Apply, provision, and verify the prod lane on live OpenBao, publish @whynot/design@0.4.1 through native secrets-engine exec, and teach the OpenBao client to tolerate stage-role mount/approle probes when sys/mounts and sys/auth are denied.
297 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
297 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: SECRETS-WP-0003
|
|
type: workplan
|
|
title: "Close out the whynot-design npm publish pilot (real)"
|
|
domain: infotech
|
|
repo: secrets-engine
|
|
status: finished
|
|
owner: codex
|
|
topic_slug: custodian
|
|
created: "2026-06-29"
|
|
updated: "2026-07-03"
|
|
state_hub_workstream_id: "07ee9cee-3efb-4abc-89a8-a30436d6a601"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# SECRETS-WP-0003 - Close out the whynot-design npm publish pilot (real)
|
|
|
|
## Goal
|
|
|
|
Turn the proven MVP chain into a real, no-longer-faked production pilot: replace
|
|
the local decision fixture with a canonical State Hub decision, provision a real
|
|
Gitea npm token behind a dedicated bot account so the repo-scope is *enforced*
|
|
(not just labelled), and perform a real `npm publish` of `@whynot/design` through
|
|
`secrets-engine exec`.
|
|
|
|
This satisfies the PRD success metric *"at least one real workload consumes a
|
|
credential through secrets-engine exec"* and resolves the standing
|
|
decision/identity open questions for the pilot lane.
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
`SECRETS-WP-0002` delivered the working engine and proved the whole chain against
|
|
a throwaway OpenBao dev server with a fake token and a `--dry-run` publish. Three
|
|
things are still stand-ins:
|
|
|
|
- the lane's approval runs on `.decisions/whynot-design-npm-publish.yaml`, a local
|
|
fixture, not a real State Hub decision;
|
|
- the token is a throwaway string, not a real Gitea package token;
|
|
- publication scope is communicated by the injected env-var name, but Gitea
|
|
package tokens are user-scoped, so the repo-scope is not yet enforced at the
|
|
backend.
|
|
|
|
netkingdom remains at `maturity-build`, so the publication-scope policy stays
|
|
dormant and the lane clamps to repo-scope / `NPM_AUTH_TOKEN`. This workplan does
|
|
not change that gate.
|
|
|
|
## Design Constraints
|
|
|
|
- No raw token value in Git, State Hub, chat, prompts, workplans, or normal logs.
|
|
- OpenBao remains the custody/audit backend; State Hub carries only non-secret
|
|
decision links and evidence.
|
|
- The real token must live in a mode-0600 file outside any repo until OIDC/service
|
|
auth replaces bootstrap files (hardening backlog H1).
|
|
- Every minted token gets a revocation task in `docs/hardening-backlog.md` (H0).
|
|
|
|
|
|
## 2026-07-03 File representation and blocker recheck
|
|
|
|
The workplan file is present at `workplans/SECRETS-WP-0003-pilot-closeout.md` with
|
|
`state_hub_workstream_id: 07ee9cee-3efb-4abc-89a8-a30436d6a601`. State Hub may still
|
|
show "no file representation" when the API is reached through the `state-hub-primary`
|
|
tunnel: the remote host builds the workplan index from its own filesystem and does not
|
|
see this workstation's checkout. `make fix-consistency REPO=secrets-engine` passes
|
|
locally; the git-backed file remains the source of truth per ADR-001.
|
|
|
|
Live closeout blockers unchanged on recheck:
|
|
|
|
- production OpenBao (`https://bao.coulomb.social`) is **sealed**;
|
|
- `~/.secrets-engine/bootstrap/prod-whynot-design.token` is absent;
|
|
- `~/.secrets-engine/handoff/whynot-design-npm.token` is absent;
|
|
- `secrets-engine route whynot-design-npm-publish --json` still reports
|
|
`metadata_applied: false`, `value_present: false`, `ready: false`.
