All checks were successful
Build and Publish Container Image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 45s
KEY-WP-0013-T02 and KEY-WP-0014-T04 stay blocked on custody and on ops-warden, but each contains a KeyCape-owned piece that had been left as prose. T02 requires proving "live JWKS verification and denied excess scopes without logging values"; T04 step 4 requires verifying a rotated secret, refusing its predecessor and refusing excess scope. Both were describable and neither was runnable, so the proof would have been improvised by hand against production at the moment custody lands -- the worst possible time for it. keycape verify-client does it in one command. Per registration it checks discovery origin, the client_credentials exchange and its RS256 signature against the deployed JWKS, exact sub/tenant/roles/principal_type, that every -deny-scope is refused, and that the token carries no scope that was not requested. That last check is a real gap: the caller commands prove every requested scope was granted, never that nothing extra came back. -previous-secret-env additionally requires the predecessor to be refused, and treats an unchanged secret as a rotation that did not happen. Nothing is written to disk and no value is printed. Failures name the claim, not the observed value, so running this against production cannot turn a verification into a disclosure. Every check runs before it reports, so one failure does not hide the rest. The exact invocation for each approval client is recorded in the verification block of the provisioning packet, so custody admission hands back a command rather than a description. Tests cover the passing case, an over-broad registration, a live predecessor, an identical rotation and output non-disclosure; neutering mustFail makes the suite fail, so the checks have teeth. Also recorded in KEY-WP-0014: read from ops-warden's catalog rather than waiting for a reply, key-cape-oidc-login is asked-and-waiting on us since 2026-08-28 and is a pointer lane with no programmatic consumers, and the rapp-qonto-keycape-client blocker citing an absent native exchange command went stale when service-token shipped on 2026-09-05. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016uV8zoCKpA1WRAxsKRYbdH Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1182213@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 966597b9-ae61-46a4-8b9e-1594ab3ec4ad
134 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
134 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
# Native caller authentication
|
|
|
|
KeyCape owns the `keycape service-token` and `keycape login` commands. They
|
|
produce issuer-verified JWTs in a new mode-0600 JSON file outside Git worktrees.
|
|
Existing files and symlinks are refused. Token responses and provider error
|
|
bodies are never printed. Commands exit nonzero on verification or delivery
|
|
failure and remove incomplete output files.
|
|
|
|
## Service exchange
|
|
|
|
Have the existing custody mechanism inject the registered client secret into a
|
|
named environment variable, then run:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
keycape service-token --issuer https://kc.coulomb.social \
|
|
--client-id rapp-qonto --scope qonto:read \
|
|
--secret-env KEYCAPE_RAPP_QONTO_CLIENT_SECRET \
|
|
--out /private/runtime/qonto-token.json
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The output directory must already exist. No secret belongs on argv. The command
|
|
uses client_secret_basic with OAuth form encoding. The server must include the
|
|
matching decoding fix for secrets containing reserved characters. The Qonto
|
|
client ID and scope above follow the deployed KEY-WP-0006 registration.
|
|
|
|
For approval-engine clients, set `--audience approval-engine` explicitly; the
|
|
expected audience otherwise defaults to the client ID. Both requested scopes
|
|
and audience must match the issuer's static registration. The output contains
|
|
`access_token`, `token_type`, and `expires_in`; a service exchange has no ID token.
|
|
Re-exchange before expiry for renewal. There is no refresh token or credential
|
|
cache. Client disablement stops new issuance; already-issued JWTs expire normally.
|
|
|
|
## Browser login
|
|
|
|
Use a registered **public PKCE** client with an exact literal-loopback callback:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
keycape login --issuer https://kc.coulomb.social \
|
|
--client-id APPROVER_CLIENT_ID --audience approval-engine \
|
|
--scope 'openid approval:approve' \
|
|
--redirect-uri http://127.0.0.1:REGISTERED_PORT/callback \
|
|
--out /private/runtime/approver-token.json
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Replace the client ID and port with the approved registration. This command
|
|
prints a browser authorization URL and waits up to five minutes. The provider
|
|
handles password and MFA; KeyCape CLI never receives those credentials. Configure
|
|
`mfaRequired: true` on the approver registration. State, nonce and S256 PKCE are
|
|
fresh for each attempt. The listener binds before the URL is printed, validates
|
|
callback host/path/state, and closes when the attempt ends.
