All checks were successful
Build and Publish Container Image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 47s
informed-decision submitted client_id informed-decision-approver and redirect https://decisions.coulomb.social/auth/callback, with the origin already live and verified by them rather than reported: both / and /auth/callback return 200 on a Let's Encrypt certificate valid to 2026-12-09. The host is decisions, not the decide of an earlier draft. Its path serves a placeholder for now, which does not matter -- the redirect is matched as an exact string and never fetched. Published as a public authorization_code client with S256 PKCE, audience approval-engine, scopes openid/approval:read/approval:approve, mfaRequired true and a declared tenant:platform. No secretRef, since PKCE is the whole proof. TestApproverRegistrationShapeIsExact pins every field, so widening a scope or relaxing MFA fails the build rather than reading as an edit, and asserts the registration passes startup validation -- proving the KEY-WP-0028 tenant exemption holds for the registration that actually depends on it. Two existing guards fired on the way in and neither was loosened. The tenant pin refused an unreviewed client carrying a tenant, which is its purpose, so the approver was added to its reviewed set deliberately. And the audience test panicked slicing secretRef[4:], an assumption that held while the fixture had only confidential clients; the approver is the first public one, so the loop now guards on the env: prefix. The declared tenant reaches the token by the GH-DEC-2026-013 gap route by construction, and tenant_source says so: registration, never directory. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NV9oijZukGyGbRQGGKnK4P Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 713576@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 384c511d-9bce-4cb8-a676-2aef6c0c8df6
101 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
101 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
# Approval-engine token contract
|
|
|
|
Static client registrations may set `audience: approval-engine`. This selects
|
|
only the access-token audience; OIDC ID tokens retain `aud=clientId`. Omitting
|
|
`audience` preserves the existing client-ID access audience, including OpenBao
|
|
consumers. Request `audience` and `resource` parameters cannot override it.
|
|
Access tokens contain the granted `scope` string for both supported grant types.
|
|
|
|
`config/service-clients.example.yaml` provides the two requested confidential
|
|
clients: secrets-engine-approval gets read/consume, and approval-engine-operator
|
|
gets lifecycle/observation scopes without consume. Service tokens contain
|
|
`principal_type=service`, tenant, roles, scope, assurance, issuer, subject,
|
|
audience, issue time and expiry; the lifetime is 15 minutes. The issuer signs
|
|
with RS256 and publishes its public key through `/jwks`.
|
|
|
|
Human approvers use the `informed-decision-approver` registration, submitted by
|
|
informed-decision on 2026-09-10 (INFD-WP-0001-T07) and published in
|
|
`config/service-clients.example.yaml`:
|
|
|
|
| Field | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| `clientId` | `informed-decision-approver` |
|
|
| `redirectUris` | `https://decisions.coulomb.social/auth/callback` (exact, sole) |
|
|
| `clientType` | `public` — PKCE is the whole proof; no secret |
|
|
| `grantTypes` | `authorization_code` with S256 PKCE |
|
|
| `audience` | `approval-engine` |
|
|
| `allowedScopes` | `openid`, `approval:read`, `approval:approve` |
|
|
| `mfaRequired` | `true` |
|
|
| `tenant` | `tenant:platform`, declared |
|
|
|
|
The host is `decisions.coulomb.social`, not the `decide.coulomb.social` an
|
|
earlier draft proposed; the origin was verified live before submission. The path
|
|
currently serves a placeholder while the surface is gated on
|
|
APPROVAL-WP-0002-T01, which does not affect the registration — the redirect is
|
|
matched as an exact string at `/authorize` and never fetched.
|
|
|
|
Do not add consume or other approval grants to that client. The ID token is for
|
|
the login client; present the access token to approval-engine.
|
|
`TestApproverRegistrationShapeIsExact` pins every field above, so widening a
|
|
scope or relaxing the MFA requirement fails the build rather than passing as an
|
|
edit.
|
|
|
|
That client must also declare `tenant: tenant:platform`. A human token's tenant
|
|
comes from the directory record, which assigns none today, so without the
|
|
declaration the token would carry `tenant:coulomb` and be refused here. See
|
|
[the tenant contract](tenant-claim-contract.md) for the four resolution rules and
|
|
for why a declared zone can never relabel a user the directory has placed.
|
|
|
|
`approval:read` is present because approval-engine showed the surface cannot
|
|
render a decision without it: `GET /v1/approvals/{id}` and `/claim` both require
|
|
it, so the earlier `[openid, approval:approve]` would have let an approver submit
|
|
an entry they were never able to display. Reading through the owning component's
|
|
own service identity would also work, but it weakens the one claim that surface
|
|
exists to make — evidence of what *this person* was shown — so the read is
|
|
granted to the human principal instead. `approval:consume` stays excluded: human
|
|
principals are refused consume in approval-engine's code regardless, and
|
|
consumption belongs to the PEP causing the side effect.
|
|
|
|
### The assurance object
|
|
|
|
KeyCape emits `assurance` on every human token, unscoped. approval-engine stores
|
|
it verbatim into the approval entry, where it is the only place `mfaRequired:
|
|
true` survives into the record, so its shape is a contract:
|
|
|
|
| Field | Type | Meaning |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| `level` | string | `aal1` or `aal2`. `aal2` exactly when MFA was verified in this authorization. The closest thing to `acr`. |
|
|
| `methods` | string[] | `["pwd"]`, or `["pwd","otp"]` when MFA was verified. The closest thing to `amr`. |
|
|
| `mfa` | bool | Whether MFA was verified. Redundant with `level` by construction, and kept because a consumer asserting on one should not have to know the mapping. |
|
|
| `source` | string | Always `key-cape`. Names which issuer made the assertion. |
|
|
| `at` | number | Unix seconds at which the user **authenticated** — not when the token was minted. |
|
|
|
|
`at` is authentication time on purpose. A reused browser session can be hours
|
|
old, and a record saying MFA happened at mint time would overstate how recently
|
|
the person proved anything. Where an authorization rides an existing session, the
|
|
original login instant is carried through.
|
|
|
|
The level is derived from what happened in *this* authorization, never from
|
|
enrollment state: a user with MFA enrolled who was not challenged gets `aal1`.
|
|
A consumer that needs a maximum age should compare `at`, not assume freshness.
|
|
|
|
These fragments are not live registrations. The two service registrations require
|
|
custody-managed values for the named environment references and a reviewed
|
|
rollout of this version, including the upstream issuer precondition. Platform's
|
|
CCR-2026-0017/0018 use OpenBao field `CLIENT_SECRET`; their approval remains open.
|
|
The human registration now carries its real UI-owned callback (above); a
|
|
bearer-only approval resource server never owned that string, which is why it
|
|
came from informed-decision. Service credentials still cannot be counted as human
|
|
approval evidence. Never log the token or secret. Verify the resulting
|
|
access token against the deployed issuer's `/jwks`, checking issuer, audience,
|
|
expiry, subject, principal type, tenant, roles, scope and assurance. Verify that
|
|
operator consume and human consume requests are rejected. Local tests verify
|
|
signatures against the JWKS handler; they do not constitute live issuance proof.
|
|
|
|
Negative verification requires the token endpoint's typed refusal: HTTP 400,
|
|
`invalid_profile_usage`, feature `scope` for excess scope; HTTP 401 with feature
|
|
`Authorization` for a predecessor secret. A timeout, 5xx, malformed response,
|
|
invalid signature or JWKS failure is not proof of denial.
|
|
|
|
KeyCape owns issuance and client grants/disablement. OpenBao and the deployment
|
|
operator own credential custody; approval-engine enforces its resource policy.
|