net-kingdom/docs/crisis-custody-list.md
tegwick dcb5bc2540
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 1s
NK-WP-0054: founder decision 9f0f7a87 - split goes live this week, admin dispositions, crisis list confirmed
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 308701@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 5548e447-444c-4dcc-bed1-05c16eebfe56
2026-10-28 18:53:10 +01:00

9.3 KiB

Crisis custody list

NK-WP-0054-T07. Drafted 2026-10-24 from repository documents and the founder's statements that day. This list holds no secret value, ever. It names what unlocks recovery, who holds it, where, and whether using it needs the very services being recovered. Anything the repository cannot establish is marked TO CONFIRM; the founder confirms each one.

It belongs with the backup documentation: disaster recovery guide, identity restore drill and Credential Management Standard §4. That standard names the custody categories. This list makes them concrete.

The one rule

For every row, answer: does using this item work when SSO and OpenBao are down? A recovery path that is satisfied only by logging in to something being restored is a circular dependency and is recorded as a gap, not as custody.

Roles used below

Role Identity Used for
Crisis operator admin Runs recovery and routine validation (founder intent, 2026-10-24)
Authorizer platform-root / king credential Break-glass authority from offline custody; nothing routine
Developer tegwick Builds and tests tooling; holds no recovery keys

Items

# Item Unlocks Holder and location Works with SSO and OpenBao down? Last proven use Gap or action
1 railiance-backup age private key (recipient age1zvry…50syr3tsz). Not the custodian key (item 1b) Decrypts the identity backup bundle and the break-glass copy on Storage Share (net-kingdom-kingpath-*.tar.age) Two copies: founder's password safe (stored as railiance-backup.key) and a copy held by a named trusted person, who can recover if the founder cannot (founder, 2026-10-28) Yes, offline Identity stages 2026-10-24; king-path verify drill 2026-10-27 (the helper refused the custodian key three times before the correct key was entered, as designed) Successor copy is not drill-proven; prove it once with kingpath-offsite.py --verify run by or with the successor
1b Custodian age private key (recipient age1aq8t…qdepsh4, keys/age.pub and .sops.yaml). Not the backup key Decrypts the repository's SOPS custody files and greenfield bootstrap bundles (docs/security-bootstrap-age-custody.md) Founder, password safe (stored as the custodian age private key) Yes, offline 2026-10, bootstrap/SOPS work (founder, 2026-10-28; not yet receipt-proven: run make sops-custody-check) Labels in the safe should name the recipient prefix so the two keys cannot be confused
2 Storage Share Backup account app password Downloads the protected ciphertext without OpenBao or SSO Founder, in the independent password safe (founder, 2026-10-28) Yes, provider is outside the platform Fresh retrieval 2026-10-24 One provider copy only; residual risk accepted until 2027-01-31 (G1, NK-WP-0053)
3 OpenBao unseal shares (2 of 3 required in the restore drill) Unseals a restored or production OpenBao; with the shares, generate-root mints a root token for break-glass (ceremony in railiance-platform/docs/openbao.md; production loopback listener 8210 live since 2026-10-28) Founder as platform-root holds all three shares (single-holder custody: accepted exception, hub decision 37464824, 2026-10-27), in the founder's replicated browser password safe under the kingpath.credentials pseudo-URL entry (confirmed 2026-10-27) Yes: the safe is independent of NetKingdom SSO and OpenBao; it depends on the browser vendor's sync account and its own factor Original shares used in the isolated restore RPF-WP-0064-T07, 2026-10-24 Single holder = single point of loss (reviewed at NK-WP-0055-T09). The founder holds the initial root token offline; the king-path drill (2026-10-28) found it valid as of the 2026-10-14 snapshot (root policy, no TTL, orphan). Founder decision 7ce684ec (2026-10-28): stays escrowed during builder mode, revoked at production entry (NK-WP-0055-T16)
4 platform-root / king account and factors Final authority; break-glass Independently held password safe (kingpath entry) No if used through KeyCape. The king path with SSO down is offline material instead: unseal shares (item 3) plus the generate-root ceremony on the loopback listener, the admin kubeconfig and static tunnel key (item 9, also on Storage Share), the Host Europe console, and the admission signing key (item 5) OTP validated against restored privacyIDEA 2026-10-24 (isolated). King path drilled 2026-10-28: Storage Share restore of item 9, generate-root on an isolated restore, read-only production SSO-down walk (record) Not drilled: using the restored item-9 material against the cluster, and the Host Europe console. Both belong in the recurring drill (NK-WP-0053)
