tegwick
e0ca7de63b
INFO-WP-0030: register practice-pattern/explicit-unsafe-diagnostic-mode (adapted from coordination-engine's OrwellLoggingDiagnostics candidate, INFO-DEC-2026-003) at canon 0.13.0, close the assimilation, and notify coordination-engine for COORDINATION-WP-0004-T02. Workplan finished. INFO-WP-0029: record activity-core's source-owned declaration (T03/T04 done) with its expected-rate/calendar-schedule incompatibility as demand/EmissionExpectedRateCalendar.md, and record audit-core's structural-only observer evaluation of net-kingdom's declaration as a steward note. No party has yet produced a real observer result against traffic, so T05 and the workplan stay blocked on external action. Updated artifact-count and practice-pattern-count assertions in tests/test_cli.py and tests/test_service.py for the new artifact. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: sonnet Assistant-Process: 317218@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: a8d6c0ab-c70f-4610-a288-576f44d747d4
190 lines
8.1 KiB
Markdown
190 lines
8.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: INFO-WP-0029
|
|
type: workplan
|
|
title: "Seek independent Emission Cadence adoption evidence"
|
|
domain: infotech
|
|
repo: info-tech-canon
|
|
status: blocked
|
|
owner: claude
|
|
topic_slug: canon-optimization
|
|
created: "2026-09-21"
|
|
updated: "2026-09-27"
|
|
flavor: coordination
|
|
state_hub_workstream_id: "d743e220-9d2d-52d8-8df3-880805269639"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Emission Cadence adoption
|
|
|
|
INFO-DEC-2026-002 split the promotion gate and moved the standard to candidate,
|
|
which asserts a specified contract and no adoption. This workplan pursues the
|
|
other half: the evidence the stable level requires. Authorized by the founder
|
|
(`GOVERN @ estate`) on 2026-09-21, which lifts the restriction INFO-WP-0019-T06 carried against
|
|
outward messages.
|
|
|
|
Success is not "two declarations arrive". Success is learning whether the
|
|
contract survives someone implementing it. A recorded incompatibility closes
|
|
this workplan as usefully as a clean adoption does.
|
|
|
|
## Publish what a source owner needs
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: INFO-WP-0029-T01
|
|
status: done
|
|
priority: high
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "c5d6422b-53a2-597a-a554-52741d4ae146"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
`docs/emission-cadence-adoption.md` states what a source owner supplies — a
|
|
declaration they own, valid against the schema, pinned to the contract digest —
|
|
and what it does not ask for: no deployment, no runtime proof, no conformance
|
|
claim. It names the validate command, both declared forms, the separate observer
|
|
role, and says plainly that the contract has never been implemented and that
|
|
reporting where it does not fit is a successful outcome.
|
|
|
|
The ask points at this page rather than restating itself in every message, so
|
|
what is being asked cannot drift between recipients.
|
|
|
|
## Ask net-kingdom, the origin owner
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: INFO-WP-0029-T02
|
|
status: done
|
|
priority: high
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "845c27d1-5b66-5317-8abb-0a62eb0d9638"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The contract was assimilated from the King's Guard taxonomy and the evidence
|
|
classes remain NetKingdom-owned, so net-kingdom is the one party with a
|
|
pre-existing stake in being able to read silence. It is also the party most
|
|
likely to find the contract's real gaps, since it wrote the problem statement.
|
|
|
|
Ask for one source-owned declaration for an event class it already emits.
|
|
Waiting for a reply is expected; this task tracks the ask, not the answer.
|
|
|
|
Sent 2026-09-21 as State Hub message `3432a831-b25f-4717-ad8b-cb19fb1b6633`.
|
|
Answered the same day (`3b2db043`): a declaration was published at net-kingdom
|
|
`116643f`, `local-identity/emission-cadence.yaml`, together with an
|
|
incompatibility finding. It is recorded under T04.
|
|
|
|
## Ask a second, independent source
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: INFO-WP-0029-T03
|
|
status: done
|
|
priority: high
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "bb74cce9-12d8-58e2-ad44-c4aeb7b72f37"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The second declaration must come from an owner independent of net-kingdom.
|
|
`activity-core` is the candidate: it has a real, documented periodic emission
|
|
relationship into issue-core, so declared cadence is a question it already has
|
|
rather than one this request invents.
|
|
|
|
Sent 2026-09-21 as State Hub message `f1687805-3153-47c2-9744-05a2b1a6b8c1`.
|
|
Both messages name the brief rather than restating the ask, and both say that a
|
|
recorded incompatibility is a successful outcome.
|
|
|
|
Answered 2026-09-22 (`161d5aa5`): a declaration was published at activity-core
|
|
`f20db47`, `docs/emission-cadence/activity-core-evidence.yaml`, together with
|
|
an incompatibility finding. It is recorded under T04.
