tegwick
dff106073b
INTENT.md establishes the four-phase process (construction plan ->
review/optimize -> executive summary -> build), grounded in ops-warden's
own charter: ops-warden explicitly disclaims being a builder/provisioner
("owns no secret store and vends nothing", routes provisioning
elsewhere) and states its own design principle that "the founder is
escalated to, never tasked with mechanics" -- ops-mason's executive
summary gate is that principle applied to the provisioning side, turning
today's ad hoc founder Red-lane bao commands into a reviewed, repeatable
process.
MASON-WP-0001 stands up the four phases and exercises the whole
pipeline on real, already-waiting demand: the rein-openweights OpenBao
AppRole that glas-harness/GLAS-WP-0002-T02 is blocked on.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
893 B
893 B
ops-mason
The builder of NetKingdom security infrastructure — creates, changes, maintains, and tears down access routes, credentials, tokens, and policies so that ops-warden always has something real to route to.
- Why and boundaries: INTENT.md
- Current work: workplans/
The four-phase process
- Construction plan — given an access demand, draft what needs building, respecting/extending/compacting existing structure first.
- Review and optimize — self-review the plan against what already exists, for consistency and ease of use.
- Executive summary — the one mandatory human decision gate: render who gets what access, for how long, and what it costs to reverse.
- Build — once approved, execute the plan.
See INTENT.md for the full responsibility boundary against ops-warden,
OpenBao, flex-auth, and key-cape.