Agentic tool-use harness for current open-weight models via OpenRouter/ llm-connect, as an alternative to frontier-model-vendor harnesses (Claude Code, Grok CLI, Codex/GPT CLI). Chartered by glas-harness ADR-001. Local scaffold only, no Forgejo remote yet. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
50 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
50 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
# INTENT
|
|
|
|
> Why rein-openweights exists, its boundary, and what it must never
|
|
> become. Established by glas-harness
|
|
> `docs/adr/ADR-001-rein-harness-family.md`.
|
|
|
|
## Why it exists
|
|
|
|
Every current agent harness in the ecosystem (Claude Code, Grok CLI,
|
|
Codex/GPT CLI) is a frontier-model-vendor harness: it only drives that
|
|
vendor's own model. There is no way to run a current open-weight model
|
|
through an equivalent agentic tool-use loop (plan → tool call → observe →
|
|
repeat, with a bounded tool policy) without building one from scratch per
|
|
occasion.
|
|
|
|
rein-openweights exists to be that harness: one agentic loop, model
|
|
supplied via OpenRouter (through `llm-connect`), usable anywhere a
|
|
rein-aharness-equivalent session is wanted but a frontier-vendor
|
|
dependency is not — cost-sensitive workloads, offline/degraded-network
|
|
tolerance, or simply comparing open-weight model capability against
|
|
frontier baselines on the same task.
|
|
|
|
## Governing principle
|
|
|
|
It is a **rein** — a concrete harness backend under glas-harness's
|
|
router, implementing the same harness contract as `rein-aharness`
|
|
(session lifecycle, tool dispatch + policy, sandbox consumption via
|
|
sand-boxer, State Hub reporting). It does not reimplement any of that
|
|
framework machinery itself; glas-harness owns the contract, this repo
|
|
owns the open-weight-model-specific agentic loop and tool execution.
|
|
|
|
## What it must never become
|
|
|
|
- **Not a model router.** Choosing which OpenRouter model to use for a
|
|
given task, pricing, and fallback stays in `llm-connect`. This repo
|
|
consumes `llm-connect`, it does not reimplement provider routing.
|
|
- **Not a second harness framework.** Session semantics, tool policy
|
|
schema, sandbox consumption, and audit reporting are glas-harness's
|
|
contract (`GLAS-WP-0001-T01`) — this repo implements it, not forks it.
|
|
- **Not a sandbox provisioner.** Isolation comes from sand-boxer via
|
|
glas-harness, the same as every other rein.
|
|
- **Not tenant-specific logic.** Anything specific to one consumer
|
|
belongs in that consumer's configuration, not hardcoded here.
|
|
|
|
## Status
|
|
|
|
Charter + local scaffold only. See `workplans/REIN-OW-WP-0001-bootstrap.md`
|
|
for the first concrete milestone (minimal tool-use loop against one
|
|
OpenRouter open-weight model, same starter tool surface as
|
|
rein-aharness's `green-commit-only` profile).
|