156 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
156 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
id: UPC-WP-0001
|
|||
|
|
type: workplan
|
|||
|
|
title: "Project foundation and gate map"
|
|||
|
|
domain: infotech
|
|||
|
|
repo: prj-unattended-progress-company
|
|||
|
|
status: active
|
|||
|
|
owner: bernd
|
|||
|
|
topic_slug: infotech
|
|||
|
|
repo_goal_id: "79a2b057-b765-47ad-b5d9-c1bbc49eba43"
|
|||
|
|
created: "2026-08-09"
|
|||
|
|
updated: "2026-08-09"
|
|||
|
|
quality_dor: DoR-Ok
|
|||
|
|
quality_dor_at: "2026-08-09"
|
|||
|
|
quality_dor_by: "grok"
|
|||
|
|
quality_dor_note: "Foundation plan maps GOAL.md gates G1–G9 to evidence and child repos; no production code in this WP."
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
# Project foundation and gate map
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Goal
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Stand up this `prj-` repository as the coordination surface for the active
|
|||
|
|
repo goal: make **Binky Hedgehog GmbH** a profitable, self-organizing company
|
|||
|
|
with minimal CEO time and governance.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Deliverables of this workplan:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1. Project files and State Hub registration are complete and consistent.
|
|||
|
|
2. A gate map links every `GOAL.md` success gate (G1–G9) to evidence homes and
|
|||
|
|
participating repos — without duplicating child task lists.
|
|||
|
|
3. A child-workplan map records existing and missing implementation streams
|
|||
|
|
(especially in `binky-control`).
|
|||
|
|
4. The next coordination workplans are scoped so unattended progress can start
|
|||
|
|
against open gates.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Implementation remains in participating repositories. This workplan only
|
|||
|
|
coordinates.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Register project and establish GOAL as hub goal
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```task
|
|||
|
|
id: UPC-WP-0001-T01
|
|||
|
|
status: done
|
|||
|
|
priority: high
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Create `GOAL.md` (prj-flavor), `.repo-classification.yaml`, `SCOPE.md`,
|
|||
|
|
`AGENTS.md`, and genesis history. Register the repo in State Hub and create
|
|||
|
|
the active repo goal from `GOAL.md`.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Result (2026-08-09):**
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- Repo slug `prj-unattended-progress-company` registered
|
|||
|
|
(`01cc54ec-178d-4547-b17d-24bd97997987`), domain `infotech`, category
|
|||
|
|
`project`.
|
|||
|
|
- Active repo goal
|
|||
|
|
`79a2b057-b765-47ad-b5d9-c1bbc49eba43` —
|
|||
|
|
*Profitable self-organizing Binky Hedgehog GmbH with minimal CEO time and
|
|||
|
|
governance*.
|
|||
|
|
- Progress event recorded for registration + goal create.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Build the gate-to-evidence map
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```task
|
|||
|
|
id: UPC-WP-0001-T02
|
|||
|
|
status: todo
|
|||
|
|
priority: high
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Produce `architecture/gate-map.md` (or `inventory/gate-map.yaml` if more
|
|||
|
|
machine-friendly) covering every success gate G1–G9:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
| Column | Content |
|
|||
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|||
|
|
| Gate | G1…G9 id + short title from `GOAL.md` |
|
|||
|
|
| Owning repo(s) | Where implementation and evidence live |
|
|||
|
|
| Known child workplans / loops | Stable IDs only (e.g. BINKY-WP-*) |
|
|||
|
|
| Evidence path or missing | File/URL or `missing` |
|
|||
|
|
| Status | `open` / `partial` / `met` |
|
|||
|
|
| Blockers | Human-only / external / dependency |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Do not copy task lists from child repos. Link by ID only.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Inventory current company state against G1–G9
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```task
|
|||
|
|
id: UPC-WP-0001-T03
|
|||
|
|
status: todo
|
|||
|
|
priority: high
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
From `binky-control` (and only other repos when the gate demands it), write a
|
|||
|
|
baseline snapshot under `inventory/`:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- Admin / legal / tax / banking posture (G1)
|
|||
|
|
- Company OS artefacts in force (G2)
|
|||
|
|
- Autopilot / dogfood / executor evidence (G3)
|
|||
|
|
- Founder-load measurement approach or gap (G4)
|
|||
|
|
- Offer and revenue path status (G5–G7)
|
|||
|
|
- Decision / office-hour queue thinness (G8)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Prefer pointers into existing `binky-control` docs
|
|||
|
|
(`CompanyReactivationPlan.md`, `SuccessMilestones.md`, workplans
|
|||
|
|
BINKY-WP-0001…0007, audits) over rewriting canon here.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Establish the child-workplan map
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```task
|
|||
|
|
id: UPC-WP-0001-T04
|
|||
|
|
status: todo
|
|||
|
|
priority: high
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Create `architecture/child-workplan-map.md` listing:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1. **Existing** child workplans that already advance G1–G9 (status + gate
|
|||
|
|
tags).
|
|||
|
|
2. **Gaps** — gates with no live child workplan or residual.
|
|||
|
|
3. **Recommended next child streams** (one line each; create files only in
|
|||
|
|
the owning repo, not here).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Initial known participants: `binky-control`, `ops-warden`, ecosystem pillars
|
|||
|
|
as referenced by offers/delivery. Update `SCOPE.md` participating table if
|
|||
|
|
the map adds repos.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Scope the next project coordination workplans
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```task
|
|||
|
|
id: UPC-WP-0001-T05
|
|||
|
|
status: todo
|
|||
|
|
priority: medium
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Based on T02–T04, draft (as `proposed` files under `workplans/`, or as a
|
|||
|
|
single sequencing note if one cluster dominates) the next `UPC-WP-*` plans
|
|||
|
|
for open gate clusters, for example:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- Company vessel close-out (G1–G2 residuals)
|
|||
|
|
- Unattended dogfood + load envelope (G3–G4)
|
|||
|
|
- First external offer and paid revenue (G5–G6)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Each draft must name the parent repo goal, linked child IDs, and acceptance
|
|||
|
|
evidence expected back into this project — still without owning production
|
|||
|
|
implementation.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Done when
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- T01 remains done and hub/file IDs stay consistent after `statehub
|
|||
|
|
fix-consistency`.
|
|||
|
|
- Gate map, baseline inventory, and child-workplan map exist and cover G1–G9.
|
|||
|
|
- At least one next `UPC-WP-*` (or explicit sequencing decision) is ready for
|
|||
|
|
review so foundation can finish without leaving an unowned vacuum.
|
|||
|
|
- Residuals from this workplan are live work records (next WPs or intakes),
|
|||
|
|
not prose-only leftovers.
|