secrets-engine/workplans/SECRETS-WP-0004-warden-sign-token-lane.md
tegwick 11c5bd73ba chore(consistency): sync task status from DB [auto]
Updated by fix-consistency on 2026-06-29:
  - SECRETS-WP-0004-T04: progress → wait
2026-06-29 19:07:36 +02:00

204 lines
8.4 KiB
Markdown

---
id: SECRETS-WP-0004
type: workplan
title: "Provision a scoped warden-sign token lane (ops-warden / FLEX-WP-0007 T4)"
domain: infotech
repo: secrets-engine
status: active
owner: codex
topic_slug: custodian
created: "2026-06-29"
updated: "2026-06-29"
state_hub_workstream_id: "eb1bdff7-909c-4391-8b95-6baf1feb3a54"
---
# SECRETS-WP-0004 - Provision a scoped warden-sign token lane
## Goal
Give ops-warden a scoped OpenBao credential that can run `warden sign` over the
HTTP API, minted and custodied by secrets-engine. Model it as a first-class
secrets-engine **auth-capability lane** (an OpenBao policy + AppRole granting a
narrow capability), not a KV value. Post the non-secret pointers to State Hub and
hand the token/secret_id to the operator out-of-band.
This unblocks FLEX-WP-0007 T4 (the joint OpenBao + policy-gate production smoke),
after which `policy.enabled: true` can go live on CoulombCore.
## Context
ops-warden raised this on State Hub (msg 077ac90d, 2026-06-28). warden's vault
backend signs over the HTTP API (`X-Vault-Token`) and holds no standing OpenBao
token (conduit-not-broker), so token custody/minting is squarely secrets-engine's
lane. The operator cannot mint one interactively: the `bao` CLI is not installed
on CoulombCore and `bao login -method=oidc` is therefore unavailable — hence the
preference for an AppRole the operator can use non-interactively.
Target backend is the **production** OpenBao at `https://bao.coulomb.social`,
mount `ssh`. Actors in scope: `agt-state-hub-bridge` (primary),
`agt-codex-interhub-bootstrap`, `adm-example`, `atm-backup-daily`. The signing
roles are `agt-role`, `adm-role`, `atm-role`.
This is the first non-KV, non-npm lane and the first lane that touches production
OpenBao, so it also exercises parts of the engine the npm pilot did not.
## Design Constraints
- No token value or AppRole `secret_id` in Git, State Hub, chat, prompts,
workplans, or normal logs — pointers only on the hub, value out-of-band.
- The `warden-sign` policy must be narrow: `update` on `ssh/sign/<role>` for the
allowlisted roles only. No broader `ssh/*`, no `sys/`, `auth/token/`,
`identity/`, no root/sudo.
- Production apply uses a mode-0600 bootstrap token outside any repo, revocable,
recorded in `docs/hardening-backlog.md` H0.
- ops-warden takes no custody; secrets-engine owns minting and revocation.
## Tasks
## T01 - Extend the catalog for auth-capability (non-KV) lanes
```task
id: SECRETS-WP-0004-T01
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "278e9a20-eaa6-47a8-9dd7-62952961d520"
```
2026-06-29: Implemented `kind: auth-capability` catalog support, fieldless
non-KV validation, KV provisioning bypass/rejection, route semantics, and dry-run
plan/apply handling while preserving the existing KV/npm lane behavior.
Add a lane kind that represents an OpenBao auth credential (AppRole + policy)
granting a capability on a mount, rather than a KV value. The current schema
assumes a KV `mount/path/fields` value and `provision --from-file`; an
auth-capability lane has no stored value — the deliverable is the minted token /
`secret_id`.
Acceptance:
- The schema validates a `warden-sign` auth-capability lane (kind explicit).
- KV-only assumptions (`kv_data_path`, from-file provisioning, value verification)
are bypassed for this kind without weakening the npm KV path.
- `plan`/`apply` produce a policy + AppRole for the lane.
## T02 - Define the warden-sign policy and AppRole
```task
id: SECRETS-WP-0004-T02
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "f4b209e5-c900-4f5e-bb0c-f0c5b27b70c2"
```
2026-06-29: Added `catalog/warden-sign.yaml`, exact `warden-sign` policy/AppRole
planning, guard coverage rejecting broad `ssh/*`, `sys/`, `auth/token/`,
`identity/`, wildcard, root-like, and non-`update` grants, plus tests for the
allowlist and denial probes. Production stage policy now has exact
`warden-sign` policy/AppRole management exceptions only.
Author the `warden-sign` ACL policy and AppRole. Policy: `update` on
`ssh/sign/agt-role` (plus `adm-role`, `atm-role`) on the `ssh` mount; nothing
else. AppRole `warden-sign` bound to that policy with a short token TTL, usable
non-interactively via `role_id` + `secret_id` (no `bao` CLI needed).
