info-tech-canon/workplans/ITC-WP-0014-capability-model-consolidation.md

---
id: ITC-WP-0014
type: workplan
title: "Capability Model consolidation (post-ITCC assimilation)"
domain: infotech
topic_slug: canon
repo: info-tech-canon
status: finished
priority: medium
created: "2026-08-14"
updated: "2026-08-15"
depends_on_workplans:
  - ITC-WP-0003
  - ITC-WP-0006
owner: claude
spec_refs:
  - infospace/assimilation/it-capability-canon/ASSIMILATION.md
  - infospace/assimilation/it-capability-canon/proposed-changes.md
  - infospace/assimilation/it-capability-canon/open-questions.md
  - infospace/models/capability/InfoTechCanonCapabilityModel.md
  - demand/CapabilityProvisionEconomics.md
state_hub_workstream_id: "f2811adc-7244-5d07-b1e9-39b0717097af"
---

# ITC-WP-0014 — Capability Model Consolidation

## Goal

Promote `InfoTechCanonCapabilityModel` from `proposed` to a usable canon model by
closing the items the ITCC v0.1 assimilation deliberately deferred.

## Intent

Canon version 0.2.0 adopted the capability vocabulary under disposition `adapt`.
The model is registered, validated, and anchored, but it has no schema, no formal
mapping artifacts, and no profile exercising it. OQ-2 is resolved (canon 0.2.1).
Consumer demand `CapabilityProvisionEconomics` (resource-control) refined the
still-proposed model in canon 0.3.0 / ITC-CAP 0.2.0: requirement targets,
provision-side consumption, and the H/I/P class set. T02 must encode that
refined contract, not the v0.1.0 one.

## Tasks

### T01 — Resolve the `governance.*` identifier prefix (OQ-2)

```task
id: ITC-WP-0014-T01
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "2c17cd2e-3526-51ea-bf2f-39e387b5ca9a"
```

Decide between keeping the ids, renumbering to `security.*`, or splitting the
navigation domain into `security` and `governance` (preferred — preserves every
id). Record as a DecisionRecord. **Blocks promotion beyond `proposed`.**

**Done 2026-08-15 (canon 0.2.1):** navigation domain split into `security` (4)
and `governance` (2); no capability id changed. Decision record in
`assimilation/it-capability-canon/ASSIMILATION.md`; OQ-2 closed.

### T02 — Publish `capability.schema.yaml`

```task
id: ITC-WP-0014-T02
status: done
priority: high
depends_on: [T01]
state_hub_task_id: "9471f300-a0a9-5159-a99d-4a2dafc9e5b7"
```

Add the capability contract schema under `infospace/schemas/`, register it in
`infospace/infospace.yaml`, and validate `capabilities.yaml` against it.
Encode ITC-CAP 0.4.0: no `typical_resource_classes` on contracts; resource
classes carry `native_unit`, `supply`, and `capacity_behaviour`; consumption
rows require EvidenceBasis (CAP-R10); provisions may declare
`uses_provisions` (CAP-R11); requirement and provision record shapes live
in the model prose until a companion requirement/provision schema is
justified. §10.3 is already met by the resource-control join.

**Done 2026-08-15 (canon 0.6.0):** `capability.schema.yaml` validates the
catalog; `capability-record.schema.yaml` is the companion record shape.
`make validate` checks the catalog contract (no typical_resource_classes;
classes carry native_unit / supply / capacity_behaviour).

### T03 — Formal mapping artifacts for each anchor

```task
id: ITC-WP-0014-T03
status: done
priority: medium
depends_on: [T02]
state_hub_task_id: "5ef471bc-4741-5b21-b9fe-5f0616a0b7f5"
```

Turn `assimilation/it-capability-canon/mappings.yaml` into per-pair mapping
artifacts under `infospace/mappings/` conforming to `mapping.schema.yaml`.

**Done 2026-08-15:** `infospace/mappings/capability-anchors.yaml` holds one
entry per source/target pair, registered as `mapping/capability-anchors`.

### T04 — Small-SaaS capability requirement set

```task
id: ITC-WP-0014-T04
status: todo
priority: medium
depends_on: [T02]
state_hub_task_id: "a4621991-fea8-5f74-b0fd-e5e606ea32a7"
```

Express a real `CapabilityRequirement` set with provisions and evidence in the
small-saas profile (coordinate with ITC-WP-0004). Useful in-repo illustration.
**No longer the promotion gate** — §10.3 now accepts a consumer record that
validates against the live catalog (T11).

