activity-core corrected us: it governs Temporal schedule overlap, not per-message suppression, and there is no dedupe at the sink — so an unread message re-emits hourly until read. Removed the field rather than leave it implying a guarantee it does not give, and kept the repetition deliberately: an hourly line in the progress log is a cheap price for the failure this exists to prevent, and it stops when somebody reads. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.6 KiB
| id | name | type | version | enabled | owner | governance | status | created | updated | trigger | context_sources | report_sinks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hourly-register-inbox-watch | Hourly Register Inbox Watch | activity-definition | 1.0 | true | risk-nexus | custodian | active | 2026-08-20 | 2026-08-20 |
|
|
|
Hourly Register Inbox Watch
Runs hourly at :05 Berlin time. Fires only when something is actually waiting.
Why hourly, and why the inbox specifically
docs/method/review.md sets an adaptive cadence whose shortest rung is one
hour, so hourly is the finest granularity the register can act on. Anything
faster would report work that cannot yet be due.
The inbox is the trigger rather than the clock because of what happened on
2026-08-19: this register graded RISK-F-0001 critical and prepared an
escalation while two messages sat unread — one narrowing the exposure, one
reporting the fix. Both changed the grade. Reading the inbox is now question
zero of every check (docs/method/check-procedure.md), and this activity is
the mechanism that stops it depending on somebody remembering.
An unread message addressed to risk-nexus is, by construction, a claim that
something in the register may have moved.
It will repeat, and that is the deliberate choice
activity-core corrected us on 2026-08-20: dedupe_key_strategy governs
Temporal schedule overlap, not per-message suppression, and cron workflow ids
include scheduled_for — so an unread message re-emits an instruction every
hour until it is read. There is no dedupe at the sink either.
We removed the field rather than leave it there implying a guarantee it does not give.
The repetition is kept, on purpose. An unread message addressed to this
register is a claim that something in it may have moved, and the failure this
activity exists to prevent — grading RISK-F-0001 critical while its fix
notice sat unread — cost a wrong grade and a nearly-sent escalation. An hourly
line in the progress log is a cheap price for that, and it stops the moment
somebody reads the message.
Reading a message includes marking it read. That is what clears the nag, and it is part of question zero rather than a courtesy.
If this ever becomes real noise — an unattended weekend, a message nobody can
action — the fix activity-core named is a stable completion key gating the
rule, not a longer interval. A longer interval would trade a visible cost for
an invisible one.
What it does not do
It does not grade, close, publish or escalate anything. Severity, disclosure and escalation are judgements this repo makes with a human or an agent session doing the reading — never a cron. This activity's entire job is to make sure somebody looks.
id: inbox-has-spoken
for_each: context.inbox
bind_as: message
condition: 'context.message.read_at == None'
action:
task_template: 'risk-nexus: read {context.message.from_agent} before checking'
description: >-
Unread message to risk-nexus from {context.message.from_agent}:
"{context.message.subject}". Read it before any check or grading — this is
question zero in docs/method/check-procedure.md. Then run `make due` in
risk-nexus and work the list, recording each outcome with
`make checked ARGS="<finding-id> clean|moved"`.
target_repo: risk-nexus
priority: high
labels: ["risk-register", "inbox", "question-zero"]