Commit graph

10 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
34a014a896 feat: inventory schema 0.3 and close WP-0006 T01 T02 T04
v0.2 records stay valid. v0.3 requires the five facets. Validators
reject inline Scaleway endpoints and secret-looking strings. The
backup record is the first 0.3 object. Reef views already met T02.
2026-08-15 02:40:43 +02:00
10b988fa1c feat(wp-0002): complete T07 — control loop on the live backup resource
The backup is procured and proven, so the loop runs on real evidence.

- data/actuals/2026-08.json: first real observation. database 0.6365 GB,
  stored 0.0066 GB over 8 objects, backup success 1/1, restore RTO 1.08 min.
  Five proxies null, each with a named owner in measurement_gaps.
- data/thresholds/platform-audit-storage.json + tools/thresholds.py: budget
  variance, abnormal growth, stale backup, unused commitment. Fail-closed —
  an unmeasured value is reported as unmeasured, never as within.
- financial_exchange.py gains a usage mode emitting technical_usage records to
  fin-hub, with measurement gaps carried through and no infrastructure amount:
  fin-hub owns the booked fact and a null is never sent as 0.00.
- observation schema 0.2 allows null cost and usage proxies; variance.py fails
  closed rather than reporting a 100% favourable variance on a missing amount.
- platform-audit-storage: ordered -> active, commissioned 2026-08-14, on
  operational fact rather than on the purchase.

The optimization case is now approved by the founder. That needed a schema
change: Host Europe never supplied written terms, so options gained
excluded/exclusion_reason. Previously an unevaluable alternative blocked its
case forever, leaving the record claiming no decision while the bucket was in
production. An excluded option keeps its unknowns and must say what would
bring it back.

August produces no variance and should not: the decision forecast starts at
2026-09, so August is a commissioning baseline. Threshold run is 2 within,
1 not applicable, 6 unmeasured, 0 breaches.

Also fixes a pre-existing test failure: reef-storage consumers_actual is now
rapp-postgres, which the assertion still expected to be empty.

136 tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 20:53:12 +02:00
085c1534e0 feat: complete WP-0002 T05 full restore and PITR
First Backup 48s. Full restore 65s (audit_core 30=30). PITR 65s
after retarget (keep present, destroy absent). Scratch namespace
deleted. Production stayed Ready.
2026-08-14 20:24:30 +02:00
644d5391bd retarget: T04 backup key is resource-control, not Barman
Handle becomes secret:railiance-platform/backup. IAM application is
resource-control; policy and API key are Scoped backup access.
2026-08-14 19:19:56 +02:00
a6ac303d98 feat: order Scaleway backup bucket for WP-0002 T03
Policy now allows Object Storage. Inventory moves proposed -> ordered
with provider_resource_id and reef-storage attribute refs. Cost alert
remains a founder console action; scoped Barman key is T04.
2026-08-14 18:28:27 +02:00
2ebc000f04 docs: approve WP-0002 T03; wait on OpenBao bootstrap key
Human approved the Scaleway buy. Decision and inventory record
approved_on 2026-08-14. Bucket not created until the bootstrap key
is in OpenBao.
2026-08-14 16:58:44 +02:00
f9af7518f5 feat: WP-0002 T03 selection decision, wait on purchase
Recommend Scaleway Multi-AZ nl-ams. Inventory stays proposed with
description, decision, reef: refs, secret: handle, and consumers.
Human approval required before ordered.
2026-08-14 16:18:16 +02:00
f8d1c542d5 feat: operational resource procurement facility
Implement RESOURCE-WP-0005: entity register, V0.1 terms parameters,
entity association on inventory and planning records, transfer-price
and credit-state arithmetic, monthly settlement, and entity views on
the portfolio report. Live close emits nothing until delivered cost
is known. Handoffs are FIN-WP-0006 and RAILIANCE-WP-0017.
2026-08-14 13:15:02 +02:00
17de8b831e feat(portfolio): fold in RAILIANCE-WP-0016 apps-pg evidence
First delegated evidence from RESOURCE-WP-0003-T04 to land. railiance-platform
delivered apps-pg capacity, utilization, consumers, and the apps-pg-dbbytes-v1
allocation driver, and correctly delivered no EUR.

- data/resources/apps-pg.json: real capacity; allocation unattributed -> shared
  under apps-pg-dbbytes-v1; second consumer vergabe-teilnahme registered
- data/control-cycle/apps-pg-2026-09-base.json: first operational control-cycle
  record in the repository
- examples/control-cycle/apps-pg-*.json retired; the invented fixture collided
  with the real record's identifier
- data/portfolio-coverage-2026-08-14.json: gap marked delivered with three
  residual unknowns still open

The real evidence exposed a design gap in the T05 schema: v0.1 required a number
for every cost field, so recording genuine usage without a booked cost meant
inventing one. Schema 0.2 permits null costs, null unattributed_eur, a technical
unattributed_share, and null measurements. Null is unknown, never zero; an
unknown component makes the total null rather than the sum of the known parts;
and the comparator classifies unknown amounts as data_quality instead of
computing a variance. Existing 0.1 records are not rewritten.

apps-pg is now measured (idle at 5.8% of volume) and attributed, and remains
unpriced: delivered technical evidence does not create a booked cost.

86 tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 09:36:57 +02:00
2c2a6073ff feat(portfolio): complete RESOURCE-WP-0003 T06 optimization cases and T07 reporting
T06: optimization-case schema, fail-closed evaluator, cadence and decision
template. Every option including the baseline must present all ten decision
fields; one unknown blocks the comparison. Validated on the storage case
(Hetzner computes and loses to Scaleway by EUR 29.14/month on operator labour;
Host Europe blocks on four named gaps) and on the non-storage reef-railiance
k3s rightsizing case (low utilization is real, but nothing is costable while
the railiance01 price is unknown).

T07: portfolio report over coverage, lifecycle, utilization, cost, renewals,
risks, open cases, and next actions, derived only from committed evidence.
Portfolio spend is reported null rather than as a partial sum, unattributed
cost is a named list rather than a spread, and unmeasurable resources are
reported rather than dropped.

RESOURCE-WP-0003 is finished; both cases remain blocked_on_evidence against
live delegated records in other repositories. RESOURCE-WP-0002 is untouched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 09:28:44 +02:00