### T05 — Landscape and kernel-map revision

```task
id: ITC-WP-0014-T05
status: done
priority: medium
depends_on: [T01]
state_hub_task_id: "15f92689-6679-5861-992b-a923df12570a"
```

Revise `InfoTechCanonLandscapeModel` §11.4 (the deferred strategy/capability note)
to reference ITC-CAP, and add the capability model to
`InfoTechCanonKernelMap`.

**Done 2026-08-15:** §11.4 now points at ITC-CAP; Kernel Map §4.14 owns
abilities.

### T06 — Requirement/provision validation in the service surface

```task
id: ITC-WP-0014-T06
status: done
priority: low
depends_on: [T02]
state_hub_task_id: "917d899b-ba0b-5dad-863d-4f3598315c09"
```

Extend the CLI/JSON/API surface (ITC-WP-0002) to answer "does this environment
satisfy this product's capability requirements?" — the validator sketched in
source §18. Covers OQ-6.

**Done 2026-08-15:** `info-tech-canon capability-review PATH` and
`GET /capability-review?path=` join a consumer record to the live catalog
(CAP-R8–R11).

### T07 — Promotion review

```task
id: ITC-WP-0014-T07
status: done
priority: medium
depends_on: [T01, T02, T03, T11]
state_hub_task_id: "47c80168-47f4-5c62-978d-1a4865805240"
```

Promote the model from `proposed` to `draft` or `release-candidate`, bump the
canon version, and write the `CHANGELOG.md` entry. T04 (small-saas illustration)
is no longer a promotion dependency.

**Done 2026-08-15:** ITC-CAP promoted to `draft` in canon 0.6.0. This is
the freeze version. T04 remains an optional illustration.

### T08 — Finding A: move resource-class declaration off the contract

```task
id: ITC-WP-0014-T08
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "e5781819-0762-5235-9d15-e8bff7076a94"
```

Remove `typical_resource_classes` from every capability contract so §4.11 and
the catalog agree. Consumption is declared on `CapabilityProvision` only.

**Done 2026-08-15 (canon 0.3.0 / ITC-CAP 0.2.0).**

### T09 — Finding B: demand-side targets and constraints

```task
id: ITC-WP-0014-T09
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "4ae015ae-9a90-5efd-8521-673cbe595569"
```

Enrich `CapabilityRequirement` with profile, quality targets against declared
dimensions, and placement constraints. Keep measurement on ITC-LAND / ITC-OBS.

**Done 2026-08-15 (canon 0.3.0 / ITC-CAP 0.2.0).**

### T10 — Finding C: human effort, native units, intelligence as substitute

```task
id: ITC-WP-0014-T10
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "87dccc73-a8dd-5a5a-a3fa-0bc488098b45"
```

Add class `H`, narrow `P`, recharacterise `I`, declare native units and
supply/capacity defaults, record consumption in native units, add
`intelligence_intensity`. No `substitutes_for`, no exchange rate.

**Done 2026-08-15 (canon 0.3.0 / ITC-CAP 0.2.0).** Landed here rather than as a
new workplan: no LAND or commerce owning-model change was required.

### T11 — Joinable consumer proof for §10.3

```task
id: ITC-WP-0014-T11
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "5cb4d4ab-9463-5bd5-b7be-ecf7da941d39"
```

Revise §10.3 so a consumer record that validates against the live catalog
and is cited from `feedback/` counts as the promotion proof. Record
resource-control `data/capability/platform-audit-storage.json` (commit
`13c2b82`) as that proof.

**Done 2026-08-15 (canon 0.4.0 / ITC-CAP 0.3.0).** Operational facts stay
in the consumer repo.

## Out of scope

- New domain models for `commerce.*` / `intelligence.*` (OQ-5) — the 2026-08-15
  demand needed consumption structure, which landed in ITC-CAP; invoices,
  entitlements, prompts, and evaluations still have no owning model.
- Canon-wide intended/declared/applied/observed/assessed state qualifiers (OQ-3)
  — kernel-level pressure, not a capability-model decision.
- CARING importing `identity.*` ids — touches a release-candidate standard and
  needs its own review.
- Booked cost, currency handling, labour rates, or an H↔I exchange rate.