Layer declaration (gate-house). INTENT.md now carries the declaration in its own
voice with layer.yaml as the machine-readable form, adapted from ops-warden's
reference. railiance-platform is Staff: operating OpenBao is not a claim to the
Tooling layer, because §4 is explicit that no operator-of-third-party-Tooling
shape exists and that someone running it stays a declared gap. Six direct
Tooling contacts are mapped by capability rather than by file — one §5.2
conduit, one §5.1 diagnostic, four §5.3 gaps with intended owners and review
dates — and the uncatalogued contacts are listed so the check is total. We are
PEP-shaped and the unreachable-engine stance map is NOT published; that is
recorded as an open obligation to build against v0.8, not left silent.
Placement admission. canned-prompts was added as a PostgresConsumer on
platform-pg-2 in rapp-postgres 1b68b4c without a placement owner here, which is
exactly the cross-repo drift the assurance check exists to catch; the check had
been failing on it. Registered with its real boundary evidence, corrected the
stale test expectation that pinned the overflow cell at one consumer, and
updated the SCOPE occupancy line to 2/4.
Also records owner input received today: key-cape's issuer view on CCR-2026-0020's
presenting actor, and their confirmation that codex-railiance-platform correctly
stays tenant:coulomb, so the flagged T02 discrepancy is closed as not-a-defect.
The whynot-design npm field is NOT changed. Two dated live receipts here name
NPM_AUTH_TOKEN as the field, including an attended founder fetch; that is
recorded against the counterparty claim rather than either side being flipped
before the session settles it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WLUjpv3ssxNRAEPPgLFnEB
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1275505@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 97265baa-f08f-4032-b290-a1e2965a69c5
RPF-WP-0035-T06. Adds CCR-2026-0019 (secrets-engine) and CCR-2026-0020
(approval-engine-operator) with their exact-path read policies, reusing the
existing version-1 custody from the verifier activation. No reseed, rotation,
shared reader or verifier Secret reuse; both requests are in_flight and nothing
is applied.
The two shapes were decided by read-only survey rather than assumed.
secrets-engine consumes its client secret through an operator-run CLI reading a
protected file, and its namespace holds no workload, so reader 1 is an attended
operator-workstation OIDC lane rather than an ESO lane; its one missing input is
the operator group claim, which NetKingdom and KeyCape own. approval-engine is
not deployed and no owner source names who presents the operator client, so
reader 2 records the undetermined actor instead of guessing one for the widest
approval scope in the pair. Both declare openbao.auth missing rather than
carrying a placeholder binding.
T06 moves to wait on those two owner inputs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WLUjpv3ssxNRAEPPgLFnEB
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1275505@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 97265baa-f08f-4032-b290-a1e2965a69c5