|
|
|
|
Both tokens are verified against same-origin HTTPS discovery/JWKS. Access tokens
|
|
bind the expected resource audience and requested scopes. ID tokens bind the
|
|
client ID, nonce and matching subject. There is no insecure TLS switch and no
|
|
HTTP redirect following during credential exchange. Cross-origin discovery
|
|
endpoints and confidential browser clients are intentionally unsupported.
|
|
|
|
## OpenBao login boundary
|
|
|
|
The existing ops-warden login route runs
|
|
`bao login -no-print -method=oidc -path=netkingdom role=<domain>`. That produces an
|
|
**OpenBao token**, unlike KeyCape's new issuer JWT output. These commands are not
|
|
interchangeable. KeyCape owns browser authentication and issuer JWTs; OpenBao's
|
|
role mapping, token store and enforcement remain platform-owned. Do not replace
|
|
that route with `keycape login` without adapting and verifying its consumer
|
|
contract. No ops-warden route is retired by this change.
|
|
|
|
## Qonto rotation boundary
|
|
|
|
Native exchange is implemented. Rotation still needs a coordinated custody and
|
|
provider update, not a wrapper around a raw KV read. The reviewed sequence is:
|
|
|
|
1. Resolve exact existing authority for
|
|
`platform/workloads/rapp-qonto/keycape-client`, field `client_secret`, and
|
|
`sso/keycape-rapp-qonto-client`, key `client-secret`.
|
|
2. Generate the successor inside the approved custody execution transport;
|
|
retain the predecessor only there for bounded rollback and denial checks.
|
|
3. CAS-update that KV field while preserving siblings, update the matching
|
|
Kubernetes delivery reference, and restart KeyCape in the agreed window.
|
|
4. Verify the new `qonto:read` exchange, predecessor rejection and excess-scope
|
|
denial without exposing tokens; verify downstream readiness.
|
|
5. On failure, reconcile both custodians to the same version and reload KeyCape
|
|
before declaring rollback complete. Record versions and outcomes, never values.
|
|
|
|
No general rotation command is shipped until that cross-owner transaction has
|
|
an admitted execution and rollback contract. Calling secrets-engine's KV
|
|
rotation alone would leave the provider and consumers inconsistent.
|
|
|
|
Steps 1-3 are custody's and are not automated here. Step 4, and the denial
|
|
checks step 5 depends on, are KeyCape's and now have a command.
|
|
|
|
## Verifying a live registration
|
|
|
|
`keycape verify-client` proves a deployed registration behaves as its contract
|
|
says, without writing a token file or printing any value. It is the evidence for
|
|
a rollout (KEY-WP-0013-T02) and for step 4 of the rotation sequence above.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
keycape verify-client \
|
|
-issuer https://kc.coulomb.social \
|
|
-client-id secrets-engine-approval \
|
|
-audience approval-engine \
|
|
-scope "approval:read approval:consume" \
|
|
-secret-env KEYCAPE_SECRETS_ENGINE_APPROVAL_CLIENT_SECRET \
|
|
-expect-subject service:secrets-engine \
|
|
-expect-tenant tenant:platform \
|
|
-expect-roles secrets-engine \
|
|
-deny-scope "approval:approve approval:revoke"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
It checks, and prints one `PASS`/`FAIL` line per check:
|
|
|
|
- discovery resolves over HTTPS and every endpoint shares the issuer origin;
|
|
- the `client_credentials` exchange succeeds and its access token verifies RS256
|
|
against the discovered JWKS, with exact issuer, audience and validity window;
|
|
- `principal_type` is `service`, and `sub`, `tenant` and `roles` match what the
|
|
registration declares — exact comparison, no alias;
|
|
- the token carries **no scope that was not requested**, which the caller
|
|
commands do not check: they prove every requested scope was granted, not that
|
|
nothing extra came back;
|
|
- every `-deny-scope` is refused. A success there is the failure.
|
|
|
|
Add `-previous-secret-env` after a rotation to require that the predecessor is
|
|
refused. It also fails if the predecessor and current values are identical,
|
|
which means no rotation occurred.
|
|
|
|
Every check runs before the command reports, so one failure does not hide the
|
|
rest; the exit status is non-zero if any failed. Failures name the **claim**,
|
|
never the observed value — running this against production must not turn a
|
|
verification into a disclosure. Nothing is written to disk.
|
|
|
|
The command needs the client secret in the named environment variable, so it
|
|
runs wherever custody already delivers that value. It never reads OpenBao or
|
|
Kubernetes itself.
|