KEY-WP-0019-T05 rested on "existing tests pass unchanged", which shows the move onto internal/jose preserved behaviour but not that the behaviour is checked. Disabling the RSA comparison in jose.Verify fails both callers' suites, so the shared verifier is load-bearing on each path. Correct the comment on the caller-side cases added with the move. It claimed the existing tamper case fails on the signature segment's shape before any key is used; it does not — appending eight characters leaves a decodable segment, so that case does reach and does check the signature. The two new cases are still worth their place for what a byte-level tamper cannot reach: a structurally valid token signed by an unpublished key under a published kid tests that key selection is bound to the key set, and an undersized modulus in the published set tests that ParseJWKS strictness denies rather than falling through to the claims. Record both in the workplan and in G01's status. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012WAsfsfQmDu4vcBhiMcmQp Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 867844@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 3d45905e-0016-4b49-b828-231406881f7b
6.9 KiB
| id | type | title | domain | repo | status | owner | topic_slug | created | updated | state_hub_workstream_id |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEY-WP-0019 | workplan | Verify upstream Authelia ID tokens | infotech | key-cape | finished | claude | upstream-provider-token-verification | 2026-09-07 | 2026-09-07 | 87ea18ea-dc60-52ce-baf4-476b46aa06f9 |
Closes the remaining half of gap G01 in
history/2026-09-05-011726-scope-intent-assessment.md. The Authelia adapter
decodes upstream ID-token claims without verifying the signature, issuer,
audience or expiry, justified in a comment by a server-to-server TLS boundary.
Operator decision (2026-09-07, Bernd): verify the token itself. The KeyCape→Authelia hop is to be HTTPS as defence in depth, but KeyCape will not monitor, check or gate on that — transport enforcement is friction without protection value here, and a check that must be configured correctly to help is itself a failure mode. Verification is chosen precisely because it does not depend on the transport being what we believe it is. No HTTPS validation, opt-in flag or transport telemetry is to be added.
Extract a shared RS256/JWKS verifier
id: KEY-WP-0019-T01
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "68c1b099-96b4-5065-a4be-8592438a0ca9"
internal/authclient already contains a strict RS256 verifier — kid required,
no crit, RSA-only keys of at least 2048 bits with an odd exponent. The upstream
verification needs the same rules. Duplicating security-critical verification is
how two copies drift and one silently misses a fix, so extract the reusable half
into internal/jose: strict JWK-set parsing and signature verification returning
claims. Claim policy stays with each caller, whose audience, nonce and issuer
rules genuinely differ.
Added internal/jose: strict JWK-set parsing (RSA signing keys only, at least
2048 bits, odd exponent 3 or greater, no duplicate key ids) and RS256 signature
verification returning claims. All failures collapse to one ErrVerification
so a caller cannot leak which check failed back to whoever supplied the token.
authclient is not yet migrated onto it — see T05.
Verify the Authelia ID token
id: KEY-WP-0019-T02
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "8105030b-c91f-5a40-a221-4a38c8531e1c"
Before trusting any claim from the upstream ID token: verify the RS256 signature against Authelia's published keys, require the issuer Authelia advertises, require KeyCape's own client ID in the audience, and reject expired or not-yet-valid tokens. Fail closed — an unavailable or unparseable key set denies the login rather than falling back to unverified claims. Resolve Authelia's metadata and key set from the server-side token base URL so a split-horizon deployment, where the advertised public URL is not reachable from KeyCape, still verifies; allow explicit issuer and JWKS overrides for deployments where that inference is wrong. Refresh the key set once on an unknown key id so provider key rotation does not require a KeyCape restart. Replace the comment claiming the TLS boundary as justification.
idTokenVerifier in the adapter resolves the issuer and JWKS path from the
provider's discovery document, rebasing the advertised jwks_uri path onto the
server-side token base URL so split-horizon deployments resolve, with
issuer/jwksUrl config overrides where that inference is wrong. Key sets are
cached and refetched once on an unknown key id. parseIDTokenClaims remains for
diagnostics but is documented as outside the authentication path.
Prove the rejections
id: KEY-WP-0019-T03
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "163f64dd-aa87-5ce3-b3be-d134fa993eb6"
Negative tests per condition: forged signature, alg: none and other algorithms,
unknown key id, wrong issuer, missing and wrong audience, expired token, future
iat/nbf, malformed key set, and an unreachable JWKS endpoint. A positive case
must confirm a genuine token still authenticates, and a rotation case that a new
key id is picked up after one refresh.
Thirteen rejection cases in verify_test.go plus the algorithm and rotation
cases. Confirmed they catch the original defect rather than merely passing: with
the unverified parse restored, all fifteen fail. The existing adapter tests now
build genuinely signed tokens against a fixture provider, so they exercise the
real verification path instead of being routed around it.
Reconcile the records
id: KEY-WP-0019-T04
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "8a208092-7e85-5ad9-a8c4-0dddc66aaaee"
Update SCOPE.md and G01's status in the assessment to state that upstream
provider tokens are now verified independently of transport, and record the
operator decision and its reasoning so the absence of transport enforcement reads
as a choice rather than an oversight. G01 closes with this; complete profile
conformance is still not claimed.
SCOPE.md and G01's status record the verification and the operator decision, including why no transport enforcement exists, so its absence reads as a choice.
Consolidate the caller verifier
id: KEY-WP-0019-T05
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "0dc909fe-1772-5816-9e11-dbe7664a4e1f"
Move internal/authclient's inline verification onto internal/jose so one
implementation serves both paths. Kept separate from T01/T02 deliberately: the
caller verifier is a tested security path, and destabilising it in the same
change that introduces upstream verification would confuse the evidence for both.
Client.Verify now fetches the raw key set and delegates parsing and signature
checking to internal/jose, keeping its own claim policy — audience and nonce
bindings are the caller's and cannot live in a shared verifier. Its existing
tests pass unchanged, which is the point: the migration preserved behaviour.
One deliberate strictness increase: a key set containing any malformed RSA
signing key is now refused outright, where the previous code would have used a
good key alongside a bad one. KeyCape's own /jwks publishes a single key, so
this affects no current deployment.
Also added direct tests for internal/jose (17 cases). It is now the single
verifier behind both paths, so testing it only through its callers would leave
its edges — duplicate key ids, crit, even exponents, undersized moduli — to be
covered by accident.
Follow-on evidence for the same task: "existing tests pass unchanged" shows the
move preserved behaviour, not that the behaviour is checked, so the check was
made explicit. Disabling the RSA comparison in jose.Verify fails both callers'
suites, which establishes the shared verifier is load-bearing on each path.
Added two caller-side cases the existing tamper case cannot reach, since it
alters signature bytes for a key that is legitimately published: a structurally
valid token signed by an unpublished key under a published kid, which fails only
if key selection is bound to the key set, and an undersized modulus in the
published set, which must deny rather than fall through to the claims.