|
|
|
|
## Recheck — 2026-09-21
|
|
|
|
No reply, and none should be expected yet. Both requests are unread. Neither
|
|
recipient has read its inbox since before the requests were sent: net-kingdom
|
|
last read on 2026-09-07 and has ten unread messages back to 2026-09-09;
|
|
activity-core last read on 2026-09-04 with five unread back to that day. These
|
|
agents read their inboxes only when a session runs in their repository, so the
|
|
requests will be seen when that next happens, not before.
|
|
|
|
Drafting the declarations from this repository was considered and rejected. A
|
|
declaration written by the same agent that wrote the contract proves nothing the
|
|
stable gate asks: the gate exists to test whether parties who did not write the
|
|
contract can implement it. Producing the evidence here would satisfy the letter
|
|
of section 10 and defeat its purpose.
|
|
|
|
## Record the evidence or the incompatibility
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: INFO-WP-0029-T04
|
|
status: done
|
|
priority: medium
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "4771ff59-264e-5917-a49d-8989b361b8ed"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Validate whatever arrives with `emission-review`, record it as adoption
|
|
evidence under `feedback/`, and write up what the attempt revealed. If a
|
|
declaration cannot be expressed in either form, that is the finding, and it goes
|
|
to the standard as a change proposal rather than being worked around in the
|
|
declaration.
|
|
|
|
### Recorded so far — 2026-09-22
|
|
|
|
net-kingdom's declaration passes `emission-review` (`ok: true`). It is recorded
|
|
as `feedback/2026-09-21-net-kingdom-emission-cadence-declaration.md`. Its
|
|
incompatibility is that a session-scoped source cannot make its silence
|
|
meaningful in either form. That finding goes to the standard as
|
|
`demand/EmissionActivityScope.md` and was not worked around in the
|
|
declaration.
|
|
|
|
Checking the pin exposed a canon-side defect. The brief quoted digest
|
|
`972c0b6701d1693f`, which is the 0.1.0 draft bundle, because the candidate
|
|
promotion changed the standard's text after the digest was taken. The export
|
|
manifest also hard-coded `status: draft`. The manifest now reads status and
|
|
version from the standard. A test pins that behaviour, and the brief names the
|
|
candidate digest `b08b4d95fc4b0bd3`. The wire schema did not change, so the
|
|
declaration stays valid.
|
|
|
|
### Recorded — 2026-09-27
|
|
|
|
activity-core's declaration passes `emission-review` (`ok: true`, `errors: []`).
|
|
It is recorded as
|
|
`feedback/2026-09-22-activity-core-emission-cadence-declaration.md`. Its
|
|
incompatibility is that `expected-rate`'s wall-clock window cannot express a
|
|
weekday-only (calendar-shaped) schedule; the consumer used `reconciliation`
|
|
instead for that entry. That finding goes to the standard as
|
|
`demand/EmissionExpectedRateCalendar.md` and was not worked around in the
|
|
declaration.
|
|
|
|
audit-core also replied (unread until this session) with a structural-only
|
|
observer evaluation of net-kingdom's declaration, explicitly stating it does
|
|
not satisfy the stable gate because audit-core holds no `local-identity`
|
|
traffic to evaluate against. Recorded as a steward note on
|
|
`feedback/2026-09-21-net-kingdom-emission-cadence-declaration.md`. It found a
|
|
second incompatibility (heartbeat `event_class` vs. `heartbeat_classes`
|
|
drift), noted there rather than duplicated here.
|
|
|
|
Both declarations now arrived and are recorded. This task is done. T05
|
|
(observer result) stays open: no observer has evaluated a source with
|
|
registered traffic against either declaration.
|
|
|
|
## Observer result
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: INFO-WP-0029-T05
|
|
status: wait
|
|
priority: medium
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "0486fcba-3609-50c5-b347-e7ee84f9f548"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
One result from a party other than the declaring source, evaluating a declared
|
|
cadence against observed events. Two declarations now exist (net-kingdom,
|
|
activity-core), so the earlier blocker is cleared, but no result exists yet:
|
|
audit-core's 2026-09-22 reply evaluated net-kingdom's declaration structurally
|
|
only and said plainly that this does not satisfy the gate, since audit-core
|
|
holds no traffic from that source. A real result needs a source with an
|
|
`expected-rate` or `reconciliation` declaration registered at an observer and
|
|
sending it traffic — neither net-kingdom nor activity-core currently sends
|
|
traffic that any known observer holds (activity-core's periodic emission into
|
|
issue-core is off in production). This is now blocked on an external party
|
|
(a source and an observer both taking action this repository does not
|
|
control), so the workplan status moves to `blocked` pending that.
|
|
|
|
## Honest limit on what this can prove
|
|
|
|
Both candidate owners are repositories in the same founder's fleet. They are
|
|
independent of each other and of this repository in the sense the standard's
|
|
section 10 requires, and that is the sense the gate was written in — but they
|
|
are not independent of the founder. Evidence gathered here demonstrates that
|
|
the contract is implementable by parties who did not write it. It does not
|
|
demonstrate ecosystem adoption, and no promotion note may claim otherwise.
|