Complete Phase I foundations (SOUL-WP-0002)
Integrate research/foundations notes 001–005 into Terminology, Claims, bibliography, concept notes, thought experiments, and open questions. Write phase-i-foundations-synthesis.md, finish SOUL-WP-0002, and mark SOUL-WP-0003 ready for interaction research.
This commit is contained in:
parent
28cf824d31
commit
3fbcca209d
20 changed files with 3724 additions and 367 deletions
|
|
@ -1,33 +1,64 @@
|
|||
# Being
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** provisional
|
||||
**See also:** `Terminology.md`, RQ1, H1–H2, H7
|
||||
**Status:** revised (Phase I, 2026-08-12)
|
||||
**See also:** `Terminology.md`, RQ1, H1–H2, H7, RN-001–003
|
||||
|
||||
## Working definition
|
||||
## Working definition (v0.2)
|
||||
|
||||
A **Being** is a sufficiently coherent and persistent informational system that:
|
||||
> An **autonomous informational individual** exhibiting sufficiently coherent
|
||||
> dimensions of **personhood** to become an **addressable** entity that is
|
||||
> **recognized** by other Beings as a persistent counterpart.
|
||||
|
||||
1. maintains a distinguishable boundary between itself and its environment,
|
||||
2. can be instantiated as an identifiable and addressable entity,
|
||||
3. exhibits meaningful continuity across time,
|
||||
4. constructs models that support adaptive interaction,
|
||||
5. and is recognized by other beings as a persistent counterpart with which
|
||||
relationships can be established.
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Being ≈ AutonomousIndividuality + Personhood + Addressability + Recognition
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Beinghood ≈ **internal closure + continuity + external recognition**
|
||||
Not arithmetic — four requirement *families*.
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes for research
|
||||
## Autonomous individuality profile (substrate)
|
||||
|
||||
From RN-002 (renamed in RN-003 so autonomy alone is not labeled “Being”):
|
||||
|
||||
| Code | Dimension |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| B1 | Individuability |
|
||||
| B2 | Temporal integrity |
|
||||
| B3 | Constitutive integration |
|
||||
| B4 | Self-maintenance participation |
|
||||
| B5 | Endogenous viability |
|
||||
| B6 | Adaptive regulation |
|
||||
| B7 | Interactional asymmetry |
|
||||
| B8 | Identity-preserving transformation |
|
||||
|
||||
Treat as a **profile**, not eight Boolean gates.
|
||||
|
||||
## Stack
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Informational process
|
||||
→ Individuated system
|
||||
→ Autonomous individual
|
||||
→ (+ personhood, addressability, recognition) → Being
|
||||
→ (+ reciprocal relations) → Social Being
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- Not restricted to biological organisms; not automatic for every computational process.
|
||||
- Prefer degree of systemic coherence and recognition over a pure binary.
|
||||
- Distinguish systemic existence from social recognition of existence.
|
||||
- Autonomy-only reading yields false positives (self-maintaining daemon, control plane).
|
||||
- Personhood-only reading yields false positives (stateless person-like chatbots as APE).
|
||||
- Distinguish systemic individuality from social recognition of existence.
|
||||
|
||||
## Crosswalk (to fill)
|
||||
## Crosswalk
|
||||
|
||||
| Adjacent term | Similarity | Difference |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| autopoietic system | | |
|
||||
| autonomous agent | | |
|
||||
| person | | |
|
||||
| individual | | |
|
||||
| operationally closed system | | |
|
||||
| autopoietic system | self-maintaining organization | biological autopoiesis not required; contested beyond life |
|
||||
| autonomous agent | multi-criteria agency | agent often functional; Being requires personhood layer |
|
||||
| person | personhood layer | personhood ≠ full Beinghood |
|
||||
| individual | individuability | may lack autonomy/personhood/recognition |
|
||||
| operationally closed system | closure | closure alone insufficient for “someone” |
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
|
||||
`research/foundations/001-*.md`, `002-*.md`, `003-beinghood-stress-test.md`
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,23 +1,27 @@
|
|||
# Body
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** provisional
|
||||
**Status:** retained (Phase I, 2026-08-12)
|
||||
**Working gloss:** Body = Action
|
||||
|
||||
## Working definition
|
||||
|
||||
The **Body** is the operational dimension of a Being: the means through which it
|
||||
perceives, operates, and affects its environment.