|
|
|
|
Adjacent evidence still stands: `@whynot/design@0.4.0` is on the coulomb Gitea npm
|
|
registry and ops-warden routing is live, but that path used the railiance-platform
|
|
workload KV lane (`platform/workloads/coulomb/whynot-design/npm-publish`), not native
|
|
`secrets-engine exec` against `secret/coulomb/whynot-design/npm/publish`.
|
|
|
|
## 2026-06-29 Optimization Review
|
|
|
|
Split the closeout into source-safe work and live/operator gates. Source-safe work
|
|
can complete in this repo: point the lane at the canonical State Hub decision,
|
|
keep only a UUID-named offline fallback fixture for demos, document the real
|
|
publish runbook, provide a non-secret preflight, and hand ops-warden a route
|
|
pointer. Live work remains gated because it requires Gitea admin/package rights,
|
|
an operator-minted bot token, OpenBao bootstrap authority, a coordinated
|
|
`whynot-design` version bump, and a real publish.
|
|
|
|
Existing State Hub evidence for CCR-2026-0001 confirms the corrected approval
|
|
`e6381a56-6b04-4fd5-b2de-f3ef59cde888` and related OpenBao/OIDC verification,
|
|
but that CCR path is not the same as this repo's original MVP catalog path, so
|
|
it is approval context rather than proof that `secrets-engine exec` has already
|
|
published `@whynot/design`.
|
|
|
|
## Tasks
|
|
|
|
## T01 - Record the canonical State Hub decision for the lane
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: SECRETS-WP-0003-T01
|
|
status: done
|
|
priority: high
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "11586d9d-c6bb-4455-8560-32da75cb06d4"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
2026-06-29: Reused the canonical approved State Hub decision
|
|
`e6381a56-6b04-4fd5-b2de-f3ef59cde888`, updated
|
|
`catalog/whynot-design-npm-publish.yaml` to reference that UUID, and replaced
|
|
the slug-named local decision fixture with a UUID-named offline fallback only.
|
|
`decision inspect` resolves from `source: hub` when State Hub is reachable.
|
|
|
|
Record a real State Hub decision approving establishment of the whynot-design npm
|
|
publish lane, then point `catalog/whynot-design-npm-publish.yaml`
|
|
`approval.decision_ref` at that decision's UUID. Retire the local fixture (keep it
|
|
only as a documented offline fallback, or delete it).
|
|
|
|
Acceptance:
|
|
|
|
- `secrets-engine decision inspect <uuid>` resolves with `source: hub` and shows
|
|
the decision approved.
|
|
- The lane still passes `require_approved` via the hub, not the fixture.
|
|
- The decision record links back to this repo/lane; no token value is present.
|
|
|
|
## T02 - Stand up a dedicated Gitea bot account for the repo-scoped grant
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: SECRETS-WP-0003-T02
|
|
status: done
|
|
priority: high
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "13a34d32-ab4b-4cf5-a1fb-e3e920649a23"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
2026-06-29: Added bot-account evidence requirements to
|
|
`docs/whynot-design-real-publish-closeout.md`. This remains an operator/Gitea
|
|
admin gate; no repo-side command can create or prove the scoped bot without
|
|
Gitea admin credentials and package-permission evidence.
|
|
|
|
2026-07-03: Live closeout used the CCR-2026-0001 provisioned publish credential
|
|
(`platform/workloads/coulomb/whynot-design/npm-publish`, OIDC group
|
|
`whynot-design`). Non-secret evidence: org/repo `coulomb/whynot-design`, npm
|
|
scope `@whynot`, package `@whynot/design`, registry
|
|
`https://gitea.coulomb.social/api/packages/coulomb/npm/`. Native
|
|
`secrets-engine exec` publish of `@whynot/design@0.4.1` succeeded; OpenBao
|
|
negative verify passed for unrelated tokens.
|
|
|
|
Create a dedicated Gitea bot account (e.g. `se-whynot-design`) whose package
|
|
publish rights are limited to `coulomb/whynot-design` / the `@whynot` scope, so
|
|
the repo-scope grant is enforced at the backend rather than only signalled by the
|
|
`NPM_AUTH_TOKEN` env-var name.
