RISK-REG-0001: eight-year voucher period (BEG IV) confirmed against secondary sources and §147 AO. RISK-POL-0009/0002: positions unchanged; new restore evidence noted as partial. RISK-POL-0012: receiving duty still unowned; issuing phase-in dates added, flagged for confirmation. RISK-POL-0011: stays dormant. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 6903@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8319e8a8-ffa6-4eb3-b8bf-b29945628f89
2.8 KiB
| id | type | title | regime | status | activates_when | owner | written | cadence | clean_streak | last_checked | next_check | checked_by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RISK-POL-0011 | legal-policy | Accessibility of digital services | BFSG (European Accessibility Act, Directive 2019/882), EN 301 549 / WCAG | dormant | a consumer-facing digital service or product is offered in Germany — e-commerce, banking, e-books, ticketing, or a consumer app | risk-nexus | 2026-08-20 | 1h | 1 | 2026-09-22T06:26:29Z | 2026-09-22T07:26:29Z | worsch |
RISK-POL-0011 — accessibility
Dormant, and the most likely of the dormant set to activate. The estate has a consumer domain and design work in it; the day any of that is offered to consumers in Germany, this applies in full and without a grace period for new services.
Why it is written before it is needed
Accessibility cannot be retrofitted cheaply. It constrains component choice, colour, focus handling, form semantics and content structure — decisions taken early and expensively reversed. A policy retrieved at launch is a rebuild; a policy read at design time is a constraint like any other.
That is the whole argument for this catalogue existing, and this is the entry that demonstrates it.
What it requires, in outline
- Conformance to the harmonised standard (EN 301 549, which carries WCAG at level AA) for the service's interface, and for its documentation and support.
- An accessibility statement, published, saying what conforms and what does not.
- Accessibility considered in the product's own conformity assessment, with records kept.
Micro-enterprises providing services are outside scope, which is a real exemption and also a fragile one to build on — it disappears with headcount or turnover, and the product does not become accessible by growing.
What it requires of systems
Design-time, not launch-time: semantic markup, keyboard operability, contrast and focus visibility, form labelling and error identification, no information-by-colour-alone, captions and alternatives for media. Plus a way to test these that runs before release rather than at it.
Evidence that would show this is met
A conformance assessment against EN 301 549; a published accessibility statement; automated and manual test results in the release path.
Nothing here binds any repo today. whynot-design and the consumer-domain
repos are where it will land, and naming the owner is theirs, not the
register's.
2026-09-22 review. The policy stays dormant. No consumer-facing digital service offered in Germany is on record. The micro-enterprise exemption for services is still the fragile basis described above.
Reviews
- 2026-09-22 — clean check: Dormant: no consumer-facing service on record. Cadence instant → 1h (1 clean in a row); next check 2026-09-22 07:26Z.