coulomb/info-tech-canon
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
info-tech-canon/infospace/assimilation/emission-cadence/open-questions.md
tegwick b081d39da1
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
Details
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 3s
Details
Implement canon conformance and maintenance optimizations 
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a06e82-3e08-7042-a79d-438ac6eed8db
2026-09-05 00:50:09 +02:00

660 B
Raw Blame History

Open questions — EmissionCadenceDeclaration

No question blocks adoption.

The following promotion questions remain for the draft's future review:

  1. Do two independent source implementations need interval tolerance or grace fields in the generic core, or can profiles carry them in extensions?
  2. Should schema 1.0 retain the handed-over name sources for cadence entries, or migrate to the clearer cadences with explicit compatibility tooling?
  3. Does reconciliation eventually need a generic typed counter-selector language, or are owner-defined field references sufficient?

These are review triggers, not deferred implementation tasks.