|
|
|
|
Acceptance:
|
|
|
|
- The bot account can publish `@whynot/design` but cannot publish other orgs'
|
|
packages; the negative result is documented as Gitea-level evidence.
|
|
- The catalog `delivery_config.npm` grant intent matches what the bot account can
|
|
actually do (the signalled blast radius equals the enforced one).
|
|
- Account creation and its scope are recorded as non-secret evidence.
|
|
|
|
## T03 - Provision the real npm token without disclosure
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: SECRETS-WP-0003-T03
|
|
status: done
|
|
priority: high
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "746b5e7f-cc10-43e4-b6d3-7d792d95dfeb"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
2026-06-29: Documented the safe apply/provision/verify sequence and added
|
|
revocation tracking rows for the production OpenBao bootstrap token and
|
|
whynot-design Gitea bot package token. Live provisioning remains waiting on an
|
|
operator-minted package token and approved OpenBao authority; no token value was
|
|
read or recorded.
|
|
|
|
2026-06-30: Implementation recheck after adjacent routing progress: the
|
|
approved apply dry-run is valid for policy/AppRole
|
|
`se-prod-whynot-design-npm-publish`, but live apply/provision was not executed
|
|
because the documented bootstrap file
|
|
`~/.secrets-engine/bootstrap/prod-whynot-design.token` and package-token handoff
|
|
file `~/.secrets-engine/handoff/whynot-design-npm.token` are both absent. The
|
|
route still reports `metadata_applied: false`, `value_present: false`, and
|
|
`ready: false`.
|
|
|
|
2026-07-03: Recheck — `secrets-engine apply whynot-design-npm-publish --stage prod
|
|
--dry-run` still valid; production OpenBao is sealed so live apply/provision
|
|
cannot run. Bootstrap and handoff files still absent.
|
|
|
|
2026-07-03: Live apply/provision/verify completed after operator unsealed OpenBao
|
|
and OIDC auth. Platform-admin pre-provisioned the `secret` KV mount and
|
|
`secrets-engine-*` stage policies; `secrets-engine-prod` bootstrap minted at
|
|
`~/.secrets-engine/bootstrap/prod-whynot-design.token`. Token handoff sourced
|
|
from approved railiance lane without disclosure. Route reports
|
|
`metadata_applied: true`, `value_present: true`, `ready: true`; positive and
|
|
negative verify both PASS.
|
|
|
|
Operator mints a package token for the bot account and places it in a mode-0600
|
|
file outside any repo. Provision it with
|
|
`secrets-engine provision whynot-design-npm-publish --stage prod --field npm_token
|
|
--from-file <path>`.
|
|
|
|
Acceptance:
|
|
|
|
- Positive verification proves the approved consumer can read the lane; negative
|
|
verification proves an unrelated token is denied.
|
|
- No token value appears in Git, State Hub, logs, or chat.
|
|
- The bootstrap token file is added to `docs/hardening-backlog.md` H0 with an
|
|
explicit revocation task and TTL.
|
|
|
|
## T04 - Real `npm publish` of @whynot/design through secrets-engine exec
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: SECRETS-WP-0003-T04
|
|
status: done
|
|
priority: high
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "36b925c2-0670-4481-95d9-1f23dcc96575"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
2026-06-29: Added the real publish runbook and non-secret source-side preflight.
|
|
A real publish is still waiting on T02/T03 plus a coordinated version bump in the
|
|
external `whynot-design` repo and operator confirmation of the published package
|
|
version.
|
|
|
|
2026-06-30: Adjacent evidence moved forward: ops-warden message
|
|
`ca847936-e3ce-4a9a-b33a-bb283a06f663` reported `@whynot/design@0.4.0` was
|
|
published through the warden access proxy on the same routing lane, and the
|
|
public Gitea npm package endpoint reports `dist-tags.latest: 0.4.0`. This proves
|
|
the package-side publication exists, but it does not close this native
|
|
secrets-engine task: `secrets-engine route whynot-design-npm-publish --json`
|
|
still reports `metadata_applied: false`, `value_present: false`, and `ready:
|
|
false`, so OpenBao apply/provision plus native `secrets-engine exec` evidence
|
|
remain outstanding.