|
||||
The operational dimension of a Being: channels of perception and action.
|
||||
|
||||
For artificial beings this may include language interfaces, APIs, tools, sensors,
|
||||
databases, actuators, communication channels, avatars, compute, and permissions.
|
||||
For artificial beings: language interfaces, APIs, tools, sensors, databases,
|
||||
actuators, avatars, compute, permissions — possibly distributed and replaceable.
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes for research
|
||||
## Phase I notes
|
||||
|
||||
- Body is not identical with identity; components may be replaced.
|
||||
- Distributed and replaceable artificial bodies are expected.
|
||||
- Connect to embodiment literature without requiring biological embodiment.
|
||||
- Body ≠ identity; RN-005 Body replacement can preserve Being with continuity.
|
||||
- Multi-Body manifestation need not be a fork if constitutive integration holds.
|
||||
- Body is present-tense coupling; Soul carries diachronic relation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Open issues
|
||||
|
||||
- Minimal body for a Being?
|
||||
- Relation between Body and Actor.
|
||||
- Relation between Body and Actor (Actor is technical manifestation stack;
|
||||
Body is the functional action dimension — often overlapping in practice).
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
|
||||
RN-001 temporal triad; RN-005 Body/Actor replacement cases
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,25 +1,47 @@
|
|||
# Identity
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** under review
|
||||
**See also:** RQ5, H6, thought experiments TE-02–TE-05, TE-08
|
||||
**Status:** revised (Phase I, 2026-08-12)
|
||||
**See also:** RQ5, H6, TE-02–TE-05, TE-08, RN-004, RN-005
|
||||
|
||||
## Working definition
|
||||
## Disambiguation
|
||||
|
||||
**Identity** concerns what makes temporally separated manifestations instances of
|
||||
the **same Being**.
|
||||
| Question | Soul Frame term |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Same entity over time? | **Identity** (numerical / reidentification) |
|
||||
| What continues? | **Continuity** (may branch) |
|
||||
| Historical relatedness after branch? | **Lineage** |
|
||||
| What is it like? | **Characterization** (narrative/character) |
|
||||
|
||||
Working hypothesis: identity is **substrate-independent but continuity-dependent**.
|
||||
Replacing the technical Actor need not replace the Being if sufficient continuity
|
||||
is preserved.
|
||||
Identity ≠ Continuity ≠ Lineage ≠ Character.
|
||||
|
||||
## Continuity candidates
|
||||
## Core formulation
|
||||
|
||||
- informational continuity
|
||||
- psychological / memory continuity
|
||||
- narrative identity
|
||||
- relational continuity (recognition and relationships)
|
||||
- bodily / embodiment continuity (where applicable)
|
||||
> A Being continues not because its state remains the same, but because its
|
||||
> changes remain part of one appropriately connected history of self-individuation.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> When that history branches, identity becomes lineage.
|
||||
|
||||
## Hard cases
|
||||
## Continuity profile (constitutive dimensions)
|
||||
|
||||
Forks, merges, backups, multi-manifestation, amnesia, gradual component replacement.
|
||||
Causal, organizational, psychological, autobiographical/narrative, normative,
|
||||
relational.
|
||||
|
||||
**Anchors / evidence (not constitutive alone):** provenance, address, substrate.
|
||||
|
||||
## Topology labels
|
||||
|
||||
`CONTINUOUS | DEGRADED | UNCERTAIN | SUCCESSOR | FORKED | RECONSTRUCTED | USURPED | TERMINATED`
|
||||
|
||||
## Implications for artificial systems
|
||||
|
||||
- Actor/Body replacement can preserve identity (substrate independence + continuity dependence).
|
||||
- Sameness of data is not sameness of Being.
|
||||
- Forks require governance; perfect copy while original continues yields FORKED lineage.
|
||||
- Ghosts default to authorized succession/representation, not automatic numerical identity.
|
||||
- Explicit identity governance is required because state is inspectable, copyable, editable.
