Finish ITC-WP-0013 (AttributeValueType under ITC-DATA) and ITC-WP-0014 T02/T03/T05/T06/T07. Capability contract schemas, live-catalog review CLI, landscape/kernel-map pointers. Sit on this version.
14 KiB
Changelog — InfoTechCanon
Canon versions and their change notes. Entries follow the ChangeRecord shape of
InfoTechCanonCore §8.13: what changed, rationale, whether it is breaking, and
what produced it.
Versioning of canon.yaml → version:
- patch — editorial or generated-output changes; no concept change
- minor — new artifact, new concepts, backward-compatible extension
- major — a concept is removed, renamed, or its ownership moves
Canonical identifiers are durable interfaces; any break requires migration semantics.
0.6.0 — 2026-08-15
Frozen — ITC-CAP draft; AttributeValueType catalog; joinable review
Change. Canon 0.6.0 is the freeze cut.
- ITC-CAP promoted from
proposedtodraft. Contract schemas published:capability.schema.yaml(catalog) andcapability-record.schema.yaml(requirement/provision records).make validateenforces CAP-R8 on the catalog. - Capability-review surface:
info-tech-canon capability-review PATHandGET /capability-review?path=join a consumer record to the live catalog (OQ-6 / ITC-WP-0014 T06). - Mappings:
infospace/mappings/capability-anchors.yamlformalizes the assimilation mappings (T03). - Landscape §11.4 and Kernel Map §4.14 now point at ITC-CAP (T05).
- AttributeValueType catalog under ITC-DATA
(
models/data/attribute-value-types.yaml) fromdemand/AttributeValueTypes.md(ITC-WP-0013). citation-evidence alignment note published.
ITC-WP-0013 and ITC-WP-0014 are finished. T04 (small-saas illustration) remains optional and does not block the freeze.
Rationale. One consumer cycle has refined the capability model; a second consumer needed a closed capture-type catalog. Further shape change of ITC-CAP needs a new minor. 0.6.0 is the version to sit on.
Breaking: no capability id or AttributeValueType id invented as a break. New catalogs and schemas only.
Validation. make validate 0 errors / 0 warnings; make test 23 passed.
0.5.0 — 2026-08-15
Added — Provision-to-provision relationships (uses_provisions)
Change. A CapabilityProvision may name the provisions it relies on
under uses_provisions. Each entry is a catalog capability, a consumer
landscape provider reference, and a relation of depends_on or
may_use — the existing capability-to-capability vocabulary, not a new
one. A depends_on entry MUST be declared between those capabilities in
the catalog; a may_use entry SHOULD. Using another capability is not
consuming class P (CAP-R11).
data.backup gains catalog may_use: security.secrets, from the
resource-control restatement. Maturity is not derived or capped across
the dependency.
EvidenceBasis tiers are refined in the same cut: invoiced and
measured remain peers (observed); quoted sits below them for
propagation and still counts as evidenced for decision grades. The
consumer found that a strict list order made an invoice outrank a
measurement.
Rationale. The catalog can say data.backup depends_on data.object;
a provision could not say which object provision satisfies that for
it. The leftover was a consumes:P row for OpenBao credential custody —
the wrong kind, and the start of P widening again after finding C
narrowed it. Filed as demand/ProvisionRelationships.md.
Breaking: no capability id changed. New optional field on the
still-proposed provision record. Consumers who wrote relation: uses
should spell it may_use.
Records. ADHOC-2026-08-15 T03; demand accepted.
Validation. make validate 0 errors / 0 warnings; make test 22 passed.
0.4.0 — 2026-08-15
Changed — Joinable consumer proof counts for ITC-CAP promotion
Change. ITC-CAP §10.3 no longer requires a canon Profile as the only
form of "a real capability requirement set with evidence." A consumer
record that validates against the live catalog and is cited from
feedback/ is a proof. Operational facts stay in the consumer repo; the
join is the capability id.
Met by resource-control data/capability/platform-audit-storage.json
(commit 13c2b82), cited in
feedback/2026-08-15-resource-control-cap-restatement.md. Requirement
data.backup D5 is below_requirement at provision D4; all four backup
hooks are measured. ITC-WP-0014 T11 done; T04 (small-saas illustration)
no longer blocks T07.
