gate-house/workplans/GH-WP-0001-foundation.md
tegwick 78ee1c0b8a Record GH-WP-0001-T06 handoff and wait gate
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-5.6-sol
Assistant-Session: 01a05e30-2884-71b0-98d7-7edd16ae737b
2026-09-01 20:48:33 +02:00

127 lines
5 KiB
Markdown

---
id: GH-WP-0001
type: workplan
title: "Foundation"
domain: infotech
repo: gate-house
status: active
state_hub_workstream_id: "2ec4cf1a-a73f-5793-9738-8d8019cccca8"
updated: "2026-09-01"
---
# Foundation
Establish Gate House as the Staff-layer doctrine council: the layer model in
canon, the re-cut recorded, the authority context published as a contract
access-engine consumes, and the conformance loop turning.
Rewritten 2026-08-28 against `decisions/decisions.md` GH-DEC-2026-001. The
previous plan targeted Blueprint milestone **M0** — an `/authorize` skeleton —
which lapsed with the re-cut. No service is built in this repository.
```task
id: GH-WP-0001-T01
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "af0fa778-89a8-52cf-a73a-021082a98cad"
```
Establish the repository baseline: classification, scope, agent instructions,
workplan spine. Done — `rmgr conform` passes with no findings.
```task
id: GH-WP-0001-T02
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "6dd21d86-6546-58a7-b59e-fa1db72aae90"
```
Settle the boundary with access-engine and the security estate, and record it.
Done — the review is in `history/2026-08-28-security-layer-model-and-gate-house-recut.md`,
the ruling in GH-DEC-2026-001, and the model in
`net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.1.md` (proposed).
```task
id: GH-WP-0001-T03
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "12f651be-1c07-587b-a781-4472e189e218"
```
Obtain assent for the boundaries that move vocabulary away from repositories
currently using it. Requested 2026-08-28 as intakes in the owning repositories,
with State Hub inbox notification — the intake is the inbound channel, so each
repository triages and promotes into its own work structure rather than having
work created for it:
- `FLEX-IN-0001` — Engine framing, the access-engine rename, and the
authoring/evaluation split. INTENT reframe applied; rename not authorized.
- `KG-IN-0001` — Staff placement, "control plane" as Engine vocabulary, and the
posture asymmetry.
- `WARDEN-IN-0001` — Staff placement, doctrine versus runbook, the access
lane/rule demarcation, and adding gate-house to the routing tables.
Awaiting response. Assent, revision, or rejection are all acceptable outcomes;
a rejection that names a practical failure is the more valuable answer. Promote
the standard from `proposed` to `accepted` once the three have answered.
```task
id: GH-WP-0001-T04
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "7903d142-9763-5b3f-839d-2a1599130a2b"
```
Publish the **authority context** as a contract: principal, actor, runtime
identity, tenant, environment, mandate, task, operating mode — the vocabulary
access-engine consumes as input claims alongside verified identity claims.
Record it as ADR-001 and ADR-002. This is the deliverable that makes the
doctrine consumable rather than descriptive.
Done — `docs/contracts/authority-context.md` publishes
`authority-context.v1` as the logical claims contract, with mode-specific
requiredness, authoritative binding, fail-closed, evidence, and versioning
rules. `docs/adr/ADR-001-canonical-authority-context-contract.md` and
`docs/adr/ADR-002-principal-actor-runtime-identity-model.md` record the contract
boundary and the three-role identity model.
```task
id: GH-WP-0001-T05
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "010e3162-cab1-5644-b262-b0d1d7d676f8"
```
Revise `ArchitectureBlueprint.md`: fold the surviving material — domain model,
authority context, operating modes, posture and credential contracts, MCP
doctrine, change dynamics, audit, architectural invariants — into doctrine form,
and retire the withdrawn sections from the working document into design history.
Currently marked in place with a status banner.
Done — `ArchitectureBlueprint.md` v0.2 is a current doctrine architecture with
no Gate House runtime role. The complete v0.1 remains recoverable at Git object
`75ce372:ArchitectureBlueprint.md`; its section-by-section disposition is in
`history/2026-09-01-authority-plane-blueprint-retirement.md`. Derivative README
and agent guidance now point to the current document.
```task
id: GH-WP-0001-T06
status: wait
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "8cc018e1-2787-5435-9c2c-c2b01cf75ae4"
```
Close the conformance loop. Hand the assurance specifications T-01…T-10 to
whitehat-security as executable targets, agree the posture and findings return
path with kings-guard, and establish how conformance review reports back. Until
this turns, Gate House is a paper generator by its own falsifier.
Waiting on the first return — Gate House's side is published at commit
`8cb7250`. The executable target set and reporting contract were handed to
whitehat-security in State Hub message `8229c9a4-862f-4d55-842c-5c95702f79d9`;
the posture/findings contract, grounded in `KG-DEC-2026-001` and `KG-WP-0003`,
was handed to kings-guard in message
`50d392ad-b342-4e90-85e7-d4c5495f3671`. T06 becomes done after a calibrated
whitehat result, kings-guard's return-path disposition/status, and Gate House's
first recorded doctrine disposition. Full record:
`history/2026-09-01-conformance-loop-handoff.md`.