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
|
||||
`research/foundations/004-identity-and-continuity.md`
|
||||
`research/foundations/ResearchNote005-IdentityContinuityStressTest.md`
|
||||
Locke; Parfit; Olson SEP; process identity literature
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,25 +1,39 @@
|
|||
# Mind
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** provisional
|
||||
**Working gloss:** Mind = Model (adaptive control through models)
|
||||
**Status:** retained / refined (Phase I, 2026-08-12)
|
||||
**Working gloss:** Mind = Model (adaptive control through models)
|
||||
**See also:** H3, H4, RQ3, RN-001, RN-006
|
||||
|
||||
## Working definition
|
||||
|
||||
The **Mind** is the adaptive control and model-building dimension of a Being.
|
||||
The adaptive modeling and regulatory dimension of a Being: how it constructs and
|
||||
revises models of itself, others, environment, and relationships, and uses them
|
||||
to guide action.
|
||||
|
||||
It constructs actionable representations of self, environment, other beings,
|
||||
relationships, intentions, possible futures, and consequences of action.
|
||||
> **Mind = Model**
|
||||
|
||||
Models change through interaction. **Co-adaptive model building** is mutual,
|
||||
recursive modeling among interacting beings.
|
||||
## Precedents
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes for research
|
||||
| Tradition | Contribution |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Ashby cybernetics | regulation, variety |
|
||||
| Conant & Ashby 1970 | good regulator requires a model |
|
||||
| Extended / distributed cognition | Mind not confined to a single substrate |
|
||||
| Social cognition (RN-006) | self/other/relation models co-adapt through interaction |
|
||||
|
||||
- Prefer model-based control over intelligence or consciousness alone as the
|
||||
primary foundation for Mind in Soul Frame.
|
||||
- Connect to cybernetics, predictive processing, active inference, theory of mind.
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- Prefer model-based control over intelligence or consciousness as foundation.
|
||||
- “Model” should not be restricted to explicit propositional representation only
|
||||
(enactive critiques remain open — OQ-055).
|
||||
- Co-adaptive model building is joint evolution through interaction, not model exchange.
|
||||
|
||||
## Open issues
|
||||
|
||||
- Definition of "model" precise enough for crosswalk.
|
||||
- Embodied vs purely informational modeling.
|
||||
- Minimal model apparatus for a Mind
|
||||
- Recursive depth for social personhood
|
||||
- Collective / distributed Mind boundaries (TE-05)
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
|
||||
`research/foundations/001-*.md`, `Research Note 006 — Social Mind and Co-Adaptive Model Building.md`
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,21 +1,33 @@
|
|||
# Recognition
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** provisional
|
||||
**See also:** H7, RQ6, TE-09
|
||||
**Status:** revised (Phase I, 2026-08-12)
|
||||
**See also:** H7, RQ6, TE-09, RN-001 Findings 8–10
|
||||
|
||||
## Working definition
|
||||
## Three senses
|
||||
|
||||
**Recognition** is the treatment of a system by other beings as a distinguishable,
|
||||
addressable, continuous counterpart with which models and relationships can be
|
||||
maintained.