Rationale. A fictional in-repo example is a weaker proof than a joinable provision that already fails or passes against this catalog.
Breaking: no.
Added — EvidenceBasis (ITC-GOV), required on CapabilityConsumption
Change. ITC-GOV gains EvidenceBasis: a closed vocabulary for how a
quantity was obtained, in tiers rather than a total order
(evidenced: invoiced / measured / quoted; then projected; then
judgement: estimated / assumed; then unknown). A derived value
resolves to the weakest tier among its inputs. Unknown-is-not-zero.
Optional proxy_for / observed_at. Decision grades (evidenced /
projected / indicative / insufficient). Catalog:
infospace/models/governance/evidence-basis.yaml. ITC-CAP 0.3.0 imports
it; CAP-R10 requires basis on every consumption row.
Rationale. Native units without a basis still let an assumed hour and
a measured gigabyte sit in one list as the same kind of knowledge. The
consumer's first application graded a €29.14/month provider comparison
indicative. A private scale would diverge the moment a second
repository reports provision economics — the same argument accepted for
class H.
Ownership. ITC-GOV Evidence, not a CAP-only dialect. invoiced names
a fin-hub booked fact; this canon does not originate booked costs. Not
the OQ-3 state qualifier.
Breaking: no capability id changed. New required field on consumption records of the still-proposed capability model.
Records. demand/EvidenceBasis.md; ITC-WP-0015 finished.
Validation. make validate 0 errors / 0 warnings; make test 22 passed.
0.3.0 — 2026-08-15
Changed — Capability provision economics (requirement targets, native-unit consumption, class H)
Change. The still-proposed Capability Model (ITC-CAP) moves from 0.1.0 to
0.2.0 in response to consumer demand demand/CapabilityProvisionEconomics.md
(resource-control, a completed procurement-to-control cycle).
- Contracts no longer declare
typical_resource_classes. Resource consumption attaches to a provision only (new CAP-R8), matching the rule §4.11 already stated. - CapabilityRequirement may select a profile, assert intended quality
targets against the capability's declared dimensions, and state placement
constraints with a closed predicate set (
not_in,in,equals,lte,gte). Measurement remains with ITC-LAND / ITC-OBS (new CAP-R9). - Resource classes gain
H(Human Effort, native unithour, default supplyinternal, default capacityconstrained).Pis narrowed to purchased platform and enabling services and no longer absorbs human time.Iis recharacterised as the elastic purchased substitute forH, native unittoken. Every class declaresnative_unit,supply, andcapacity_behaviour; a consumption record may override the last two. - CapabilityConsumption is a new owned concept: one native-unit row on a
provision. Unknown is recorded as
unknown, never as zero. Currency is not a class. Nosubstitutes_forrelation and no H↔I exchange rate. - Quality dimension
intelligence_intensityis declared on all fiveintelligence.*capabilities.
Rationale. The catalog, evidence hooks, and D-scale independently matched
the consumer's backup evidence. The three defects were cheapest to fix before
capability.schema.yaml freezes the contract and before the consumer restates
the real provision. Splitting ITC-CAP into demand-side and supply-side canons
was considered and rejected: both sides agree about what exists.
Breaking: no capability id, anchor, profile (except the new dimension on
intelligence.*), evidence hook, or relationship type changed.
typical_resource_classes is removed from the catalog; it was never a durable
interface.
Records. Decision record in
assimilation/it-capability-canon/ASSIMILATION.md; OQ-5 notes a partial fire;
ITC-WP-0014 T08–T10 done.
Validation. make validate 0 errors / 0 warnings; make test 22 passed.
0.2.1 — 2026-08-15
Changed — Capability navigation domains split (OQ-2 resolved)
Change. The security navigation domain ("Security & Governance") is split
into security (security.secrets, security.keys, security.policy,
security.vulnerability) and governance (governance.evidence,
governance.lifecycle). The baseline is now 41 capabilities across 9
navigation domains.
Rationale. Four capabilities in the domain used the security. prefix while
two used governance.. Capability ids are durable interfaces (CAP-R5), so the
mismatch could not be corrected later without migration semantics, and it blocked
promotion of ITC-CAP beyond proposed. Navigation domains are declared
navigation_only: true and carry no semantics, so splitting one is a
table-of-contents change.
