CLAUDE.md

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ has lapsed — see the re-cut below.
 
 Gate House is the **council where NetKingdom's security and defence doctrine is
 established, documented, taught, and supervised** — a **Staff**-layer repository in the
-NetKingdom security layer model (`net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.2.md`, accepted).
+NetKingdom security layer model (`net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.1.md`).
 It holds no runtime position and renders no authorization decision.
 
 > **The mandate and the operating mode are Gate House's. The decision is access-engine's.
@@ -141,8 +141,7 @@ the file, commit, then sync. `SCOPE.md` is derived from `INTENT.md` — keep the
 - History and reference notes → `history/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md`, matching the convention in
   ops-warden, zone-engine, and secrets-engine.
 - Doctrine that stabilizes graduates into `net-kingdom/canon/standards/`, owned by gate-house
-  and published by net-kingdom. `security-layer-model_v0.2.md` is the first, and is accepted:
+  and published by net-kingdom. `security-layer-model_v0.1.md` is the first.
-  all three affected repositories assented, each returning a finding that changed it.
 - **No implementation layout.** Blueprint §32's reference tree (`api/`, `policy/`, `grants/`,
   `deploy/`, …) described the withdrawn engine and does not apply. If work here starts
   producing services, schemas that resolve, or anything evaluated at request time, stop —

README.md

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ anything depends on at runtime.
 
 NetKingdom's IT security is layered by determinism and by the kind of artifact
 each layer produces — see
-[`net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.2.md`](../net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.2.md).
+[`net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.1.md`](../net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.1.md).
 
 ```text
 Taxonomy   cross-cutting language          info-tech-canon, net-kingdom canon

history/2026-08-28-security-layer-model-and-gate-house-recut.md

@@ -240,34 +240,3 @@ Open:
 3. Adapt the other `INTENT.md` files that need clarification, and seek assent
    from flex-auth and ops-warden for the boundaries in §7.
 4. Rewrite `GH-WP-0001`; revise the Blueprint per §10.
-
----
-
-## 12. Outcome — assent, and what it changed
-
-Added 2026-08-28, after the review closed.
-
-Assent was requested as intakes in the owning repositories (`FLEX-IN-0001`,
-`KG-IN-0001`, `WARDEN-IN-0001`) with State Hub notification. All three assented,
-each with its own decision record, and each returned a finding:
-
-- **flex-auth** (`FLEX-DEC-2026-001`) — assent to all three items, reasoning
-  that it *"cannot hold this boundary against zone-engine and decline it as a
-  general rule"*. Self-declared a non-conformance: `DecisionProvenance` carries
-  no digest of the registry snapshot, so a decision turning on registry content
-  is not replayable from its own provenance. Drew one boundary back at
-  gate-house: an authority ceiling that determines an outcome must reach the
-  decision as an input claim or a versioned policy rule.
-- **kings-guard** (`KG-DEC-2026-001`) — assent, and **declined the offered
-  relaxation of §5**, arguing that latency and blast radius both argue for
-  keeping it and that a containment path bypassing the decision point becomes an
-  authority path the moment it is subverted. Raised the real defect instead: §4
-  catalogued containment while §5 forbade the only route to discharging it.
-- **ops-warden** (`ADR-0010`) — assent to all three; the access-engine veto was
-  not exercised. Grepped §5 as invited and self-reported a signing write to
-  OpenBao. Offered the amendment that became §5.3.
-
-The standard was revised to **v0.2** and accepted. Three of the four changes
-came from the assenting repositories rather than from gate-house; the
-conformance loop in §12 of that standard turned on first contact, which is the
-only evidence so far against this repository's paper-generator falsifier.

workplans/GH-WP-0001-foundation.md

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ the ruling in GH-DEC-2026-001, and the model in
 
 ```task
 id: GH-WP-0001-T03
-status: done
+status: progress
 priority: high
 state_hub_task_id: "12f651be-1c07-587b-a781-4472e189e218"
 ```