|
||||
| Sense | Meaning |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Epistemic | Detect/classify an entity |
|
||||
| Intentional | Treat as agent with goals/beliefs (cf. intentional stance) |
|
||||
| Social / normative | Treat as counterpart in relationships, obligations, reputation |
|
||||
|
||||
Working social principle:
|
||||
## Role in Beinghood
|
||||
|
||||
Recognition is **constitutive of social Beinghood**, not of bare autonomous
|
||||
individuality. Beinghood v0.2 includes recognition among requirement families
|
||||
for the intended “someone” category — TE-09 still pressures that packaging.
|
||||
|
||||
## Working social principle
|
||||
|
||||
> A system becomes socially relevant as a Being when other beings can distinguish
|
||||
> it, address it, expect continuity from it, maintain models of it, and enter
|
||||
> persistent relationships with it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes for research
|
||||
## Related
|
||||
|
||||
- Distinguish systemic existence from social recognition of existence.
|
||||
- Connect to recognition theory, symbolic interactionism, intersubjectivity.
|
||||
- **Addressability** — ability to target the entity specifically
|
||||
- **Social Being** — embedded in reciprocal models and relations
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
|
||||
RN-001 §9–10; Mead 1934; Phase II sociology pass pending
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,28 +1,49 @@
|
|||
# Soul
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** provisional / under review
|
||||
**Working gloss:** Soul = Relation
|
||||
**Status:** revised (Phase I, 2026-08-12)
|
||||
**Working gloss:** Soul = Relation
|
||||
**See also:** H5, RQ4, RN-001 Finding 14, RN-005 SF-C055
|
||||
|
||||
## Working definition
|
||||
## Working definition (revised)
|
||||
|
||||
The **Soul** is the evolving relational boundary through which a Being develops
|
||||
identity, relationships, history, commitments, provenance, reputation, and
|
||||
persistent influence in its environment.
|
||||
> The **relation-bearing dimension** through which interactions become persistent
|
||||
> relationships, commitments, provenance, history, reputation, and consequences
|
||||
> connecting a Being to other systems across time.
|
||||
|
||||
It is not identical with the environment; it is the coupling boundary and the
|
||||
persistent consequences of interactions across that boundary.
|
||||
In Soul Frame: **Soul = Relation**.
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes for research
|
||||
## What Soul is not
|
||||
|
||||
- Informational, not metaphysical, reading of persistence/"eternity".
|
||||
- A Being may cease operating while influence continues (legacy).
|
||||
- High terminology collision risk; retention requires explanatory payoff.
|
||||
| Not Soul | Belongs to |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| System/environment boundary | **Being** |
|
||||
| Operational channels | **Body** |
|
||||
| Adaptive interpretation | **Mind** |
|
||||
|
||||
## Structural ambiguity to resolve
|
||||
Initial definition overloaded Soul with boundary + relations + legacy. Phase I
|
||||
strips boundary out.
|
||||
|
||||
Does Soul name:
|
||||
## Temporal role
|
||||
|
||||
1. the boundary itself,
|
||||
2. the relational structures crossing the boundary,
|
||||
3. the accumulated consequences of those interactions,
|
||||
4. or a carefully defined combination?
|
||||
- **Body** — present operational coupling
|
||||
- **Mind** — interpretation and control of possible states
|
||||
- **Soul** — diachronic relational continuity and propagated effects
|
||||
|
||||
Soul continuity can **cross Being-identity discontinuities** (legacy, models in
|
||||
others, works, Ghosts).
|
||||
|
||||
## Collision analysis
|
||||
|
||||
High risk with religious/metaphysical “soul”. Retention depends on explanatory
|
||||
payoff of the relational reading. Rename remains open (RQ4).
|
||||
|
||||
## Open issues
|
||||
|
||||
1. Relations vs accumulated consequences vs both (packaging)
|
||||
2. Rename candidates if collision cost exceeds value
|
||||
3. How Soul relates to lineage after forks
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
|
||||
`research/foundations/001-closure-model-relation-recognition.md` §14–16
|
||||
`research/foundations/ResearchNote005-IdentityContinuityStressTest.md` SF-C055
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue