First delegated evidence from RESOURCE-WP-0003-T04 to land. railiance-platform delivered apps-pg capacity, utilization, consumers, and the apps-pg-dbbytes-v1 allocation driver, and correctly delivered no EUR. - data/resources/apps-pg.json: real capacity; allocation unattributed -> shared under apps-pg-dbbytes-v1; second consumer vergabe-teilnahme registered - data/control-cycle/apps-pg-2026-09-base.json: first operational control-cycle record in the repository - examples/control-cycle/apps-pg-*.json retired; the invented fixture collided with the real record's identifier - data/portfolio-coverage-2026-08-14.json: gap marked delivered with three residual unknowns still open The real evidence exposed a design gap in the T05 schema: v0.1 required a number for every cost field, so recording genuine usage without a booked cost meant inventing one. Schema 0.2 permits null costs, null unattributed_eur, a technical unattributed_share, and null measurements. Null is unknown, never zero; an unknown component makes the total null rather than the sum of the known parts; and the comparator classifies unknown amounts as data_quality instead of computing a variance. Existing 0.1 records are not rewritten. apps-pg is now measured (idle at 5.8% of volume) and attributed, and remains unpriced: delivered technical evidence does not create a booked cost. 86 tests pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
5.2 KiB
RESOURCE-WP-0003 apps-pg evidence fold-in — 2026-08-14
Result
railiance-platform finished RAILIANCE-WP-0016 and published the apps-pg
evidence that RESOURCE-WP-0003-T04 delegated. This is the first delegated
evidence to land, and folding it in exercised the whole loop end to end:
delegation, delivery, ingestion, allocation, control record, and report.
Source, captured 2026-08-14T00:04:19Z, refreshed with make apps-pg-evidence:
/home/worsch/railiance-platform/docs/evidence/RAILIANCE-WP-0016-apps-pg-observation.json/home/worsch/railiance-platform/docs/evidence/RAILIANCE-WP-0016-apps-pg-resource-evidence.md
What changed here
| Artifact | Change |
|---|---|
data/resources/apps-pg.json |
Real capacity and utilization; allocation moved from unattributed to shared under apps-pg-dbbytes-v1; second consumer vergabe-teilnahme registered; evidence repointed at the platform interface |
data/control-cycle/apps-pg-2026-09-base.json |
New. First operational control-cycle record in the repository |
examples/control-cycle/apps-pg-{forecast,actual}.json |
Retired. The invented fixture collided with the real record's identifier — the clearest possible signal it had been superseded |
schemas/resource-control-cycle.schema.json |
Widened to 0.2: nullable costs, nullable unattributed_eur, new unattributed_share, nullable measurement values |
tools/control_cycle.py |
Unknown amounts return status: "unknown" and classify as data_quality instead of computing a variance |
data/portfolio-coverage-2026-08-14.json |
New. Supersedes the 2026-08-11 observation; the railiance-platform gap is delivered with three residual unknowns |
tools/portfolio_report.py |
Delivered gaps stay visible with their residuals; storage/storage_used added to the measurable pairs |
The schema gap the real evidence exposed
railiance-platform delivered technical facts and, correctly, no EUR — the host
bill belongs to resource:hosteurope:railiance01, whose price is unknown, and
they wrote plainly: "resource-control may convert hours at its own labor rate.
Do not treat these hours as booked cost."
Schema 0.1 could not represent that. Every cost field required a number, so the only way to record real usage was to invent a cost — precisely what this repository refuses to do everywhere else. That is a genuine design gap, found by real evidence rather than by review.
Schema 0.2 permits null for cost components, unattributed_eur, and
measurement values, and adds unattributed_share so a residual can be recorded
from technical evidence alone. null means unknown, never zero; if any
component is unknown the total is null rather than the sum of the known
parts; and the comparator classifies an unknown amount as data_quality,
overriding any explicit attribution, because a missing amount is an evidence
gap and not a price movement.
Existing 0.1 records were not rewritten. schema_version accepts both:
immutability applies to the record, not to the schema.
The first operational record
forecast:apps-pg:2026-09:base:v1 carries what is known and refuses the rest:
| Field | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
consumer_database_gb |
0.0155 GiB | pg_database_size of the two declared consumer databases |
pgdata_gb |
0.5766 GiB | du -sb on PGDATA |
| storage used / provisioned | 0.5766 of 10 GiB | PVC apps-pg-1, local-path |
internal_labor |
EUR 30.00 | 0.5 declared operator-hours at the EUR 60/hour rate already used in data/demand/platform-audit-storage.json |
infrastructure |
null | Share of railiance01; price unknown (RAIL-HO-WP-0008) |
total |
null | One component unknown; not the sum of the known parts |
unattributed_share |
0.948 | WAL and engine catalogs under platform:apps-pg-overhead |
rpo_minutes, rto_minutes |
null | No ScheduledBackup, no restore drill, not an Option A target |
Uncertainty is high and stated in eight notes, including the one that matters
most for allocation: vergabe_db has never recorded a transaction, so its
0.4614 byte share reflects a reserved empty database rather than realised
demand. The method is recorded as delivered; whether it survives contact with a
second month is a question for the quarterly calibration.
Effect on the portfolio report
- apps-pg leaves
utilization.unmeasuredand entersutilization.idleat 5.8 percent of its volume — a third idle resource alongside railiance01 and the k3s cluster. - apps-pg leaves
cost.unattributed_allocation, which drops from four resources to three. - apps-pg remains in
cost.unpriced, andknown_monthly_spend_eurremainsnull. Delivered technical evidence does not create a booked cost. - The railiance-platform gap moves to
delivered_gapsand still generates three next actions from its residual unknowns.
Boundary held
No booked cost was originated here. The labour figure is a conversion of
declared hours at a rate this repository already publishes, recorded as an
estimate with its basis, not as a ledger fact. Recovery risk was recorded, not
resolved: apps-pg has RPO unbounded and RTO undefined on single-host local-path
storage, which stays railiance-platform's to close and is gated on the same
object-store decision as RESOURCE-WP-0002.