tegwick
7d487d7337
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3775@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: cfacb6a5-ad5b-4f79-ac67-053e3b0d34a3
1.5 KiB
| id | type | title | domain | repo | status | owner | topic_slug | created | updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GH-WP-ADHOC-2026-10-03 | workplan | Ad hoc 2026-10-03 — review of railiance-clock requests | infotech | gate-house | finished | codex | infotech | 2026-10-03 | 2026-10-03 |
Review railiance-clock's three 2026-09-14 requests (RCLK-WP-0002-T01)
id: GH-WP-ADHOC-2026-10-03-T01
status: done
priority: high
Dispatched under CUST-WP-0075. Reviewed railiance-clock@6a9c0db (INTENT.md,
docs/identity-and-utc-review.md, docs/closeout-review-2026-09-28.md,
specs/sample-profile-v0.1.md). This was a doctrine review against INTENT § Core
Rules, docs/contracts/authority-context.md, GH-DEC-2026-001/-017 and
security-layer-model v0.7. Replies went to railiance-clock as hub messages
f1d7ba98 (foundation), 7071237a (identity/UTC) and 817f0672 (sample profile).
Outcome: the layer: Tooling declaration conforms to GH-DEC-2026-017.
railiance-clock is outside the §4 catalog, so the review needs no checker change and
no declaration entry here. The findings are for other owners: the runtime_identity
mapping in the receipt (net-kingdom NK-WP-0040), the unnamed trust-distribution
owner (T02), the consumer no-wall-clock-fallback obligation (T04 consumers), and the
missing RCLK-WP entry in repo-manager's prefix registry.
Pending, not opened: if a named consumer later depends on the sample API, re-declaring railiance-clock as an Engine in the PIP role needs a §4 catalog row. That requires a gate-house decision record and a normal workplan, opened at that time and not before.