44b97e3c48
correlation_id: 6045c4c5-4c9b-4588-8cef-78f2cd66f3c0 reason: Request own-voice layer declaration under §11 source: repo-manager Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9
38 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
# Intake records
|
|
|
|
## SECRETS-IN-0001 — Declaration requested: state this repository's layer in INTENT.md (security layer model §11)
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
id: SECRETS-IN-0001
|
|
kind: intake
|
|
title: 'Declaration requested: state this repository''s layer in INTENT.md (security
|
|
layer model §11)'
|
|
status: open
|
|
origin: cross-repo
|
|
origin_ref: net-kingdom security-layer-model_v0.4 §11
|
|
priority: low
|
|
owner: secrets-engine
|
|
requested_by: gate-house
|
|
proposed_layer: Engine
|
|
description: 'A conformance sweep on 2026-08-28 found this repository has no layer
|
|
declaration of its own. It carries a layering review note gate-house wrote into
|
|
the top of its INTENT.md on 2026-08-24, and that note names a layer — but the words
|
|
are gate-house''s, sitting above a line admitting the body is unadapted. Section
|
|
11 has since been amended to say so explicitly: a layer stated about a repository
|
|
by another repository is not a declaration; only the repository''s own file, in
|
|
its own voice, conforms. Seven of fifteen estate-authored repositories have declared;
|
|
this is one of the eight that have not, and the standard does not claim adoption
|
|
on the basis of notes gate-house wrote. REQUESTED: state the layer in INTENT.md
|
|
in your own voice, or contest it. PROPOSED LAYER: Engine. Credential abstraction,
|
|
custody, lifecycle. Two boundaries worth stating in your words: the decision that
|
|
authority exists is access-engine''s, and the doctrine governing when authority
|
|
may be materialized is gate-house''s. Also relevant: ops-warden has declared its
|
|
SSH-CA signing write to OpenBao as an engine gap with intended owner secrets-engine,
|
|
blocked on ''no engine exposes an SSH-CA surface''. You may want to contest or accept
|
|
that intended ownership. Contesting is a real option and costs nothing — the three
|
|
repositories that reviewed this model each returned a correction, two of which changed
|
|
the standard. If the proposed layer is wrong for what this repository actually does,
|
|
that is more useful to us than a label added to close a checkbox. Standard: net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.4.md.'
|
|
created: '2026-08-28T21:02:14.320087Z'
|
|
updated: '2026-08-28T21:02:14.320087Z'
|
|
```
|