tegwick
3fb1f5b443
The compendium keeps the digest. The exploration notes live in nudges/ and are not work records. Assistant: grok Assistant-Session: 01a106a5-fc07-78c2-b64f-8e04cea25daf
9 lines
849 B
Markdown
9 lines
849 B
Markdown
# Label the evidence layer on a recommendation
|
|
|
|
Nudge. Noted 2026-10-04.
|
|
|
|
Derived from [compendium/04-socher-eureka-machine.md](../compendium/04-socher-eureka-machine.md) §5, "Label the evidence layer on a recommendation."
|
|
|
|
Pant's account of chapter 8 describes four parts: records, a model of physical regularities, a simulation, and a measurement that can disagree with the model that proposed the action. For a scientific task, a recommendation could say which of those parts its evidence occupies.
|
|
|
|
Literature-only evidence supports a knowledge-layer report. It does not support a Sufficient or Budget winner. The v0.2 source-backed example already withholds those winners. The idea is to make the missing layer visible in the report. INTENT principle P9 is the policy this would illustrate. It is not a change to `policies/advisor-v0.2.json`.
|