tegwick
3f225d28c1
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a087be-d842-7252-81be-2105c4279c87
129 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
129 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: INTERFACE-WP-0004
|
|
type: workplan
|
|
title: "Establish external federation acceptance and consumer adoption"
|
|
domain: infotech
|
|
repo: interface-canon
|
|
status: finished
|
|
owner: codex
|
|
topic_slug: canon
|
|
origin: residual
|
|
origin_ref: INTERFACE-WP-0003
|
|
created: "2026-09-09"
|
|
updated: "2026-09-09"
|
|
state_hub_workstream_id: "cb0b8342-4b9a-5d73-876d-dc857f8aee8d"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Establish external federation acceptance and consumer adoption
|
|
|
|
The local mapping review and source-based consumer proof are complete. Stable
|
|
promotion requires externally evidenced acceptance and adoption. This active
|
|
plan records the remaining work without claiming control over peer backlogs.
|
|
|
|
## Obtain upstream boundary acceptance
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: INTERFACE-WP-0004-T01
|
|
status: done
|
|
priority: medium
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "5111826f-b039-5fb3-a194-b5e00595c5b2"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Prepare peer-review material from the mapping and federation reviews. Record
|
|
acceptance or requested corrections from the relevant owners and determine whether
|
|
reciprocal cards or ownership-ledger entries are appropriate. Dependencies:
|
|
peer review and authorization for any external coordination or peer changes.
|
|
Done when accepted boundaries and their source records are recorded.
|
|
|
|
## Record consumer-owned adoption and assess promotion
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: INTERFACE-WP-0004-T02
|
|
status: done
|
|
priority: medium
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "b9c8cedd-9aa0-5243-b3b5-880a3f0da9c9"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Use the Repo Manager example as review material; obtain a consumer-owned reference
|
|
or another concrete adoption record. Reassess model/card status against both tasks'
|
|
evidence and document the outcome. A local worked example alone is insufficient.
|
|
Validation: source pins, federation schema, and named acceptance/adoption evidence.
|
|
|
|
## Prepared review package — 2026-09-09
|
|
|
|
[Review package](../reviews/INTERFACE-WP-0004/README.md) contains three
|
|
owner-specific patches and exact request texts. Each patch passed
|
|
`git apply --check` against its target checkout. The completed migration project's
|
|
GOAL.md and README are pinned as evidence that its ledger is not a universal
|
|
registration gate for future canon extensions.
|
|
|
|
T01 and T02 remain waiting for actual owner responses. The user explicitly
|
|
authorized messaging, and all three review requests were sent on 2026-09-09.
|
|
Message IDs, timestamps, recipients, and exact sent bodies are retained in the
|
|
[delivery receipts](../reviews/INTERFACE-WP-0004/README.md#delivery-receipts).
|
|
Next action: review replies, apply accepted corrections, and record owner evidence.
|
|
Model/card publication remains draft 0.1.1. No peer checkout was changed.
|
|
|
|
## Open-task check — 2026-09-09
|
|
|
|
The repository files and Statehub projection both contain two open tasks, T01 and
|
|
T02, waiting for owner responses. [Thread check](../reviews/INTERFACE-WP-0004/latest-thread-check.json)
|
|
found zero replies in all three request threads. InfoTechCanon and Repo Manager
|
|
requests were marked read; the FIAM request was unread at the recorded check.
|
|
Read status is not acceptance. There are no requested corrections to implement.
|
|
|
|
The offline brief was stale and has been regenerated from the current hub
|
|
projection. T01 needs the InfoTechCanon and FIAM boundary responses; T02 needs
|
|
Repo Manager adoption evidence before publication can be reassessed. Keep both
|
|
open and preserve draft status until those records arrive.
|
|
|
|
## Implementation from owner review — 2026-09-09
|
|
|
|
[Acceptance report](../infospace/reviews/acceptance/README.md) pins the committed
|
|
FIAM owner record and documents the remaining evidence limits. FIAM accepted the
|
|
0.1.1 derivation without blocking corrections. InfoTechCanon's visible but
|
|
uncommitted review prompted clarifications now implemented in draft 0.1.2:
|
|
physical/device versus transport Port, explicit evidence interest and source
|
|
capture, and the limits of Artifact/KnowledgeArtifact alignment.
|
|
|
|
T01 remains `wait` for InfoTechCanon's committed record; FIAM's part is satisfied.
|
|
T02 remains `wait` for consumer-owned adoption evidence. Neither task is closed
|
|
solely because request messages have been read. The source model and card stay
|
|
draft; prior review targets remain explicitly 0.1.1.
|
|
|
|
Validation: make check-sources, local YAML parsing, pinned interface-card schema,
|
|
and model/manifest/card version agreement. No runtime code changed.
|
|
|
|
## Consumer adoption implemented — 2026-09-09
|
|
|
|
T02 is done. Repo Manager's committed acceptance at
|
|
`84df076e95ccafaccb1d8f9ef0878da4cf9278a7` is pinned in the
|
|
[acceptance report](../infospace/reviews/acceptance/README.md). The example now
|
|
states the client/provider validation boundary and the limits of idempotency-header
|
|
evidence. The federation card records scoped adoption at reviewed version 0.1.1.
|
|
|
|
Publication was assessed and remains draft 0.1.2: documented adoption does not
|
|
itself imply stable approval. T01 still waits for InfoTechCanon's committed record;
|
|
its checkout contains review text but no containing commit at this check. FIAM's
|
|
committed acceptance already satisfies its portion. No new residual task is needed.
|
|
|
|
Validation: source-integrity checks, local YAML and pinned card-schema validation,
|
|
plus workplan/index status consistency. No runtime implementation changed.
|
|
|
|
## Final completion — 2026-09-09
|
|
|
|
T01 is done: InfoTechCanon's acceptance is committed at
|
|
`f921e5a543db8da49781bd560d303f780623d204` and pinned with SHA-256 in the
|
|
[acceptance report](../infospace/reviews/acceptance/README.md). Its clarifications
|
|
were already implemented in 0.1.2. FIAM acceptance and Repo Manager adoption are
|
|
also pinned; T02's publication assessment remains “draft 0.1.2.” All owner review
|
|
pins retain their requested 0.1.1 target and agent-review scope.
|
|
|
|
Both tasks and this workplan are complete. No implementation residuals remain.
|
|
Future stable promotion or source changes are separate demand-driven work; no
|
|
new workplan is created merely because the publication outcome is draft. Earlier
|
|
waiting-state notes above are chronological evidence superseded by this section.
|
|
|
|
Validation: all source pins, document links, YAML parsing, pinned card schema,
|
|
acceptance-manifest paths, and workplan/index completion agree. Shared imports
|
|
and the original FIAM standard pins were preserved.
|