2.8 KiB
| id | type | status | received | reviewed | reviewer | source | consumer | resulting_workplan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMASTER-DEMAND-2026-08-18-001 | demand-review | accepted | 2026-08-18 | 2026-08-18 | codex | operator | railiance-master maintainers and architecture consumers | RMASTER-WP-0024 |
Review: align railiance-master with InfoTechCanon and policy-nexus
Demand signal
Review and update the repository's intent and current scope against the newer
InfoTechCanon repository structure and policy-nexus authority model, then
identify and execute the obvious alignment work.
Consumer purpose
Maintainers and downstream Railiance repositories need to tell, without reconstructing context from multiple repos:
- what architecture this repository owns;
- which general concepts it imports from InfoTechCanon;
- which accepted records are policy sources;
- which responsibilities belong to the permanent publisher; and
- how inbound architecture requests become reviewed work.
Purpose fit
Strong fit. INTENT.md already names this repository as the Railiance
framework architecture home. Clarifying semantic-canon, content-authority, and
publication boundaries strengthens that purpose without adding an implementation
layer.
Scope pressure
The demand exposed three current-scope gaps rather than a request to broaden the mission:
INTENT.mdandSCOPE.mddid not distinguish InfoTechCanon authority, Railiance-specific authority, andpolicy-nexuspublication.- Eight accepted ADRs were discovered by
policy-nexusbut lacked required publication metadata and addressing. - The repo had no explicit pre-work intake, so State Hub messages could be promoted to workplans without a durable purpose/scope review.
It also exposed housekeeping pressure: completed workplans remained in the active retrieval directory despite a repository-specific archive convention.
Evidence reviewed
INTENT.md,SCOPE.md,README.md, and.repo-classification.yamldocs/adr/ADR-0001throughADR-0008schemas/,tools/,workplans/, andhistory/- InfoTechCanon ITC-REPO-LAYOUT 0.1.0-RC1 and consumer review kit
policy-nexus/INTENT.md, publication contract, and source inventory
Disposition
Accepted as RMASTER-WP-0024.
The work belongs here because it changes the architecture repository's own
interfaces and source metadata. Downstream address selection and rendering are
routed to policy-nexus; the publisher does not edit the source records.
Outcome
- Intent and scope authority boundaries were corrected.
- Repository-layout conformance became explicit and later advanced to
corethrough the reviewed demand intake demonstrated by this record. - ADR source metadata became renderer-compatible; downstream publication remains separately owned.
- Remaining alignment work is tracked in
RMASTER-WP-0024rather than inferred from the original request.