Acceptance:
- The policy lists exact allowed/denied paths; the guards in `roles.py` refuse any
broader variant (`ssh/*`, `sys/`, `auth/token/`, `identity/`, wildcards, root).
- Negative check: a token from this AppRole can `sign` only the allowlisted roles
and is denied elsewhere on the `ssh` mount.
- The AppRole issues a scoped token carrying only the sign capability.
## T03 - Apply against production OpenBao via bootstrap token
```task
id: SECRETS-WP-0004-T03
status: wait
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "4b414788-d670-496b-9c57-074464a012c4"
```
2026-06-29: Source apply path is implemented and dry-run verified. Live apply is
waiting on an approved SECRETS-WP-0004 decision/workplan gate plus a mode-0600
production bootstrap token outside any repo. The pending token path/revocation
row is recorded in `docs/hardening-backlog.md` H0.
Apply the policy + AppRole on `https://bao.coulomb.social` using a mode-0600
bootstrap token stored outside any repo. Idempotent re-apply.
Acceptance:
- The `warden-sign` policy and AppRole exist on the production OpenBao.
- The bootstrap token file is recorded in `docs/hardening-backlog.md` H0 with an
explicit revocation task and TTL.
- Apply evidence is non-secret (policy/role names, mount, addr, status — no value).
## T04 - Out-of-band handoff and non-secret pointers
```task
id: SECRETS-WP-0004-T04
status: wait
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "52b5cf88-029f-4f4b-8fe9-0a8dc30378b5"
```
2026-06-29: Added `secrets-engine handoff` and
`docs/warden-sign-auth-capability.md`. Handoff writes `role_id` and a fresh
single-use `secret_id` to caller-chosen mode-0600 files outside Git worktrees and
records only non-secret file paths/TTL metadata. Execution is waiting on live
apply and attended out-of-band operator delivery.
2026-06-29: ops-warden follow-up message `f5b276a3-b90f-454f-b883-83eee7c69616`
asked for the OIDC login pointer instead of AppRole handoff because Bernd can
mint the scoped token on his workstation. Added the non-secret pointer:
`bao login -method=oidc -path=netkingdom role=warden-sign`, role path
`auth/netkingdom/role/warden-sign`, bound to `groups=["net-kingdom-admins"]`
and attaching only policy `warden-sign`. Replied to ops-warden in State Hub
message `0bce1e08-58c2-4db4-b06c-f86cf8142273`; no token value, role_id,
secret_id, or token accessor was included.
Define and execute the handoff: mint a fresh `secret_id`, deliver it (with the
`role_id`) to the operator out-of-band; warden does `approle login` to obtain a
`VAULT_TOKEN`. Post the non-secret pointers on the ops-warden thread (policy name,
AppRole name, mount `ssh`, addr `https://bao.coulomb.social`, token TTL, status).
Acceptance:
- Pointers are posted to State Hub; no token value or `secret_id` appears there or
in Git/logs.
- The operator can run, on CoulombCore:
`FLEX_AUTH_EXTERNAL=1 SMOKE_VAULT=1 VAULT_TOKEN=<scoped> ~/ops-warden/scripts/policy_gate_production_smoke.sh`.
## T05 - Confirm the joint smoke and signal ops-warden
```task
id: SECRETS-WP-0004-T05
status: wait
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "aa0f281e-976d-4fcd-b8a3-78582117f86f"
```
2026-06-29: Offline tests pass (`59 passed, 2 skipped`) and route/dry-run CLI
checks produce non-secret pointers. Joint production smoke and ops-warden signal
remain waiting on live OpenBao apply, handoff, and operator-run smoke evidence.
Confirm the unblock end to end, then reply to ops-warden (msg 077ac90d) with the
pointers and runbook alignment. The reply is the explicit "we will signal
ops-warden when done" step.
Acceptance:
- Allow path resolves to `backend: vault` + a `policy_decision_id`; deny path
(ttl 999) is rejected by flex-auth before OpenBao.
- ops-warden is replied to on State Hub with the non-secret pointers.
- A revocation/rotation task exists for the minted credential.
## Exit Criteria
- A narrow `warden-sign` policy + AppRole exist on production OpenBao, minted and
custodied by secrets-engine, granting only `ssh/sign/<allowlisted-role>` update.
- The operator can obtain a scoped `VAULT_TOKEN` non-interactively without `bao`.
- FLEX-WP-0007 T4 joint smoke is unblocked (or blocked only on an explicit
external condition).
- ops-warden has the non-secret pointers; no secret value crossed State Hub.
- The bootstrap token and the minted credential have revocation tasks.