secrets-engine/docs/service-auth.md
tegwick 70371649af
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 1s
Harden production authorization and service auth
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-5.6-sol
Assistant-Session: 01a0217e-8c4c-7383-be6b-f50a6e485306
2026-08-23 14:15:42 +02:00

1.5 KiB

KeyCape service-auth consumer boundary

secrets-engine now implements the consumer half of KeyCape's accepted secrets-engine-openbao service-auth contract. It performs one explicit HTTPS client_credentials exchange, keeps the resulting JWT in memory, and validates the non-cryptographic contract before any future OpenBao login:

  • subject service:secrets-engine, audience/client secrets-engine-openbao;
  • service principal in tenant:coulomb, role secrets-engine;
  • exact openbao:login scope and KeyCape AAL1 client-secret assurance;
  • RS256 declaration, bounded issue/expiry timestamps, maximum 15-minute life, and renewal when no more than three minutes remain;
  • no ID token, refresh token, implicit retry provider, or fallback identity.

The confidential-client secret must be an explicitly selected mode-0600 file outside every Git worktree. It is sent with HTTP Basic authentication and never placed in a request body, command argument, evidence record, or object representation.

This is a scaffold, not a live OpenBao authentication path. JWT payload parsing does not prove a signature. railiance-platform still owns the exact OpenBao JWT auth mount/role, issuer keys, claim bindings, token policy, TTL/use limits, and cryptographic verification. Until that contract is materialized, the provider is not selected by the CLI and bootstrap/AppRole behavior is not used as an implicit fallback.

Canonical provider contract: key-cape/docs/openbao-service-auth-contract.md (reviewed 2026-08-23).