info-tech-canon/intakes/intakes.md
tegwick a2b254786e
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 1s
Introduce shared evidence model and governance imports
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a070b5-4994-7271-bd8b-7c3dbcedec4b
2026-09-05 21:16:29 +02:00

2.2 KiB

Intake records

ITC-IN-0001 — Declaration requested: state this repository's layer in INTENT.md (security layer model §11)

id: ITC-IN-0001
kind: intake
title: 'Declaration requested: state this repository''s layer in INTENT.md (security
  layer model §11)'
status: closed
origin: cross-repo
origin_ref: net-kingdom security-layer-model_v0.4 §11
priority: low
owner: info-tech-canon
requested_by: gate-house
proposed_layer: Taxonomy
description: 'A conformance sweep on 2026-08-28 found this repository has no layer
  declaration of its own. It carries a layering review note gate-house wrote into
  the top of its INTENT.md on 2026-08-24, and that note names a layer — but the words
  are gate-house''s, sitting above a line admitting the body is unadapted. Section
  11 has since been amended to say so explicitly: a layer stated about a repository
  by another repository is not a declaration; only the repository''s own file, in
  its own voice, conforms. Seven of fifteen estate-authored repositories have declared;
  this is one of the eight that have not, and the standard does not claim adoption
  on the basis of notes gate-house wrote. REQUESTED: state the layer in INTENT.md
  in your own voice, or contest it. PROPOSED LAYER: Taxonomy. Cross-cutting semantic
  contracts for the whole ecosystem; NetKingdom-specific security architecture is
  net-kingdom canon''s. The boundary between the two canons is worth stating in your
  own words. Contesting is a real option and costs nothing — the three repositories
  that reviewed this model each returned a correction, two of which changed the standard.
  If the proposed layer is wrong for what this repository actually does, that is more
  useful to us than a label added to close a checkbox. Standard: net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.4.md.'
created: '2026-08-28T21:01:51.123381Z'
updated: '2026-09-04T03:10:00+02:00'
disposition: accepted
resolution: >-
  INTENT.md now declares info-tech-canon as Taxonomy in this repository's own
  voice and states the ownership boundary with NetKingdom-specific security
  architecture and importing profiles.
resolved_by: codex
resolved_at: '2026-09-04T03:10:00+02:00'
state_hub_intake_id: "01a072ff-659a-7b07-b693-e82f509d3057"