Record accepted Staff evidence disposition and publisher handoff

Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6.1-sol
Assistant-Session: 01a126e1-76f8-7643-8cf3-e93336539ade
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-10-11 04:03:12 +02:00
parent 052105d61c
commit 718591919e
4 changed files with 262 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -4348,3 +4348,69 @@ through `AUDIT-IN-0006`. `audit-core` referred the statute question here instead
of deciding it in the registration, and said plainly that preferring withholding
was not its to say. The 2026-10-03 reply stated the reading and left the conflict
open. This record closes it by refusal.
## GH-DEC-2026-025 — Carry the deterministic presentation evidence tension explicitly and hand off the requested catalogue row
```yaml
id: GH-DEC-2026-025
kind: decision
title: Carry the deterministic presentation evidence tension explicitly and hand off the requested catalogue row
status: resolved
owner: Bernd Worsch
repo: gate-house
created: '2026-10-11'
updated: '2026-10-11'
decided_by: Bernd Worsch
source_note: GH-WP-0004-T06-r1; native human memo infd-20261011-staff-evidence-tension version 1
native_review_id: review-2e615985-54c9-40d8-8547-b8fdcb10b1d6
native_approval_id: d90c899b-f25c-4e66-a003-808ee5b1324f
native_disposition_id: disp-24e94200-ed93-4a18-900c-3128d26ba212
proposal_sha256: 08bc78a29c2b67cec0aafba993fb2d25312b629ecccb81458980baafe38e566a
submission_digest: sha256:d2224fb5f8e577b1dd45b73fb01bf6c8880f1e7e167945e3a186b23738742609
affects: [gate-house, informed-decision, net-kingdom, audit-core, policy-nexus]
rationale: >-
Confirmed native human ACCEPT of the exact bounded carried-tension proposal
for source-owner review and successor publication. Retain the ruled Staff /
PEP-shaped classification; propose the requested catalogue row with evidence
source yes, and keep the actual section 3.4 tension and owed per-event
load-bearing guarantees visible. This does not ratify a whole successor
standard, edit accepted v0.8, authorize deployment or certify runtime evidence.
```
### Confirmed disposition and exact scope
The native outcome records a confirmed person `accept` at 2026-10-11T01:46:25Z,
actor `uid=platform-root,ou=people,dc=netkingdom,dc=local`, against memo version 1,
review `review-2e615985-54c9-40d8-8547-b8fdcb10b1d6`; the review is not stale.
The approval and disposition above identify the actual human act. The
[retained evidence receipt](../docs/evidence/2026-10-11-staff-evidence-human-disposition.json)
preserves the exact submitted packet and native outcome. Gate House records this
human disposition; it performs neither the human act nor a new NetKingdom review.
The approved instrument is the immutable
[GH-WP-0004-T06-r1 proposal](../docs/amendments/informed-decision-staff-evidence-disposition-proposal.md)
at its recorded digest, including its exact candidate §3.4 and §4 wording,
alternatives and recording limits. It approves **carrying** the incompatibility,
not claiming it solved: deterministic presentation evidence still does not fit the
absolute Staff wording. Catalogue membership identifies obligations; it is not
conformance. GH-DEC-2026-012/014/017/021/024 remain intact as prior decisions.
### Source-owner handoff and retained obligations
The [source-owner handoff](../docs/amendments/2026-10-11-staff-evidence-disposition-handoff.md)
extracts the approved wording for NetKingdom's proposed successor revision.
The prior distinct NetKingdom technical review in the native packet is not whole
revision ratification or serving publication. Accepted v0.8 SHA256
`3d8298560069ef471fba28d2b1245fb2309328f231dad1a667cdf0ce5a5a7c8b`
remains immutable. The permitted next work is source-owner follow-through and
proposed successor publication; later acceptance and delivery retain their own gates.
`INFD-IN-0007` remains open until the standard's accepted voice actually carries the
answer, as the approved packet says. The Staff/evidence fit remains a visible
unresolved finding even after that answer. `presentation` stays load-bearing/volume;
`disposition` and `stance-application` stay load-bearing/rare. Independent evidence,
per-class detection/reconciliation and existing fail-closed local evidence duties
are not waived. Source-owner implementation records, not this doctrine decision,
prove actual emission operation. Nothing here permits approval-current-state caches,
a second PDP, direct Tooling access, a blanket Staff state exemption or a new layer.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
# GH-DEC-2026-025 — source-owner follow-through handoff
Status: accepted bounded doctrine disposition; **publisher follow-through pending**.
Origin: existing `GH-WP-0004-T06`; no new workplan or foreign implementation tasks.
Founder accepted GH-WP-0004-T06-r1 exactly at proposal SHA256
`08bc78a29c2b67cec0aafba993fb2d25312b629ecccb81458980baafe38e566a`
and submitted-envelope digest
`d2224fb5f8e577b1dd45b73fb01bf6c8880f1e7e167945e3a186b23738742609`.
See GH-DEC-2026-025 and the retained native human disposition receipt. No broader
standard revision was ratified. NetKingdom retains its source-owner role; this
handoff does not write a NetKingdom review or pretend it accepted the whole cut.
