Layer declaration (gate-house). INTENT.md now carries the declaration in its own
voice with layer.yaml as the machine-readable form, adapted from ops-warden's
reference. railiance-platform is Staff: operating OpenBao is not a claim to the
Tooling layer, because §4 is explicit that no operator-of-third-party-Tooling
shape exists and that someone running it stays a declared gap. Six direct
Tooling contacts are mapped by capability rather than by file — one §5.2
conduit, one §5.1 diagnostic, four §5.3 gaps with intended owners and review
dates — and the uncatalogued contacts are listed so the check is total. We are
PEP-shaped and the unreachable-engine stance map is NOT published; that is
recorded as an open obligation to build against v0.8, not left silent.
Placement admission. canned-prompts was added as a PostgresConsumer on
platform-pg-2 in rapp-postgres 1b68b4c without a placement owner here, which is
exactly the cross-repo drift the assurance check exists to catch; the check had
been failing on it. Registered with its real boundary evidence, corrected the
stale test expectation that pinned the overflow cell at one consumer, and
updated the SCOPE occupancy line to 2/4.
Also records owner input received today: key-cape's issuer view on CCR-2026-0020's
presenting actor, and their confirmation that codex-railiance-platform correctly
stays tenant:coulomb, so the flagged T02 discrepancy is closed as not-a-defect.
The whynot-design npm field is NOT changed. Two dated live receipts here name
NPM_AUTH_TOKEN as the field, including an attended founder fetch; that is
recorded against the counterparty claim rather than either side being flipped
before the session settles it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WLUjpv3ssxNRAEPPgLFnEB
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1275505@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 97265baa-f08f-4032-b290-a1e2965a69c5
S3 has carried Q1 Security and Compliance for months - approval gates,
delegated apply, revocation semantics, front-door readiness - without the
dimension ever being named. Naming it does not change what this layer does; it
makes the responsibility legible to the rest of the fleet.
Also draws the line the other way: observability is Q2 and belongs to
railiance-telemetry, so S3's obligation is to emit through the standard contract
rather than build its own monitoring. The recoverability half is Q3 and remains
unowned.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Author the repository's INTENT: the shared platform-services layer — the
dependable, backed-up, secure foundation of stateful services (data,
cache, secret custody, object storage, messaging) that consumers build on,
behind stable interfaces and independently evolvable underneath.
Intent is kept self-coherent and reference-free (no external project or
dependency-product references), describing this repository's own purpose
at the abstract, stable level.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
