coulomb/secrets-engine
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

docs: record catalog lane review
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
Details
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 1s
Details

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-21 08:54:44 +02:00
parent 784be978bf
commit 398955295b
2 changed files with 12 additions and 7 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
WORK-RECORDS.md
View file

@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
| task | SECRETS-WP-0005-T07 | done | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0005-scope-intent-value-gaps.md |
| task | SECRETS-WP-0006-T01 | done | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md |
| task | SECRETS-WP-0006-T02 | done | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md |
| task | SECRETS-WP-0006-T03 | progress | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md |
| task | SECRETS-WP-0006-T03 | done | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md |
| task | SECRETS-WP-0006-T04 | done | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md |
| task | SECRETS-WP-0006-T05 | wait | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md |
| task | SECRETS-WP-0006-T06 | wait | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md |

17
workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md
View file

@ -125,16 +125,21 @@ Acceptance:
```task
id: SECRETS-WP-0006-T03
status: progress
status: done
priority: high
```
Progress 2026-08-21: the offered contribution did not arrive, so drafted all
Completed 2026-08-21. The offered contribution did not arrive, so drafted all
five entries from ops-warden playbooks and the authoritative railiance-platform
CCRs. Sent message `ceace632-2332-46d8-a2b3-1714fbfa7e2c` requesting line-by-line
confirmation of coordinates, fields, consumers, lifecycle owners, and proposed
native delivery. T03 remains progress until that review returns; interim proxy
ownership is unchanged.
CCRs, then requested line-by-line review in message
`ceace632-2332-46d8-a2b3-1714fbfa7e2c`. Ops-warden confirmed the mounts, paths,
field sets, CCR references, consumers, lifecycle owners, existing workload
delivery, proposed exact-path AppRole surface, both route rejections, and the
delivery-mode correction in messages `26df37c5-2756-49b8-8f9c-c1bb2bab1b4b`
and `3f875d90-6f88-4f44-961b-6f6fbd15b01d`. The follow-up retracted the only
apparent metadata concern: `REUSE_SURFACE_FORGEJO_WEBHOOK_SECRET` is explicitly
present in CCR-2026-0005, so both reuse-surface and issue-core remain correctly
classified `high`. Interim proxy ownership remains unchanged until T05.
Review ops-warden's proposed entries line by line against the schema, canonical
security boundary, live route metadata, and owning workload documentation.