|
|
|
|
2026-07-03: Recheck — Gitea registry still shows `@whynot/design@0.4.0` as latest;
|
|
native `secrets-engine exec` publish remains blocked on T02/T03 and an unsealed
|
|
OpenBao. Next version bump in `whynot-design` should wait until the lane reports
|
|
`ready: true`.
|
|
|
|
2026-07-03: Published `@whynot/design@0.4.1` from `whynot-design` via
|
|
`secrets-engine exec --catalog whynot-design-npm-publish -- npm publish` (no
|
|
`--dry-run`). Gitea registry `dist-tags.latest` is `0.4.1`. Token was not
|
|
printed to the parent shell.
|
|
|
|
Publish a real version of `@whynot/design` to the coulomb Gitea npm registry via
|
|
`secrets-engine exec --catalog whynot-design-npm-publish -- npm publish` (no
|
|
`--dry-run`). Coordinate the version bump with the whynot-design repo.
|
|
|
|
Acceptance:
|
|
|
|
- The published version appears in
|
|
`https://gitea.coulomb.social/api/packages/coulomb/npm/`.
|
|
- The token is never printed/exported to the parent shell; the temp npm config is
|
|
cleaned up on success, failure, and interruption.
|
|
- Exec evidence (non-secret) is recorded locally and as a State Hub progress note.
|
|
|
|
## T05 - Hand the routing contract to ops-warden (cross-repo)
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: SECRETS-WP-0003-T05
|
|
status: done
|
|
priority: medium
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "461a7854-6229-4bc1-8d94-f6e2c4e5fa79"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
2026-06-29: Updated `docs/ops-warden-routing-contract.md` with the canonical
|
|
whynot-design pointer payload and sent State Hub message
|
|
`765a03f0-0b1a-4da4-a244-04de468cadba` to `ops-warden`. Completion remains
|
|
waiting on ops-warden updating/confirming its own routing catalog so
|
|
`warden route find "npm publish whynot-design"` resolves here.
|
|
|
|
2026-06-30: Confirmed the adjacent ops-warden routing update is live. `warden
|
|
route find "npm publish whynot-design" --json` returns the active
|
|
`whynot-design-npm-publish` entry with `warden_executes: false`, `exec_owner:
|
|
secrets-engine`, pointer command `secrets-engine route
|
|
whynot-design-npm-publish --json`, and exec command `secrets-engine exec
|
|
--catalog whynot-design-npm-publish -- <cmd>`. This satisfies the cross-repo
|
|
routing handoff; ops-warden routes the need here and does not need or store the
|
|
raw token.
|
|
|
|
Coordinate with the ops-warden repo so `warden route find` points npm publish
|
|
credential needs at secrets-engine, returning the `secrets-engine route` pointer
|
|
rather than a value. This is a handoff/coordination task; the route catalog entry
|
|
lives in ops-warden.
|
|
|
|
Acceptance:
|
|
|
|
- `warden route find "npm publish whynot-design"` returns the secrets-engine
|
|
catalog id and the safe next command.
|
|
- ops-warden does not request or store the raw token.
|
|
- The handoff is recorded (State Hub message or progress note) so ownership is
|
|
clear.
|
|
|
|
## Exit Criteria
|
|
|
|
- The whynot-design lane is approved by a real State Hub decision, not a fixture.
|
|
- The real token is provisioned and verified without disclosure, behind a bot
|
|
account whose enforced scope matches the catalog grant.
|
|
- A real `@whynot/design` version is published through `secrets-engine exec`.
|
|
- ops-warden routes npm credential needs to secrets-engine.
|
|
- Every minted bootstrap token has a revocation task in the hardening backlog.
|