informed-decision filed three rulings before writing any architecture, with candidate answers, their costs, the self-dealing objection argued against itself, and a list of what it was not asking for. That order is what section 17 exists to produce, and KEY-WP-0013-T02 is blocked today, so it is answered now rather than queued. R1 — PEP-shaped, confirmed as proposed, not an Engine. It holds no state another layer reads at runtime for a verdict, which is the test. Its layer stays its own to declare; this settles its shape, which is what was blocking. It should build to v0.8's obligation 3 rather than v0.7's and inherit GH-DEC-2026-010's attribution gap knowingly rather than describe its validation as complete. R2 — yes, and no second catalog row. PEP and PIP are shapes a repository has; the catalog records layers it occupies. Obligation 5 forbids a PIP republishing the PDP's decision, which is a prohibition on republishing a decision, not on holding two shapes. Three limits carry the permission: the claim carries presentation and nothing else, it must never be an input to the decision it presents for, and its evidence copy reaches audit-core independently of the emitter. The last is the one that matters here, because the actor and the source are the same component. R3 — candidate (b). The binding digest is authoritative for what the request is; view_hash only for what was shown; a disagreement between them is a finding against the presenting surface, never a fact about the request. (a) is refused doctrinally rather than on the cost given: merging the two makes one repository the authority on what another layer computes over a request, which is GH-DEC-2026-008's objection to translation. (c) is refused because nesting the binding digest inside view_hash reproduces the hash cycle that made GH-DEC-2026-008 unimplementable — we paid for that lesson once this quarter. The two link by co-reference instead: the presentation record names the binding identifier and never recomputes the other layer's digest. The residual is not closed and the ruling says so, as they asked. A compromised surface can present X and attest Y. Attestation covers accident and later tampering, never a compromised source — the same disposition approval-engine's equivalent takes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012viPor8WJNCbV64ipwewrm Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1754332@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 9c8ac536-ff5e-46a3-8ab1-a548bde25fc0
3.4 KiB
3.4 KiB
Work Records — gate-house
Generated by
statehub fix-consistency(CUST-WP-0061-T04, work-record stage 3). Do not edit by hand — edit the source file/block listed for each record and re-run fix-consistency to refresh this index. Archived workplans are omitted; closed decisions/intakes/engagements stay listed so recently-resolved work is still visible. [auto]
| Kind | ID | Status | Lane | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| workplan | GH-WP-0001 | finished | — | workplans/GH-WP-0001-foundation.md |
| workplan | GH-WP-0002 | finished | — | workplans/GH-WP-0002-approval-evidence-integrity.md |
| workplan | GH-WP-0003 | finished | — | workplans/GH-WP-0003-statute-v08-amendment-set.md |
| task | GH-WP-0001-T01 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0001-foundation.md |
| task | GH-WP-0001-T02 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0001-foundation.md |
| task | GH-WP-0001-T03 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0001-foundation.md |
| task | GH-WP-0001-T04 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0001-foundation.md |
| task | GH-WP-0001-T05 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0001-foundation.md |
| task | GH-WP-0001-T06 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0001-foundation.md |
| task | GH-WP-0002-T01 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0002-approval-evidence-integrity.md |
| task | GH-WP-0002-T02 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0002-approval-evidence-integrity.md |
| task | GH-WP-0002-T03 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0002-approval-evidence-integrity.md |
| task | GH-WP-0002-T04 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0002-approval-evidence-integrity.md |
| task | GH-WP-0002-T05 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0002-approval-evidence-integrity.md |
| task | GH-WP-0002-T06 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0002-approval-evidence-integrity.md |
| task | GH-WP-0003-T01 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0003-statute-v08-amendment-set.md |
| task | GH-WP-0003-T02 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0003-statute-v08-amendment-set.md |
| task | GH-WP-0003-T03 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0003-statute-v08-amendment-set.md |
| task | GH-WP-0003-T04 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0003-statute-v08-amendment-set.md |
| task | GH-WP-0003-T05 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0003-statute-v08-amendment-set.md |
| task | GH-WP-0003-T06 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0003-statute-v08-amendment-set.md |
| task | GH-WP-0003-T07 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0003-statute-v08-amendment-set.md |
| task | GH-WP-0003-T08 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0003-statute-v08-amendment-set.md |
| task | GH-WP-0003-T09 | done | — | workplans/GH-WP-0003-statute-v08-amendment-set.md |
| intake | GH-IN-0001 | closed | red | intakes/intakes.md |
| intake | GH-IN-0002 | closed | red | intakes/intakes.md |
| decision | GH-DEC-2026-001 | resolved | — | decisions/decisions.md |
| decision | GH-DEC-2026-002 | resolved | — | decisions/decisions.md |
| decision | GH-DEC-2026-003 | resolved | — | decisions/decisions.md |
| decision | GH-DEC-2026-004 | resolved | — | decisions/decisions.md |
| decision | GH-DEC-2026-005 | resolved | — | decisions/decisions.md |
| decision | GH-DEC-2026-006 | resolved | — | decisions/decisions.md |
| decision | GH-DEC-2026-007 | resolved | — | decisions/decisions.md |
| decision | GH-DEC-2026-008 | resolved | — | decisions/decisions.md |
| decision | GH-DEC-2026-009 | resolved | — | decisions/decisions.md |
| decision | GH-DEC-2026-010 | resolved | — | decisions/decisions.md |
| decision | GH-DEC-2026-011 | resolved | — | decisions/decisions.md |