Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a070b5-4994-7271-bd8b-7c3dbcedec4b
4.4 KiB
4.4 KiB
FOAF Agent Person Group OnlineAccount
Source Type
Semantic vocabulary. FOAF (Friend of a Friend) RDF vocabulary for persons, agents, groups, and online accounts.
Domain
Semantic web social identity, person/agent distinction, and account representation.
Why This Source Matters
FOAF distinguishes persons, agents, organizations, groups, accounts, and membership-like properties — an early explicit separation of actor, account, and online presence.
Key Concepts
- foaf:Person: a person (human); may have name, homepage, depiction.
- foaf:Agent: anything that can do things; superclass of Person, Organization, Group.
- foaf:Organization: collective agent with members and name.
- foaf:Group: collective agent with
memberproperty linking to agents. - foaf:OnlineAccount: account on a service; links via
accountServiceHomepageandaccountName. - foaf:OnlineChatAccount / OnlineGamingAccount: specialized account types.
- foaf:member: agent belongs to group (inverse of Group membership).
- foaf:knows: social acquaintance link between agents (not authorization).
- foaf:mbox / mbox_sha1sum: email or hashed email identifiers.
- foaf:openid: OpenID identifier for agent.
- foaf:Document / Image: non-agent resources.
Relevant Terminology
| Term | Source meaning |
|---|---|
| Person | Human being in FOAF sense. |
| Agent | Anything capable of action; includes persons and collectives. |
| Organization | Named collective agent. |
| Group | Collective agent with explicit members. |
| OnlineAccount | Presence on a service with account name. |
| member | Membership link from group to agent. |
| knows | Social network acquaintance between agents. |
| accountName | Handle on a service. |
| accountServiceHomepage | Service URL defining account namespace. |
| mbox | Email identifier (often mailto: URI). |
Modeling Assumptions
- Agent is the root actionable type; Person is a specialization.
- Person is explicitly human, separate from accounts.
- OnlineAccount is not the person; it is an account on a service linked to an agent.
- Groups and Organizations are agents with member properties.
- Social knows is weak affiliation, not trust or authorization.
- Identifiers (mbox, openid) are properties, not first-class scoped objects.
- RDF graph allows multiple incomplete assertions about same agents.
Identity-Canon Implications
- FOAF Person maps closely to Natural Person.
- FOAF Agent maps to Actor.
- FOAF Organization / Group map to Organization / Group collective actors.
- FOAF OnlineAccount maps to Account with service Scope defined
by
accountServiceHomepage. - accountName maps to Identifier.
- member maps to Membership Relationship.
- knows maps to Affiliation Relationship (social, weak).
- FOAF is strong evidence for P1 (actor root) and P2 (person ≠ account).
- Supports S01, S08, S09 with explicit person/account split.
Terminology Conflicts
- Agent vs. Artificial Agent: FOAF Agent includes humans; canon Artificial Agent is non-human only.
- Group vs. Community: FOAF Group is generic collective; community implies participation norms.
- OnlineAccount vs. Profile: FOAF account is service presence; profile is broader presentation surface.
- knows vs. Following: knows is bidirectional acquaintance; ActivityPub Follow is directed.
- mbox vs. Identifier: mbox is contact + identifier; conflation risk.
Candidate Canonical Mappings
| FOAF concept | Candidate canonical concept |
|---|---|
| Person | Natural Person |
| Agent | Actor |
| Organization | Organization |
| Group | Group |
| OnlineAccount | Account |
| accountName | Identifier |
| accountServiceHomepage | Scope (service namespace) |
| member | Membership Relationship |
| knows | Affiliation Relationship |
| mbox / openid | Identifier |
| depiction / name | Profile attributes |
Open Questions
- Should FOAF OnlineAccount always imply Account, or sometimes Profile only?
- How should
mbox_sha1summap for privacy-preserving synonymity (weak match)? - Does FOAF Group map to Group only, or also Community when informal?
- Should knows remain Affiliation, or split into Following vs. acquaintance?
References
- FOAF vocabulary specification — http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/
- FOAF 0.99 RDF schema — http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/