Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
77caca1ab8 chore(registrar): register WNCTL-WP to whynot-control
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2583210@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: f2bff2d5-e9b2-4338-92ca-10282a927006
2026-08-28 14:15:10 +02:00
906cc2d7a9 fix(registrar): OPS-WP belongs to ops-hub, not retirement
I retired OPS-WP on the reasoning that it names an ops family rather than a
repository, without checking whether a repo owns it. ops-hub does: all 14 of
its workplans use it. The anomaly is the reverse of what I wrote - the 16
OPS-WP ids in ops-bridge are the strays, against its 73 BRIDGE-WP ids.

Recorded as debt rather than fixed here: re-keying those 16 to BRIDGE-WP is a
separate migration with its own hub retirements, and today's pass is scoped to
ad-hoc identifiers.

WHYNOT-WP stays with whynot-design (26 ids vs whynot-control's 6), ruled by
Bernd. whynot-control's 6 are the same class of stray.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2583210@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: f2bff2d5-e9b2-4338-92ca-10282a927006
2026-08-28 00:58:57 +02:00
0e04329ae0 chore(registrar): register RAIL-FAB-WP and WHYNOT-WP
Both needed for the archived ad-hoc pass; each used consistently in its repo
(160 and 26 ids) with no collision against an existing owner or retired prefix.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2583210@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: f2bff2d5-e9b2-4338-92ca-10282a927006
2026-08-28 00:34:06 +02:00
5acb21a0de chore(registrar): register 14 repository prefixes, retire NET-WP and OPS-WP
Qualifying ad-hoc identifiers requires every repo to own a registered prefix,
and 13 of the 17 affected repos were absent from the registry despite using a
prefix consistently across dozens of files. None collided with an existing
owner or a retired prefix.

net-kingdom and ops-bridge each used two forms. NK-WP (229 ids vs NET-WP's 49)
and BRIDGE-WP (73 vs OPS-WP's 16) are the owners, ruled by Bernd. OPS-WP is
additionally retired for naming an ops family rather than a repository - the
same defect ADR-007 retired RAILIANCE-WP and PRJ-WP for. Existing NET-WP and
OPS-WP ids stay as they are; only their prefixes are closed to new work.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2583210@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: f2bff2d5-e9b2-4338-92ca-10282a927006
2026-08-28 00:28:47 +02:00
04145a59d9 feat: model repo standards and detect prefix collisions
Implement RMGR-WP-0004 T01 (flavor, required files, anti-patterns from
canon) and T08 (prefix ownership registry plus uniqueness scan).
rmgr conform and rmgr prefix-uniqueness are detection only.
2026-08-18 13:28:40 +02:00