## Exact approved candidate text for a proposed successor source
Apply only in a proposed successor revision after founder disposition and publisher
review. Do not overwrite accepted v0.8. Sections not identified here are unchanged.
### A. §3.4: insert after “Acting at runtime does not make a repository an Engine. Being agentic makes it Staff, and §5 governs how it acts.”
> **Carried tension — deterministic presentation evidence.** `informed-decision`
> retains its ruled `Staff` / `PEP-shaped` classification (`GH-DEC-2026-012` R1,
> `GH-DEC-2026-017` §3). Its deterministic presentation and retention of evidence
> for `audit-core` do not fit this section's non-determinism description and
> prohibition on runtime-dependent state. This standard records that tension
> explicitly; it does not reinterpret those requirements as already satisfied.
> Its §4 row admits it to the conformance scope, not to a claim of conformance.
>
> A conformance report concerning this repository MUST state the §3.4 tension
> as unresolved and MUST NOT report the repository as wholly conforming solely
> because its layer declaration agrees or its pin detector passes. This is a
> repository-specific disposition, not a fifth layer or an exemption allowing
> other Staff repositories to hold Engine decision state.
>
> The existing boundaries remain binding: `informed-decision` MUST NOT render
> or cache an authorization verdict, hold approval current-state, decide
> approval validity or consume approvals. Its presentation claim MUST NOT be
> an input to the authorization decision it presents for; `view_hash` MUST NOT
> replace the approval-engine binding digest. The evidence copy MUST have the
> independent path required by `GH-DEC-2026-012` R2 limit 3. Emission guarantees
> remain owed under §9.6 and §11, per declared event class. This carried tension
> grants no permission to omit or downgrade load-bearing evidence, bypass an
> Engine, or continue an operation where a mandatory local evidence record
> cannot be made. The §3.4 tension remains visible until a later argued model
> revision resolves it; recording the tension is the answer to `INFD-IN-0007`,
> not a claim that the tension has disappeared.
### B. §4: add after the approval-engine row
| Repository | Layer | Role | Owns | Evidence source |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `informed-decision` | Staff | PEP-shaped | human presentation and binding surface; presentation evidence emission; §3.4 carried tension; approval state remains approval-engine's | yes |
### C. §4: replace the evidence-source values paragraph
> The column carries exactly `yes`, `no`, or `unassessed`: `access-engine` and
> `informed-decision` are `yes`, `audit-core` is `no`, and all other rows remain
> `unassessed` until assessed. `—` is not a value. The §11 check reports
> `unassessed` as unassessed, never as conforming or as not a source
> (`GH-DEC-2026-024` §2). Catalog membership and an evidence-source marking
> identify the obligations to check; neither certifies that they are met.
### D. §4: insert after that paragraph
> `informed-decision` publishes three load-bearing event classes:
> `presentation` (volume), `disposition` (rare), and `stance-application` (rare).
> The volume class permits rate monitoring with positive window and minimum,
> together with reconciliation; the rare classes require heartbeat and
> reconciliation, not rate monitoring alone. Its source declaration currently
> records the emission guarantee as owed and not yet declarable. Until an
> actual guarantee and its verification are returned by the source, a §11 run
> MUST report it as owed/not declared, not as conforming or complete. Completing
> those guarantees does not by itself resolve the separate §3.4 tension.
## Owner destinations and completion boundary
NetKingdom: receive this handoff in an existing source-owner work record, assemble
the exact bounded candidate in a proposed successor revision, retain accepted v0.8
unchanged, and separately obtain acceptance for that revision as required. No live
message is sent by this worker; the parent coordinator applies and routes the record.
PolicyNexus: subsequent accepted-revision delivery belongs to its existing owner
publication route, not to Gate House runtime execution.
InformedDecision: existing `INFD-IN-0007` is the live doctrine-response record.
Finished `INFD-WP-0007` (Workspace, publication and independent evidence)
and `INFD-WP-0005` (existing ledger/outbox, scheduled delivery and audit commitments)
retain historical implementation/evidence receipts, not live unfinished tasks.
The coordinator must obtain a current source-owner live record for any remaining
class-specific declaration/operation reconciliation before closing a workplan
with that residual; Gate House does not create or assign foreign tasks. This handoff does not duplicate those tasks,
re-open finished work solely from stale declaration metadata, or infer whole-class
emission completeness from delivered runtime rows. Its `layer.yaml` still declares
the three load-bearing event classes and guarantee owed/not yet declarable; source
owner must reconcile declared readiness with actual class-specific receipts before
any conformance report upgrades that finding. Historical AUDIT-WP-0009 pointers
in evidence-path design remain history rather than freshly verified live blockers.
A confirmed local outbox or native human bind is not independent custody, complete
emission or honest display. GH-DEC-2026-014's commitment/content-availability limit
and compromised-surface residual remain. The carried Staff finding is not scored
closed by source declaration/pin PASS.