5 Founder admission signing key (SSH ed25519, principal bernd, fingerprint SHA256:NekDABfw8K8IBYznjREg7jPpcK/BzCgO1pH1ebT/FXM) Signs restore and drill admissions for the OpenBao isolated restore (namespace railiance-openbao-restore-attempt) and secrets-engine admissions Private key: founder workstation ~/.ssh/gexec_approver_ed25519 (passphrase-protected; signed the T40, -02 and -03 admissions); founder decision 2026-10-28: also keep it in the password safe under the kingpath entry, not in the Storage Share bundle, so the backup age key alone cannot admit a restore. Public anchor (non-secret, needed on any recovery workstation): /etc/railiance-openbao-restore/allowed_signers and /etc/secrets-engine/admission/allowed_signers, one line each: bernd namespaces="railiance-openbao-restore-attempt" ssh-ed25519 ssh-ed25519 ; the secrets-engine file uses namespace secrets-engine-recovery-attempt Yes, offline Signed the T40 admission 2026-10-23 Private key stored in the password safe kingpath entry (founder, 2026-10-28). Re-create both anchor files from this row on a recovery workstation. The file name says gexec_approver, but the key's role is admission signing
6 admin password and OTP token Day-to-day platform administration and, per intent, recovery operation Founder; OTP enrolled 2026-10-24 No: login and token checks need KeyCape, LLDAP and privacyIDEA Token not yet in any restored backup; first restore proof after the 2026-10-25 03:45 UTC capture Same account as the directory bind used by Authelia and privacyIDEA until the split in NK-WP-0054-T05
7 pi-admin credentials (privacyIDEA internal admin) Token repair and re-enrolment Founder's replicated browser password safe (confirmed 2026-10-27) Custody yes (replicated, independent of SSO); use needs a running privacyIDEA Not yet drilled Add a pi-admin check to the drill (NK-WP-0053-T04)
8 Ops bundle (make creds-bundle) Retired 2026-10-27 (founder decision) — — — Never drilled; none existed on the workstation Superseded by the daily identity backup, which carries the current service secrets. make creds-bundle packs only greenfield creds-generate output and stays a greenfield bootstrap step
9 Operator access to the production host or cluster for a real restore Applying a restore to production Cluster: ops-bridge tunnel k3s-api-railiance01 (SSH as tegwick to 92.205.62.239 with a static key file, local port 16444) plus the attended admin kubeconfig ~/.kube/config-railiance01 (client certificate), today on the founder workstation only. Host: Host Europe provider interface with console and rescue access to railiance01 (confirmed 2026-10-27) Yes: static key, client certificate and provider console need neither KeyCape nor OpenBao. No for ops-warden SSH certificates (warden's backend is OpenBao) Cluster path used 2026-10-27 Off-workstation copy uploaded and read back 2026-10-27: Backup/railiance-backups/net-kingdom-kingpath/net-kingdom-kingpath-20261027T223050Z-8c9d48421f1b.tar.age (10440 bytes, sha256 8c9d4842…7dd4aa, items admin-kubeconfig, tunnel-ssh-key, recipient railiance-backup; receipt on the founder workstation). Restore drilled 2026-10-27: fetched from Storage Share, unrelated key refused, decrypted in memory, both items intact (kingpath-offsite.py --verify). Using the restored material against the cluster is not drilled. Re-run kingpath-offsite.py whenever the kubeconfig or key changes. Open: runs as tegwick under an agent-labelled actor; provider console never drilled

Non-secret recovery assets

These need no custody but must be reachable: the published recovery kit on Storage Share (guide, tools ZIP, checksum; verify the checksum against a trusted copy), the pinned container images, and a trusted checkout of this repository. TLS for kc.coulomb.social has no custody: it is reissued through ACME and needs working public DNS and HTTP-01.

Maintenance

  • Review at every restore drill (NK-WP-0053), and record the date each item was last proven. An item never proven stays marked as such.
  • Loss or suspected exposure of any item goes to its owner's rotation and revocation process (Standard §6); this list rotates nothing.
  • A machine-readable, non-secret record with a freshness check, modelled on tools/custody-record, is proposed in NK-WP-0054-T07. Until then this document is the list.