No change in the evidence: feedback/ holds only the two 2026-08-15
resource-control reports, incoming/ only its README, and no inbox message is an
emission-cadence declaration. The sole declaration in the repository is still
the worked example, which the standard states is not source-owned.
What this repository owes the gate was re-tested rather than assumed.
emission-review validates an arbitrary source-owned declaration and reports
operational_truth_assessed false, so a submission cannot be read as observed
behaviour, and export-emission-contract produces a bundle whose manifest carries
the gate in words at digest 972c0b6701d1693f, which a source owner can pin to
today.
The blocker is not readiness but that no external source owner has been asked.
The contract came from the King's Guard taxonomy with evidence classes owned by
NetKingdom, which makes netkingdom the obvious first source owner and a second
one that must be independent of it. Soliciting them is an outward action this
workplan does not authorize, so T06 stays waiting on that decision.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
tegwick
9de170ecf9