Gate House T06 currently remains progress: human disposition is recorded and the
exact candidate row/text is handed off in its own source, but source-owner receipt
and accepted standard voice remain pending. INFD-IN-0007 is not falsely closed.
When the receiving owner retains real publication work, the parent can distinguish
completion of Gate House handoff from the still-pending standard adoption and update
T06 only within its recorded completion boundary.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
{
"record": "GH-DEC-2026-025",
"proposal": "GH-WP-0004-T06-r1",
"proposal_sha256": "08bc78a29c2b67cec0aafba993fb2d25312b629ecccb81458980baafe38e566a",
"submission_digest": "sha256:d2224fb5f8e577b1dd45b73fb01bf6c8880f1e7e167945e3a186b23738742609",
"native_memo_sha256": "28e006f53f695f85e99fda2fb5f461d11f31e4541b1c9239e12e1efc5eeb0de4",
"native_packet": [
{
"item_id": "infd-20261011-staff-evidence-tension-packet",
"label": "Exact doctrine proposal with candidate text and source receipts",
"hash": "sha256:08bc78a29c2b67cec0aafba993fb2d25312b629ecccb81458980baafe38e566a"
},
{
"item_id": "infd-20261011-staff-evidence-tension-source-owner-review",
"label": "NetKingdom technical owner review",
"hash": "sha256:70a58c10f44332ed53bbfbd6f74f3ee426896edb1e5b925dac6437a8c8444ce3"
},
{
"item_id": "infd-20261011-staff-evidence-tension-sources",
"label": "Exact historical source receipts",
"hash": "sha256:e2d109b1e49b2fbcebe5d4e2b70e61a485020d47bd96c2af868ea7ae7a535323"
}
],
"retained_outcome": {
"memo_id": "infd-20261011-staff-evidence-tension",
"review": {
"intake_state": "ready",
"memo_id": "review-2e615985-54c9-40d8-8547-b8fdcb10b1d6",
"path": "/review?memo_id=review-2e615985-54c9-40d8-8547-b8fdcb10b1d6",
"stale": false
},
"disposition_count": 1,
"dispositions": [
{
"id": null,
"approval_id": null,
"submission_state": "confirmed",
"disposition": {
"actor": {
"kind": "person",
"sub": "uid=platform-root,ou=people,dc=netkingdom,dc=local"
},
"approval_id": "d90c899b-f25c-4e66-a003-808ee5b1324f",
"at": "2026-10-11T01:46:25Z",
"id": "disp-24e94200-ed93-4a18-900c-3128d26ba212",
"memo_id": "review-2e615985-54c9-40d8-8547-b8fdcb10b1d6",
"memo_version": 1,
"note": null,
"presentation_id": "pres-f44a4a5d-6998-422c-b46e-da7af46906f6",
"reasons": [],
"verb": "accept"
},
"approved_at": "2026-10-11T01:46:25+00:00",
"decided_at": null
}
]
},
"authority_scope": "Confirmed native human acceptance of exact bounded doctrine proposal for source-owner follow-through. Not whole v0.9 ratification, accepted v0.8 edit, deployment, credentials or runtime conformity.",
"verification": {
"proposal_and_submission_pins": "matched",
"confirmed_human_accept": "matched",
"memo_version": 1,
"review_stale": false
},
"carry_forward": [
"Unresolved Staff/deterministic-evidence finding",
"Per-event load-bearing guarantees still owed; no runtime verification from this receipt",
"INFD-IN-0007 remains pending accepted standard voice; catalogue row pending publisher follow-through"
]
}

View file

@ -152,6 +152,22 @@ reported honestly. Exact candidate text and alternatives are reviewable. No foun
answer, source-owner assent, model publication or runtime evidence is inferred;
INFD-IN-0007 and T06 remain open pending real disposition and row handoff.
2026-10-11 (confirmed human disposition): native memo
`infd-20261011-staff-evidence-tension@1`, review
`review-2e615985-54c9-40d8-8547-b8fdcb10b1d6`, is confirmed ACCEPT, non-stale,
by human platform-root at 01:46:25Z; approval
`d90c899b-f25c-4e66-a003-808ee5b1324f`, disposition
`disp-24e94200-ed93-4a18-900c-3128d26ba212`.
Recorded as `GH-DEC-2026-025`, pinned to original proposal SHA256
`08bc78a29c2b67cec0aafba993fb2d25312b629ecccb81458980baafe38e566a`
and exact submission `d2224fb5f8e577b1dd45b73fb01bf6c8880f1e7e167945e3a186b23738742609`.
The [exact candidate row/text handoff](../docs/amendments/2026-10-11-staff-evidence-disposition-handoff.md)
is prepared for NetKingdom source-owner follow-through. Acceptance is only the
bounded doctrine disposition, not whole v0.9 ratification, accepted-v0.8 edit or live
execution. T06 stays progress pending real publisher receipt/standard-voice adoption;
INFD-IN-0007 and the Staff finding are not closed from a human memo alone.
Per-event emission obligations stay with their existing source-owner records.
```task
id: GH-WP-0004-T06
status: progress