Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
repo-manager
96d06e320a chore(registrar): assign State Hub identifiers
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2583210@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: f2bff2d5-e9b2-4338-92ca-10282a927006
2026-08-25 17:48:24 +02:00
02a17e601d Record all three rulings; RISK-WP-0003 finished
Escalation rule adopted as written. RISK-F-0008 accepted with the legal
policy set as the compensating control. Canon kinds packet sent to
the-custodian, with note offered lifecycle-free and verifications
deliberately withheld as an unsettled species.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-20 23:37:45 +02:00
9a22a2adc5 RISK-WP-0003: three of four tasks done, T01 waiting on the trigger-list ruling
Workplan status blocked rather than active: the only remaining task is a
custodian decision, and calling that 'active' would be the register
claiming progress it is not making.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-20 23:17:31 +02:00
aeb56e3711 RISK-WP-0003 T02/T03: state the retention periods, and write the intake route
T02 applies the dependency rule to this repo's own work: rather than wait
on audit-core's co-residency horizon, RISK-REG-0001 now states target
periods per category with the reasoning — 12 months for operator and
agent security records, 3 years to year-end for counterparty transaction
evidence, 8 years for accounting vouchers (shortened by BEG IV, flagged
as worth confirming), 10 years for books, 6 for commercial letters,
delete for anything with no ground. Targets, not achievements: the estate
cannot demonstrate any of them while the real horizon is the maximum
across every co-resident on platform-pg, and that gap is stated so the
table cannot be read as a compliance claim.

T03 writes the intake route from what audit-core did correctly without
one: the question as a question, what already depends on it, what becomes
expensive if the answer is no, and what you are not asking for.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-20 23:16:51 +02:00
a798a4c771 Draft RISK-WP-0002, RISK-WP-0003, RISK-WP-0004
Publication handover (two findings ready, three tasks, one of which is a
paragraph); regulatory intake as a working remit rather than one record,
carrying RISK-REG-0001's open items; and running the register, where
every task traces to something that actually went wrong in week one —
grading before reading the inbox, a status the tooling did not know, an
id collision, two gradings resting on file comparison because a token
expired, and an on-request path nobody has walked.

All three are status: proposed. The custodian decides which become active
and in what order.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-20 08:07:06 +02:00