Account holder confirmed 2026-08-15 that Host Europe offers no fully managed S3
and no API to provision storage. That is a blocking answer, which T02's
acceptance criterion permits alongside evidence and unknown.
- host-europe-cloud-storage: blocked-account-confirmation -> not-offered, with
provenance recorded as account-holder knowledge rather than vendor-written
confirmation. The 2020 published specification describes nothing currently
orderable.
- T02 done: no acceptance requirement is blank for any provider.
- T01 done: the A/B/C comparison was never missing a leg. With no managed S3 to
price, Host Europe's real form is self-managed Garage on their VMs, already
priced from the public catalogue at EUR 335.77/month for 3 nodes — roughly 5x
the chosen Scaleway option, and it fails closed at month 12 when base demand
(458 GB) exceeds the 400 GB usable capacity.
The missing evidence would not have changed the decision; it strengthens it.
The 2026-08-10 due-diligence matrix and the approved optimization case are
deliberately not rewritten. A decision record documents what was known when the
decision was made; the new evidence document is the supersession.
"No provisioning API" is filed as a procurement-facility fact: any Host Europe
resource is manually provisioned, which is RESOURCE-WP-0005 and RAIL-HO-WP-0008
territory, not a pricing question.
RESOURCE-WP-0002 is finished: all seven tasks done. 136 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Publish the operational reference convention (reef: and secret:
handles). Add a resource-control view of reef-railiance that excludes
S3. Open RESOURCE-WP-0006 for the five-facet inventory model.
Implement RESOURCE-WP-0005: entity register, V0.1 terms parameters,
entity association on inventory and planning records, transfer-price
and credit-state arithmetic, monthly settlement, and entity views on
the portfolio report. Live close emits nothing until delivered cost
is known. Handoffs are FIN-WP-0006 and RAILIANCE-WP-0017.
Spawn the operational build as a residual of RESOURCE-WP-0004. Finish
the terms workplan (T01 done; T02–T05 cancelled as superseded) and
point the terms document at the facility tasks.
Publish the baseline profit-center framework for Binky, Frontier,
Railiance, Netkingdom, Helixforge, and Coulomb. Railiance procures and
manages IT resources; other centers settle monthly at cost plus 20%.
Wire INTENT, SCOPE, and the portfolio cadence to the terms, and open
RESOURCE-WP-0004 for schema and settlement adoption.
First delegated evidence from RESOURCE-WP-0003-T04 to land. railiance-platform
delivered apps-pg capacity, utilization, consumers, and the apps-pg-dbbytes-v1
allocation driver, and correctly delivered no EUR.
- data/resources/apps-pg.json: real capacity; allocation unattributed -> shared
under apps-pg-dbbytes-v1; second consumer vergabe-teilnahme registered
- data/control-cycle/apps-pg-2026-09-base.json: first operational control-cycle
record in the repository
- examples/control-cycle/apps-pg-*.json retired; the invented fixture collided
with the real record's identifier
- data/portfolio-coverage-2026-08-14.json: gap marked delivered with three
residual unknowns still open
The real evidence exposed a design gap in the T05 schema: v0.1 required a number
for every cost field, so recording genuine usage without a booked cost meant
inventing one. Schema 0.2 permits null costs, null unattributed_eur, a technical
unattributed_share, and null measurements. Null is unknown, never zero; an
unknown component makes the total null rather than the sum of the known parts;
and the comparator classifies unknown amounts as data_quality instead of
computing a variance. Existing 0.1 records are not rewritten.
apps-pg is now measured (idle at 5.8% of volume) and attributed, and remains
unpriced: delivered technical evidence does not create a booked cost.
86 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
T06: optimization-case schema, fail-closed evaluator, cadence and decision
template. Every option including the baseline must present all ten decision
fields; one unknown blocks the comparison. Validated on the storage case
(Hetzner computes and loses to Scaleway by EUR 29.14/month on operator labour;
Host Europe blocks on four named gaps) and on the non-storage reef-railiance
k3s rightsizing case (low utilization is real, but nothing is costable while
the railiance01 price is unknown).
T07: portfolio report over coverage, lifecycle, utilization, cost, renewals,
risks, open cases, and next actions, derived only from committed evidence.
Portfolio spend is reported null rather than as a partial sum, unattributed
cost is a named list rather than a spread, and unmeasurable resources are
reported rather than dropped.
RESOURCE-WP-0003 is finished; both cases remain blocked_on_evidence against
live delegated records in other repositories. RESOURCE-WP-0002 is untouched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