Options rejected. Keeping the mismatch (leaves a defect in the model's primary
index); renumbering governance.* to security.* (breaks two durable interfaces
for a cosmetic gain, requiring a major version).
Breaking: no. No capability id, anchor, profile, quality dimension, evidence hook, or relationship changed. Artifact count, schemas, and consumers are unaffected.
Records. Decision record in
infospace/assimilation/it-capability-canon/ASSIMILATION.md; OQ-2 closed in
open-questions.md; ITC-WP-0014 T01 done.
Validation. make validate 0 errors / 0 warnings; make test 22 passed.
0.2.0 — 2026-08-14
Added — InfoTechCanon Capability Model (ITC-CAP)
Change. The canon gains a twelfth domain model,
infospace/models/capability/InfoTechCanonCapabilityModel.md, with its
machine-readable baseline at infospace/models/capability/capabilities.yaml:
41 capabilities across 8 navigation domains, the D0–D7 provision maturity scale,
the C/S/N/I/P resource classes, capability relationship types, and admission
rules.
New canonical concepts: Capability, CapabilityDomain, CapabilityProfile,
CapabilityContract, CapabilityRequirement, CapabilityProvider,
CapabilityProvision, CapabilityMaturityLevel, CapabilityQualityDimension,
CapabilityEvidenceHook, CapabilityResourceClass, CapabilityInclusionRule.
Rationale. The canon modelled landscape, data, security, delivery, network, observability, governance, organization, task, and access — but never what an information system must be able to do. The Landscape Model deferred this ground explicitly (§11.4). Consumers were already working around the gap.
Source and disposition. Adapted from the Information Technology Capability
Canon (ITCC) v0.1 under assimilation assimilation/it-capability-canon,
disposition adapt. Changes made on adoption:
Profilerenamed toCapabilityProfile— the name collided with the canonProfileartifact type (Core §8.6);CapabilityProvisionmade explicit, so maturity has a defined bearer;- per-capability
anchorsadded, naming the canon model(s) owning the concepts each capability exercises (guards Core §6.2 and §6.3); CapabilityRequirementbound to the Purpose and Demand extension as a typedDemandSignalrather than a parallel vocabulary;- the source's proposed CILM landscape model rejected — the Landscape Model already owns that ground;
- capability definitions held only in YAML; the Markdown does not restate them.
Breaking: no. No existing canonical concept was removed, renamed, or moved.
Artifact status. The model enters at proposed. Promotion requires
resolution of open question OQ-2 (the governance.* id prefix), a published
contract schema, formal mapping artifacts, and one profile expressing a real
requirement set with evidence — tracked in ITC-WP-0014.
Known weakness. Seven capabilities (commerce.* except entitlement, and
four intelligence.*) are unanchored — new canon surface with no owning model
(OQ-5). Accepted at proposed status.
Added — Intake and Assimilation Practice
infospace/assimilation/intake-and-assimilation-practice.md defines the
repository-wide procedure for absorbing new concepts and terminology: the
incoming/ drop zone, frozen source snapshots, the Minimal Assimilation Profile,
the disposition gate, canon transformation and registration, and the resulting
canon version with change notes. incoming/README.md documents the drop zone.
Rationale. Inputs previously had no defined path from arrival to canon, risking the copy-paste assimilation Core §29.6 warns against.
Changed
canon.yaml— version0.1.0-scaffold→0.2.0;itc-capregistered undermodels:with assimilation provenance.infospace/artifacts/index.yaml— registeredmodel/capability,capability-catalog/itc-cap,assimilation/it-capability-canon,practice/intake-and-assimilation(65 artifacts, up from 61).infospace/infospace.yaml— Capability Model added to disciplines.- Regenerated agent briefs, retrieval indexes, and views.
tests/— artifact and model counts updated to match the registered canon.workplans/index.yaml— registeredITC-WP-0014, andITC-WP-0013which was missing from the registry.
Validation
make validate passes with 0 errors and 0 warnings (65 artifacts, 286
relationships, 0 consistency cycles, coverage 1.0, redundancy 0.0).
make test passes (22 tests).
0.1.0-scaffold
Seed kernel: kernel documents, eleven domain models, three standards, the
infospace scaffold, service surface (CLI / JSON / API), generated views and
agent briefs. See workplans/ ITC-WP-0001 through ITC-WP-0012 for the history.