Classify evidence as load-bearing or attributive, draft the emission-cadence
declaration for Taxonomy, treat silence as a stream finding, keep completeness
separate from record richness, forbid immune memory as a state plane, and make
containment proposals reconstructable to their origin. Observe real
qonto-assistant audit events; deny-class completeness stays unknown until the
source publishes a heartbeat.
Assistant: grok
Assistant-Session: 01a05ef1-9e5a-70f2-b0ff-0b05d6b38ae9
The standard is accepted at v0.7 with a working companion. v0.7 wrote the
§3.4 agent-principal rules that v0.6 announced and never wrote — our
finding — and credits kings-guard for it. Our other two findings landed
too: the actuation row is no longer attributed to us, and §17 records
kings-guard as drafter of the emission-cadence declaration.
INTENT.md now carries the declaration in frontmatter (layer: Staff,
conformance_state: blocked-clean) as the companion asks, plus prose in
our own voice. Adopted: the four agent-principal rules; the evidence
doctrine and our obligations under it; containment reframed as proposal
throughout. Direction of Evolution stage 3 rewritten — it described
integrating with effectors to actuate, which §9.2 forbids — and stage 5
now carries the constraint that federated memory may not become a state
plane.
SCOPE.md gains evidence classification, the cadence draft, and
stream-completeness judgment as in-scope; actuation, standing
credentials, and becoming a state plane as explicitly out.
history/2026-08-29-layer-model-v0.7-scope-intent-review.md assesses the
adapted documents against the implementation. The finding: the documents
are now correct and the code has not caught up. Nine gaps, G1-G8 carried
by KG-WP-0003, G9 remaining as KG-IN-0002.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UEtvmYUBP2fDtirJGWn5MW
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 4014379@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4af9e20f-1768-4afc-951b-b507784e382b
The standard moved v0.4 -> v0.6. All four findings from our v0.4 review
were adopted in v0.5, and v0.6 went further on two of them.
§11 now requires a machine-readable declaration — prose cannot
distinguish a declaration from a transcribed review. We had none.
Added layer.yaml (form adapted from ops-warden's reference
implementation), scripts/check_layer_conformance.py, and
tests/test_layer_conformance.py.
The check makes our central claim mechanical rather than asserted: no
direct Tooling client in src/. The test exercises the negative case on a
synthetic tree, so it fails if the checker goes blind. pyyaml is added as
a DEV dependency only — `dependencies = []` is load-bearing for the §5
claim and stays empty.
Adopted from v0.6:
- containment is no longer ours (§9.2). Actuation is an Engine concept,
unowned and held at zero; kings-guard proposes containment and never
performs it. The register row is now a dependency, not our gap.
- observation is scoped to Staff-reachable sources, with identity and
secret observation pending — our finding 1, adopted near-verbatim.
- access-engine DECLINED the authentication-evidence gap; owner is now
the identity layer plus audit-core, reproposed and unassented.
- §11 blocked-clean recorded, with the rule that it must not rank below
conforming — our finding 2.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UEtvmYUBP2fDtirJGWn5MW
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 4014379@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4af9e20f-1768-4afc-951b-b507784e382b
