FEP-WP-0006
type: workplan
title: "Make ongoing language learning observable"
domain: infotech
repo: frontend-patterns
status: active
owner: codex
topic_slug: canon
created: "2026-09-26"
updated: "2026-09-26"
state_hub_workstream_id: "528d24c1-c2c4-5914-a065-992b0dd877c8"
---
# Make ongoing language learning observable
User-approved baseline, learning ledger and generated evolution report. Finite
investigations support an ongoing language; no composite maturity score or automatic
promotion. M1/M2 and independent human validation remain open in WP-0002/WP-0003.
## Establish the versioned evidence baseline
```task
id: FEP-WP-0006-T01
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "a23a0de7-9f53-5135-b412-3e556725ad9b"
```
Seventeen research identities, current profiles and immutable baseline pin candidate
content and distinguish documentary/static/runtime evidence, implementation families,
review provenance and limits. Full-contract independence and historical effort remain
unknown. See research/evolution/README.md and snapshots/baseline-2026-09-26.json.
## Record learning and generate transparent reporting
```task
id: FEP-WP-0006-T02
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "5085abed-813d-585a-ba3f-b67727e93c4d"
```
Selected retrospective ledger, prospective cycle template, generated evidence/case/
usefulness report, validation and tests. Preserve the frozen pilot and all historical
experiment receipts. Intent/protocol/program now describe continuous learning.
## Measure the first comparable prospective cycles
```task
id: FEP-WP-0006-T03
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "2c5c4bae-a0a9-54bf-ac86-49b2803fdd8c"
```
Before WP-0003 T01's next navigation/history/cache investigation, register one bounded
cycle using templates/LearningCycle.md. Record effort, outcomes and counterevidence;
update profiles/report and snapshot at the review boundary. Continue with comparable
questions only where they are useful, not to meet a count target. After at least three
comparable cycles review returns within that stream/protocol; no trend claim before
then and no automatic plateau declaration. Preserve independent confirmation value.
Reconcile substantive-review dates from original artifacts; baseline assessment dates
must not fabricate freshness. Future usefulness work retains stable development anchors
and preregisters fresh tasks under WP-0004; it does not alter the consumed pilot.